Journal of Computing in Higher Education

, Volume 13, Issue 2, pp 4–24 | Cite as

A community of practice: Web portals and faculty development

Article

Abstract

ACCOMPLISHING CHANGE IN EDUCATION must start where learning begins: with the classroom teacher. The recent “Report to the Nation from The National Commission on Mathematics and Science Teaching in the 21st Century” was unequivocal in its message (Before It’s Too Late, September 2000). The way to improve learning in science, mathematics, and technology is to improve teaching. And better teaching can be achieved through better preparation, professional development, and working conditions for our nation’s teachers. Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology (with support from the Lilly Endowment) is constructing a Web portal dedicated to improving middle school science, mathematics, and technology (SMT) instruction. Essentially, this gateway emulates emerging corporate practices of knowledge management and process reinvention through information technology (IT). We expand the notion of “professional development” to include not only training in computer competency (explicit knowledge) but also mentoring in the higher-order understanding (tacit knowledge) necessary for meaningful integration of instructional technologies into the classroom. Our portal creates a “community of practice” for middle school teachers across Indiana to share experiences and to harvest the remarkable opportunities for improved SMT learning through Web-delivered simulations, visualization, modeling, access to live data, and to enable new collaborations, interactive learning, and alternative pedagogical approaches. Rose-Hulman faculty and digital media specialists serve as partners by providing ongoing advice, hosting special Web-conferences, and helping to author classroom modules.

Keywords

portals professional development organizational change educational partnerships instructional technology 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Before it’s too late (2000). A report to the Nation from The National Commission on Mathematics and Science Teaching for the 21st Century, John Glenn (Chairperson). [Online] Available: http://www.ed.gov/americacounts/glenn/toolateececsum.html#full.Google Scholar
  2. Bohnenkamp, J., & McMahon, J., (June 2001). CLICK: Community of learners, information, communication, and knowledge.Journal of Technological Horizons in Education. 28(11). 20–24.Google Scholar
  3. Carlson, P.A. (October 2001). A grassroots approach to educational partnerships.Journal of Technological Horizons in Education. 29(3), 83–87.Google Scholar
  4. Collins, H. (2001).Corporate portals: Revolutionizing information access to increase productivity. New York, NY: American Management Association.Google Scholar
  5. Colwell, R. (1999, February 24). Graduate science, math, engineering & technology students can become K-12 teaching fellows.Science Daily. [Online] Available: http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/1999/02/990224073354.htm.Google Scholar
  6. Davenport, T.H. (1993).Process innovation: Reengineering work through information technology. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
  7. Davydov, M.M. (2001).Corporate portals and e-business integration. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Publishers.Google Scholar
  8. Eisler, D.L. (2001). Campus portals: Supportive mechanisms for university communication, collaboration, and organizational change.Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 13(1), 3–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hammer, M. (1996).Beyond reengineering: How the process-centered organization is changing our work and our lives. New York, NY: Harper.Google Scholar
  10. Kidwell, J., Vander Linde, K., & Johnson, S. (2000). Applying corporate knowledge management practices in higher education,Educause Quarterly, 4. [Online] Available: http://www.educasue.edu/ir/library/pdf/EQM0044.pdf.Google Scholar
  11. McCartney, G. (n.d.).Portal technology: Into the looking glass. [Online] Available: http://www.convergemag.com/SpecialPubs/Portal/portal.shtm.Google Scholar
  12. National Assessment of Educational Progress. (2000).The Nation’s Report Card. [Online] Available: http://nces.ed.gov/nationsreportcard/mathematics and http://nces.ed.gov/nationsreportcard/science.Google Scholar
  13. National Research Council (1996).National science educations Standards. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  14. Reber, A. (1995).Implicit learning and tacit knowledge: An essay on the cognitive unconscious. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Ryle, G. (1984).The concept of mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  16. Senge, P. (1990).The fifth discipline: The art and practice of the learning organization. New York, NY: Doubleday.Google Scholar
  17. Third international mathematics and science study-repeat (TIMSS-R) (1999). [Online] Available: http://timssGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Humanities and Social SciencesRose-Human Institute of TechnologyTerre Haute

Personalised recommendations