Journal of Computing in Higher Education

, Volume 15, Issue 1, pp 46–64 | Cite as

The laptop and the lecture: The effects of multitasking in learning environments

Article

Abstract

THE EFFECTS OF MULTITASKING IN THE CLASSROOM were investigated in students in an upper level Communications course. Two groups of students heard the same exact lecture and tested immediately following the lecture. One group of students was allowed to use their laptops to engage in browsing, search, and/or social computing behaviors during the lecture. Students in the second condition were asked to keep their laptops closed for the duration of the lecture. Students in the open laptop condition suffered decrements on traditional measures of memory for lecture content. A second experiment replicated the results of the first. Data were further analyzed by “browsing style.” Results are discussed from Lang’s Limited Process Capacity model in an attempt to better understand the mechanisms involved in the decrement.

Keywords

multitasking divided attention technology education limited capacity model 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Baddeley, A.D., Lewis, V., Eldridge, M., & Thomson, N. (1984). Attention and retrieval from long-term memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 13, 518–540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Broadbent, D. (1958).Perception and Communication. Oxford: Pergamon.Google Scholar
  3. Broadbent, D. (1971).Decision and Stress. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  4. Craik, F.I.M., & Lockhart, R.S. (1972). Levels of Processing: A framework for memory research.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 11, 671–684.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Fisch, S.M. (2000). A capacity model of children’s comprehension of educational content on television.Media Psychology, 2, 63–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Grace-Martin, M, & Gay, G. (2001). Web browsing, mobile computing and academic performance. Special Issue on Curriculum, Instruction, Learning and the Internet.IEEE and International Forum of Educational Technology & Society.Google Scholar
  7. James, W. (1890).The Principles of Psychology, Vol. 1. New York: Henry Hold & Co.Google Scholar
  8. Johnson, W.A., Greenberg, S.N., Fisher, R.P., & Martin, D.W. (1970).Journal of Experimental Psychology, 83 (1), 164–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Lang, A. (2001). The limited capacity model of mediated message processing.Journal of Communication, 46–70.Google Scholar
  10. Lee, J., Stefanone, M., & Gay, G. (2002)Web browsing and mobile computing: Examining characteristics of web browsing patterns. Paper to be presented at ICA, Communication and Technology Division.Google Scholar
  11. Mandler, G. (1967). Organization and memory. In K.W. Spence & J.T. Spence (Eds.),The Psychology of Learning and Motivation, Vol. 1. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  12. Naveh-Benjamen, M., Craik, F.I.M., Perretta, J.G., & Tonev, S.T. (2000). The effects of divided attention on encoding and retrieval processes: The resiliency of retrieval processes.The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 53A (3), 609–625.Google Scholar
  13. Postman, L. (1964). Sort-term memory and incidental learning. In A.W. Melton (Ed.),Categories of Human Learning. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  14. Soloway, E., Guzdial, M., & Hay, K. (1994, April). Learner-Centered design: The next challenge for HCI.ACM Interactions.Google Scholar
  15. Soloway, E., Krajcik, J.S., Blumenfeld, P., & Marx, R.W. (1996). Technological support for teachers transitioning to project-based science practices. In T. Koschmann (Ed.),CSCL: Theory and Practice For an Emerging Paradigm. New Jersey: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  16. Spelke, E., Hirst, W., & Neisser, U. (1976). Skills of divided attention.Cognition, 4, 215–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Tresselt, M.E., & Mayzner, M.S. (1960). Incidental learning: A function of associative strength and distance between S-R pairs.Journal of Psychology, (53), 155–160.Google Scholar
  18. Tulving, E., & Thompson, D.M. (1973). Encoding specificity and retrieval processes in episodic memory.Psychological Review, 50, 352–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Woodworth, R.S. (1921).Psychology: A Study of Mental Life. New York: Henry Holt & Co.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Human Computer Interaction LaboratoryCornell UniversityUSA

Personalised recommendations