Sugar Tech

, 6:297 | Cite as

Evaluation of sugarcane varieties for maturity earliness and selection for efficient sugar accumulation

Sugarcane Agriculture

Abstract

Aiming at producing adequate sugar yield, the initial selection from 26 varieties of sugarcane (Saccharum hybrids) was made over 14 months of growth on the bases of interrelated juice and sugar parameters including earliness age, high Pol % cane, purity and CCS. Selection standards of 15 Pol % cane, 85 % purity and 14.2 % CCS at maturity allowed the selection of 12 superior varieties including Q77N1232, Q136, Q127, BT65152, Cassius, Cadmus; PS57, PS58, Co6519, C06806, Co997 and Ragnar. Their maturity profiles showed that juice and cane parameters are significantly correlated. The first three varieties, Co 6806, Cadmus and Co 997, matured at <11 months (early maturing), and the remaining nine varieties; PS58, Co6519, BT65152, Q77N1232, Q136, Ragnar, Cassius, Q127 and PS57, matured at ≥11- 12 months (medium maturing). The 12 selected varieties were subjected to further selection based on a selection standard of 17.5 TSH, resulting in selecting eight top-most varieties; Q77N1232, Q127, BT65152, Cassius, Cadmus, Co6519, Co997 and Ragnar. Furthermore, selection based on moderate fibre content set at 14 ≥ fibre % cane allowed for the selection of four best varieties, (Q127, Cadmus, Co6519 and Ragnar). Ragnar, as an ideal variety with high sugar yield, tolerant to drought with medium maturity age and long production period, was taken as a standard, against which the other three varieties possessed higher values of juice parameters, with L14 the highest of all. However, L 14 was sensitive to drought, while the other two varieties were moderate. The superiority of L 14 is hindered by its sensitivity to drought. The overlapping of maturity age and prolonged production periods would prolong the harvesting season and make the cropping season more efficient, as it allows for early harvest, maintaining varietal diversification and sustainable production. The results provide significant information for the possible extension of sugarcane commercial cultivation in Papua New Guinea.

