Journal of Computing in Higher Education

, Volume 15, Issue 1, pp 128–142 | Cite as

Course management systems and online teaching

Abstract

TEACHING AN EFFECTIVE ONLINE COURSE is a challenging experience. Although the content may be similar to that provided in a “traditional” course, the delivery, communication aspects, and management of an online course are quite different. In the past few years, course management systems have been developed that provide valuable tools for teaching and managing an online course.

This article presents an overview of the features of course management systems as they pertain to teaching online courses. Specifically, it identifies tools and techniques related to the effective use of management features, assessment options, instructional activities, and communication in online courses.

Keywords

online learning course management distance learning e-learning 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aluise, F. (2001). Kaleidoscope of designing, administering and teaching distance education. In J. Price, D. Willis, N. Davis, & J. Willis (Eds.), Proceedings of SITE 2001 (p. 113). Charlottesville, VA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education.Google Scholar
  2. Arnone, M., & Galbraith, K. (2002, July 12). Course-management outfits still seek elusive profits. The Chronicle of Higher Education, 48 (44), p. A33.Google Scholar
  3. Balsera, A.F. (2001). The road ahead: The evolution of online learning. In J. Price, D. Willis, N. Davis, & J. Willis (Eds.), Proceedings of SITE 2001 (pp. 11–16). Charlottesville, VA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education.Google Scholar
  4. Blackboard Building Blocks. (2003). Blackboard, Inc. [Online]. Available: http://products.blackboard.com/cp/release6/BuildingBlocks.pdf [2003, February 17].Google Scholar
  5. Campus Computing Project. (2001, October). The 2001 National Survey of Information Technology in US Higher Education: eCommerce comes slowly to the campus. Encino, CA. [Online]. Available: http://www.campuscomputing.net/pdf/2001-CCP.pdf [2002, December 8].Google Scholar
  6. Carmean, C., & Haefner, J. (2002). Mind over matter: Transforming course management systems into effective learning environments. Educause Review, 37(6), 26–34. [Online]. Available: http://www.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/erm0261.pdf [2003, February 17].Google Scholar
  7. Collura, M. (2003, February). Not just another pretty course web site. Syllabus. [Online]. Available: http://www.syllabus.com/article.asp?id=7254 [2003, February 15].Google Scholar
  8. Curtis, D.D., & Lawson, M.J. (2001, May). Exploring collaborative online learning. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks. 5(1). [Online]. Available: http://www.aln.org/publications/jaln/v5nl/v5nl_curtis.asp [2003, February 16].Google Scholar
  9. eLearning Group. (2002). Results of the WebCT Student Survey — 2002. Georgia State University. [Online]. Available: http://www.gsu.edu/~wwwets/support/webct2002stdt_survey.html [2002, December 8].Google Scholar
  10. Firdyiwek, Y. (1999, January-February). Web-based courseware tools: Where is the pedagogy? Educational Technology, 39(1), 29–34.Google Scholar
  11. Foreman, J., & Widmayer, S. (2000, Fall). How on-line course management systems affect the course. Journal of Interactive Instructional Development, 13(2), 16–19.Google Scholar
  12. Herrmann, N, & Popyack, J. L. (2003, January). Electronic grading: When the tablet is mightier than the pen. Syllabus. [Online]. Available: http://www.syllabus.com/article.asp?id=7094 [2003, February 16].Google Scholar
  13. Hartley, K., Gibney, T., Heflich, D., & Strudler, N. (2001). Developing standards of quality for online courses. In J. Price, D. Willis, N. Davis, & J. Willis (Eds.), Proceedings of SITE 2001 (pp. 195–196). Charlottesville, VA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education.Google Scholar
  14. Johnstone, S.M. (2003, January). Some light on the higher ed horizon. Syllabus. [Online]. Available: http://www.syllabus.com/article.asp?id=7097 [2003, February 15, 2003].Google Scholar
  15. Jonassen, D.H. (2000). Computers as mindtools for schools: Engaging critical thinking. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill.Google Scholar
  16. Kieran-Greenbush, S. (2001). Teaching web-based distance education courses. In J. Price, D. Willis, N. Davis, & J. Willis (Eds.), Proceedings of SITE 2001 (pp. 118–120). Charlottesville, VA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education.Google Scholar
  17. Lewis, L., Snow, K., Farris, E., & Levin, D. (1999). Distance Education at Postsecondary Education Institutions: 1997–98 (NCES 2000-013). U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  18. Long, P.D. (2003, January). Learning management systems: Seeking paradigms for collaboration. Syllabus. [Online]. Available: http://www.syllabus.com/article.asp?id=7096 [2003, February 15, 2003].Google Scholar
  19. McCollum, K. (1997, October 31). A new industry sprouts up to help professors put courses on line. The Chronicle of Higher Education. p. A33.Google Scholar
  20. Merideth, E.M., & Steinbronn, P.E. (2001). One size does not fit all: Designing distance education support. In J. Price, D. Willis, N. Davis, & J. Willis (Eds.), Proceedings of SITE 2001 (pp. 145–150). Charlottesville, VA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education.Google Scholar
  21. National Education Association. (2000, June). A survey of traditional and distance learning higher education members. Washington, DC: National Education Association.Google Scholar
  22. National Postsecondary Student Aid Survey (1999–2000). Washington DC: U.S. Department of Education. [Online]. Available: http://nces.ed.gov/surveys/npsas/ [2002, December 8].Google Scholar
  23. Open Knowledge Initiative. (2002). What is the Open Knowledge Initiative? Massachusetts Institute of Technology. [Online]. Available: http://web.mit.edu/oki/proj/edu2002/OKI_white_paper/pdf [2002, December 8].Google Scholar
  24. Powers, R. (2003). Meeting the challenges of becoming an online course developer. University of Maryland: Resources for Learning. [Online.] Available: http://www.umuc.edu/facdev/resources/challenges.html [2003, February 16].Google Scholar
  25. Sikora, A.C., & Carroll, C.D. (2002, November). A profile of participation in distance education 1999–2000. National Center for Educational Statistics 2001-154. Washington DC: U. S. Department of Education. [Online]. Available: http://nces.ed.gov/pubs2003/2003154.pdf. [2002, December 8]Google Scholar
  26. Testing, assessment, and survey applications for the e-Learning Market. (2003). Respondus, Inc. [Online]. Available: http://www.respondus.com [2003, February 16].Google Scholar
  27. Young, J.R. (2002, April 19). Pricing shifts by Blackboard and WebCT cost some colleges much more. The Chronicle of Higher Education, 48 (32), p. A35.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Florida Center for Instructional TechnologyUniversity of South FloridaTampa

Personalised recommendations