Advertisement

Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology

, Volume 51, Issue 1, pp 413–422 | Cite as

Improvement of productivity in acetic acid fermentation withClostridium thermoaceticum

  • Minish M. Shah
  • Munir Cheryan
Session 3 Bioprocessing Research

Abstract

Production of acetic acid by a mutant strain ofClostridium thermoaceticum was compared in three types of membrane cell-recycle bioreactors. A modified fed-batch bioreactor (where the product is partially removed at the end of fermentation, but the cells are retained), and a two-stage CSTR (with product being removed continuously and the cells being recycled from the second to the first stage) resulted in better performance than a one-stage CSTR or batch fermenter. The difference in performance was greater at higher acetate concentration. With 45 g/L of glucose in the feed, productivity was 0.75–1.12 g/L·h and acetic acid concentrations were 34–38 g/L. This is more than double the batch system. The nutrient supply rate also appeared to have a strong influence on productivity of the microorganism.

Index Entries

clostridium thermoaceticum calcium magnesium acetate membrane bioreactor acetic acid fermentation 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Dunn, S. and Schenk, R. (1980),Alternative Highway Deicing Chemicals, Federal Highway Administration Report FHWA-RD-78-108, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Marynowski, C. W., Jones, J. L., Tuse, D., and Boughton, R. L. (1985),I & EC Prod. Res. & Dev. 24, 457–465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Busche, R. M. (1991)Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 28/29, 605–621.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Schwartz, R. D. and Keller, F. A. (1982)Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 43, 117–123.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Brumm, P. J. (1988)Biotechnol. Bioeng. 32, 444–450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Wang, D. I. C., Fleishchaker, R. J., and Wang, G. Y. (1978)AIChE Symp. Ser. No. 181, 74, 105–110.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Parekh, S. R. and Cheryan, M. (1990),Process Biochem. 25, 117–121.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ljungdahl, L. G., Carreira, L. H., Garrison, R. J., Rabek, N. E., Gunter, L. F., and Weigel, J. (1986),Final Report, FHWA/RD-86/117 Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Parekh, S. R. and Cheryan, M. (1990)Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 36, 384–387.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Parekh, S. R. and Cheryan, M. (1994)Biotechnol. Lett. 16, 139–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Wang, G. and Wang, D. I. C. (1983)Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 8, 491–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Reed, W. M. (1985), US Patent 4, 506, 012.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Parekh, S. R. and Cheryan, M. (1994)Enzyme Microbial Technol. 16, 104–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Reed, W. M. and Bogdan, M. E. (1985),Biotechnol. Bioeng. Symp. 15, 641–647.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ljungdahl, L. G., Carreira, L. H., Garrison, R. J., Rabek, N. E., and Wiegel, L. (1985)Biotech. Bioeng. Symp. 15, 207–223.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Wang, G. and Wang, D. I. C. (1984)Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 47, 294–298.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Baronofsky, J. J., Schreurs, W. J. A., and Kashket, E. R. (1984)Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 48, 1134–1139.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Herrero, A. A. (1983)Trends in Biotechnol. 1(2), 49–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Parekh, S. R. and Cheryan, M. (1990),Biotechnol. Lett. 12, 861–864.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Humana Press Inc. 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • Minish M. Shah
    • 1
  • Munir Cheryan
    • 1
  1. 1.Agricultural Bioprocess LaboratoryUniversity of IllinoisUrbana

Personalised recommendations