Keywords

Earliness maturity Saccharum spp. sugarcane 

References

  1. Acland, J.D. (1973). East African crops. An introduction to the production of field and plantation crops in Kenya, Tanzania and Uganda. Published by arrangement with theFAO of the United Nations by Longman Group Ltd., Singapore, 192–201.Google Scholar
  2. Barnes, A.C. (1974). The sugarcane.Leonar’d Hill, London, p. 20–29.Google Scholar
  3. Blackburn, F.H.B. (1984). Sugarcane.Longman Inc. New York, p. 30–42.Google Scholar
  4. Bureau of Sugar Experiment Station (BSES) (1991). The standard laboratory manual for Australian sugar mills,Analytical Methods and Tables, Vol. 2, Brisbane, Australia.Google Scholar
  5. Calderon, H., Besosa, R., Amaya, A., Luna, C.A., Moreno, C.A. and Cassalett, C. (1996). Evaluation of sugarcane varieties suitable for early harvesting under tropical conditions.Proc. 1SSCT. XXII: 293–297.Google Scholar
  6. Chen, J.W. and Chang, Y.S. (1996). ROC-18 a heavy tonnage and early maturing variety. Taiwan Sugar, August, 18-20.Google Scholar
  7. Clements, F.H. (1980). Sugarcane crop logging and crop control, principles and practices.The University Press of Hawaii, Honolulu, USA, 360–395.Google Scholar
  8. Cox, M.C., Hogarth, D.M. and Mullius, R.T. (1990). Clonal evaluation of early sugar content. InProc. of Austr. Soc. Sug. Cane Technol.,12: 90–98.Google Scholar
  9. Cuenya, M.I. and Mariotti, J.A. (1986). Selection of sugarcane for quality components and ripening ability.Proc. ISSCT,XIX: 429–439.Google Scholar
  10. Cuenya, M.I. and Mariotti, J.A. (1996). Breeding sugarcane for early high sugar content in subtropical climates.Proc. ISSCT,XXII: 316–320.Google Scholar
  11. Das, P.K., Nayak, N. and Mahapatra, S.S. (1997). Performance of early maturing sugarcane genotypes in the coastal plainsoi Orissa. Sugarcane and Its Problems.Indian Sugar,XLVI: 111–113.Google Scholar
  12. Domaingue, R., Ramdoyal, K., Mamet, L.D., Bissessur, D. and Rivet, L. (1998). Breeding and selection programme at the Mauritius Sugar Industry Research Institute, MSIRI. Country Presentations.4th ISSCT Breeding and Germplasm Workshop, 18–22 May, Mauritius.Google Scholar
  13. Doorenbos, J. and Kassam, A.H. (1986). Yield response to water.FAO, Irrigation and drainage paper 33. Sugarcane, 145–149.Google Scholar
  14. Egan, B.T. (1986). New disease problem appear in Papua New Guinea.Bureau of Sugarcane Experimental Station (BSES). Bulletin16: 8–10.Google Scholar
  15. Fernandes, A.C. and Benda, G.T.A. (1985). Distribution pattern of Brix and fibre in the primary stalk of sugarcane.Sugar Cane,5: 8–13.Google Scholar
  16. Gonzales, A.R. and Galvez, R.G. (1998). Early maturing varieties of high sugar content.Sugar Cane Abstracts, Cane breeding and varieties,5: 23.Google Scholar
  17. Hebert, L.P. (1972). Effect of maturity on milling quality of five sugarcane varieties.Proc. ISSCT,XIV: 132–136.Google Scholar
  18. Hunsigi, G. (1993). Production of sugarcane, Theory and Practice.Springer-Verlag, New York, 19–23.Google Scholar
  19. Indriani, Y.H. and Sumiarsih, E. (1995). Pembudidayaan tebu di lahan sawah dan tegalan.Penebar Swadaya, Jakarta, Indonesia, 18–39.Google Scholar
  20. Julien, R. (1972). An evaluation of methods used for maturity testing.Proc. ISSCT,XIV: 991–999.Google Scholar
  21. King, N.J., Mungomery, R.W. and Hughes, CG. (1965). Manual of cane growing.Augus & Robertson Ltd. Melbourne, 164–175.Google Scholar
  22. Legendre, B.L. and Benda, G.T.A. (1984). Single plant for testing a chemical ripener in sugarcane.Sugar Cane,3: 7–9.Google Scholar
  23. Lingle, S.E. and Irvine, J.E. (1994). Sucrose synthase and natural ripening in sugarcane.Crop Sci.,34: 1279–1283.Google Scholar
  24. Lonsdale, J.E. and Gosnell, J.M. (1974). Monitoring maturity of sugarcane during drying-off.Proc. ISSCT, 713–724.Google Scholar
  25. Mamet, L.D., Julien, M.H.R. and Galwey, N.W. (1996). Earliness of ripening is sugarcane(Saccharum spp.) in Mauritius: variation and inheritance studies.Sugar Cane. 4: 311.Google Scholar
  26. Maretzki, A. and dela-Cruz, A. (1979). Model ripening with glyphosate in young sugarcane plants.Proc. Hawaii Sugar Tech. 38: 79–82.Google Scholar
  27. Martin, F.A., Steib, R.J. and Pill, G.M. (1980). Ripener efficiency as affected by Ratoon Stunt disease.Proc. ISSCT,XVII: 614–617.Google Scholar
  28. Miller, J.D. (1985). Variation in tissue culture subclones of sugarcane.Sugar Cane,1: 11–16.Google Scholar
  29. Muchow, R.C., Robertson, M.J. and Ubod, A.W. (1996). Growth of sugarcane under high input conditions in tropical Australia. II. Sucrose accumulation and commercial yield.Field Crops Research,48: 27–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Nagarajan, R. and Somarajan, K.G. (1988). Evaluation ofSaccharum officinarum for yield and quality attributes.Sugar Cane, Autumn, Supplement 6–8.Google Scholar
  31. Nasir Ahmed, S., Gauthaman, K.G., Chinnasamy, K., Jagannathan, R. and Parameswaran, P. (1995). Yield and quality performance of early maturing sugarcane varieties.Indian Sugar XLV,6: 365–366.Google Scholar
  32. Singh, P.R. and Gupta, M.R. (1999). Sugarcane management strategy for early maturing varieties for higher productivity in U.P. Sugarcane & It’s Problems.Indian Sugar, March, 983–989.Google Scholar
  33. Singh, S. and Reddy, M.S. (1980). Growth, yields and juice quality performance of sugarcane varieties under different soil moisture regimes in relation to drought resistance.Proc. ISSCT,XVII: 541–555.Google Scholar
  34. Singh, R.K. and Singh, G.P. (1998). Effect of sampling time on efficacy of selection for quality traits in sugarcane.Sugar Cane,3: 13–17.Google Scholar
  35. Soopramanien, G.C., Teeluck, M. and Mestry, J. (1990). Ripener effect on cane growth, sucrose content and regrowth.Sugar Cane, Spring Supplement, 1–4.Google Scholar
  36. Steel, R.G.D. and Torrie, J.H. (1980). Priciples and procedures of statistics a biometrical approach. McGraw-Hill, New York, 239–284.Google Scholar
  37. Sunil, H.K. and Lawrence, M.J. (1996). Quantitative genetics of sugarcane: A large-scale evaluation ofSaccharum germplasm.Sugarcane,6: 3–10.Google Scholar
  38. Tai, B.Y.P., Powell, G., Perdomo, R. and Eiland, B.R. (1996). Changes in sucrose and fibre content during sugarcane maturation.Sugar Cane,6: 19–23.Google Scholar
  39. Wagih, M.E. (2003). A novel method for screening sugarcane genotypes for maturity earliness through monitoring chloroplast development and starch accumulation.Sugar Tech,5(4): 249–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Wagih, M.E., Kaiulo, J.V., Ala, A. and Musa, Y. (2000). Screening sugarcane varieties for drought tolerance.Science in New Guinea,26 (1, 2, 3): 38–45.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Society for Sugar Research & Promotion 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Biotechnology CentreUniversity of TechnologyLae, Papua NiuginiNorth Australia
  2. 2.Hasanuddin UniversityMakassarIndonesia

Personalised recommendations