Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology

, Volume 20, Issue 1, pp 621–633

Computer simulation of the dartmouth process for separation of dilute Ethanol/Water mixtures

  • José L. Torres
  • Hans E. Grethlein
  • Lee R. Lynd
Session 3 Bioengineering research

Abstract

High energy costs are associated with the recovery of ethanol from fermentation broths. This paper discusses a computer simulation of the Dartmouth Process, which aims to reduce these costs by the use of IHOSR distillation, extensive heat integration, and extractive distillation using a salt.

To resolve the uncertainty in modeling alcohol-water-salt vapor-liquid equilibrium, a new and more accurate activity coefficient model was used. An Aspen™ model was used to generate capital and energy costs for a range of ethanol concentrations in the feed. Simulation results show that the Dartmouth Process offers substantial economic advantages over benzene azeotropic distillation, particularly at low feed concentrations.

Index Entries

Ethanol separation activity coefficients computer simulation 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Abrams, D. S. and Prausnitz, J. M. (1975),AIChE J. 21(1), 116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Aspen Technology, Inc., 251 Vassar Street, Cambridge, MA 02139.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Chem Systems, Inc. (1984), “Economic Feasibility Study of an Enzymatic Hydrolysis Based Ethanol Plant with Prehydrolysis Pretreatment,” SERI Subcontract No. XX-3-03097-2, New York.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cook, R. and Furter, W. F. (1968),Can. J. Chem. Eng. 46, 119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Katzen, R. and Associates (1978), US Dept. of Commerce, HCP/J6639-01.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lynd, L. R. (1988),Advances in Biochemical Engineering/Biotechnology, Fiechter, A., ed., Springer/Verlag.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lynd, L. R. and Grethlein, H. E. (1984),Chem. Eng. Prog. Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lynd, L. R. and Grethlein, H. E. (1986),AIChE J. 32(8).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Schmitt, D. (1979),Dr. Ing. thesis, University of Karlsruhe, West Germany.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Schmitt, D. and Vogelpohl, A. (1983),Sep. Sci. Technol. 18(6), 547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Torres, J. L. (1988),D. Eng. thesis, Thayer School of Engineering, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Torres, J. L., Lynd, L. R., and Grethlein, H. E.AIChE J., submitted.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Venkatasubramanian, K. and Keim, C. (1985),Starch Conversion Technology, van Beynum, G. M. A. and Roels, J. A., eds., Dekker, NY.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Humana Press Inc. 1989

Authors and Affiliations

  • José L. Torres
    • 1
  • Hans E. Grethlein
    • 1
  • Lee R. Lynd
    • 1
  1. 1.Thayer School of EngineeringDartmouth CollegeHanover
  2. 2.Escuela de IngenieriaUniversidad de las AmericasPuebla
  3. 3.Michigan Biotechnology InstituteLansing

Personalised recommendations