Analysis of internal and external energy flows associated with projected process improvements in biomass ethanol production

  • Kevin Stone
  • Lee R. Lynd
Session 4 Process Economics and Commercialization

Abstract

Possible improvements in biomass ethanol production are decribed involving heat-pumped distillation, steam-cycle heat integration, elimination of seed fermenters, pretreatment heat integration, advanced pretreatment, thermophilic DMC, and incrased carbohydrate yield to 90% of theoretical. Although speculative, a futuristic process incorporating these improvements may be useful for anticipating some features of a technologically mature biomass ethanol process, as well as for comparing ethanol production to more technologically mature energy-conversion processes. Relative to the current state-of-the-art National Renewable Energy Laboratory process design, the futuristic process has 101% higher electricity revenue, 31% hgiher ethanol revenue, and 35–39% higher overall revenue depending on the assumed ethanol value. The overall first-law thermodynamic efficiency is 43% for the current NREL design and 59% for the futuristic process. A general consideration of the costs associated with the process improvements examined indicates that:
  1. 1.

    Elimination of seed reactors, advanced pretreatment, and thermophilic DMC all have large potential cost reductions independent of their benefits with respect to increased surplus electricity;

     
  2. 2.

    Steam cycle improvements and pretreatment heat integration are expected to have modest cost benefits that are dependent on increased electricity revenues; and

     
  3. 3.

    The relative cost of heat-pumped distillation depends on scale, capital recovery, and electricity value, but is generally similar to the already low cost of conventional distillation provided that the fermentation broth has a reasonably high ethanol concentration.

     

A comparison of utilizing biomass for ethanol-electricity coproduction and utilizing biomass for dedicated electricity production indicates that these two alternatives have approximately equal economic benefits. At the electricity yields associated with the futuristic process, every 1% displacement of US transportation demand is accompanied by a 0.29% displacement of electricity demand, underscoring the potential significance of electricity coproduced with ethanol in meeting energy needs.

Index Entries

Biomass ethanol electricity efficiency cogeneration 

References

  1. 1.
    Chem Systems. Technical and Economic Evaluation, Wood to Ethanol Process. Office of Energy Demand Policy, Department of Energy, Washington, in press.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Lynd, L. R., Cushman, J. H., Nols, R. J., and Wyman, C. E. (1991),Science 251, 1318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Lynd, L. R. and Grethlein, H. E. (1984),Chem. Eng. Prog. 81, 59.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Torres, H. L., Grethlein, H. E., and Lynd, L. R. (1989),Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 20/21, 621.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    South, C. R., Hogsett, D. A., and Lynd, L. R. Accepted byEnz. Microb. Technol. Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    South, C. R., Hogsett, D. A., and Lynd, L. R. (1993),Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 39/40, 587–600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ladisch, M. and Schwandt, R. (1992), Report of the starch conversion work grop, inProceedings, Technology for Expanding the Biofuels Industry, Biofuels Program, Department of Energy, Washington.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Heitz, M., Capek-Menard, E., Koeberle, P. G., Gagne, J., Chornet, E., Overend, R. P., Taylor, J. D., and Yu, E. (1991),Bioresource Technol. 35, 23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hogsett, D. A., Ahn, H.-J., Bernardez, T. D., South, C. R., and Lynd, L. R. (1992),Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 34/35, 527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lynd, L. R. (1989), Fiechter, A. ed., inAdv. Biochem. Eng./Biotechnol. 38 1.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Humana Press Inc. 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kevin Stone
    • 1
  • Lee R. Lynd
    • 2
  1. 1.General Electric CompanyIndustrial and Power SystemsSchenectady
  2. 2.Biotechnology and Biochemical Engineering Program, Thayer School of EngineeringDartmouth CollegeHanover

Personalised recommendations