Skip to main content
Log in

Oral application ofEnterococcus faecium strain EE3 in healthy dogs

  • Published:
Folia Microbiologica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The ability of canine strainEnterococcus faecium EE3 to survive in healthy dogs and its effect on microbiological and biochemical parameters was determined. The strain was individually applied to 11 dogsper os at a dose of 109 CFU/mL (differed from 2 to 3 mL) for 1 week and persisted in feces for 3 months after cessation of its administration (reaching average concentration of 6.83±0.95 log CFU/g). Seven d after administration, a decrease in staphylococci and a significant decrease inPseudomonas-like bacteria was observed. On the other hand, concentration of lactic acid bacteria increased but the growth ofE. coli was not influenced. In the blood samples of dogs after 0–1 d (before application) and the blood samples 1 week after application, total lipids decreased in 8 dogs; the total protein also decreased. The levels of cholesterol were brought to the physiological level,i.e. in blood samples with low cholesterol values it increased to the physiological level and in those with high levels it decreased; cholesterol was not influenced in 3 dogs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Axelsson L.: Lactic acid bacteria: classification and physiology, pp. 369–383 inLactic Acid Bacteria. Microbiology and Functional Aspects. Marcel Dekker, New York 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baele M., Baele P., Vaneechoutte M., Storms V., Butaye P., Devriese L., Verschraegen G., Gillis M., Haesebrouck F.: Application of tDNA-PCR for the identification of enterococci.J.Clin.Microbiol. 38, 4201–4207 (2000).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Baillon A.M., Marshall-Jones V.Z., Butterwick F.R.: Effects of probioticLactobacillus acidophilus strain DSM 13241 in healthy adult dogs.Am.J.Vet.Res. 65, 338–343 (2004).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Belicová A., Križková L., Dobias J., Krajčovič J., Ebringer L.: Synergic activity of selenium and probiotic bacteriumEnterococcus faecium M-74 against selected mutagens inSalmonella assay.Folia Microbiol. 49, 301–306 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benno Y., Nakao H., Uchida K., Mitsouka T.: Individual and seasonal variations in the composition on faecal microflora of beagle dogs.Bifidobact.Microfl. 11, 69–76 (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  • Benyacoub J., Czarnecki-Maulden G.L., Cavadini C., Sauthier T., Anderson R.E., Schiffrin E.J., von der Weid T.: Supplementation of food withEnt. faecium (SF68) stimulates immune functions in young dogs.J.Nutr. 133, 1158–1162 (2003).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bujňáková D., Vlková E., Rada V., Kmeť V.: Aggregation of lactobacilli and bifidobacteria withEscherichia coli O157.Folia Microbiol. 49, 143–146 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flickinger E.A., Fahey G.C. Jr.: Pet food and feed applications of inulin.Brit.J.Nutr. 87 (Suppl. 2), S297-S300 (2002).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fuller R.: Probiotics in human medicine.Gut 32, 439–442 (1991).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Greetham H.L., Giffard C., Hutson R.A., Collins M.D., Gibson G.R.: Bacteriology of the Labrador dog gut: a cultural and genotyping approach.J.Appl.Microbiol. 93, 640–646 (2002).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kecerová K., Pristaš P., Javorský P.: Bacteriocin production and sensitivity.Folia Microbiol. 49, 172–174 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lauková A., Mareková M., Javorský P.: Detection and antimicrobial spectrum of a bacteriocin-like substance produced byEnterococcus faecium CCM 4231.Lett.Appl.Microbiol. 16, 257–260 (1993).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lauková A.: Identification of ruminal enterococcal and streptococcal flora of sheep.J.Appl.Anim.Res. 5, 63–71 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lauková A., Guba P., Nemcová R., Vasilková Z.: Reduction ofSalmonella in gnotobiotic Japanese quails caused by the enterocin A-producing EK 13 strain ofEnterococcus faecium.Vet.Res.Commun. 27, 275–280 (2003).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lauková A., Strompfová V., Simonová M., Marciňáková M.: Quantification and identification of lactic acid bacteria in Slovak meat products, pp. 133–136 inProc. Lectures and Posters of Hygiena Alimentorum XXVI, Vysoké Tatry (Slovakia) 2005.

  • Maia O.B., Duarte R., Silva A.M., Cara D.C., Nicoli J.R.: Evaluation of the components of a commercial probiotic in gnotobiotic mice experimentally challenged withSalmonella enterica ser. Typhimurium.Vet.Microbiol. 79, 183–189 (2001).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Marciňáková M., Strompfová V., Lauková A.: Feed — a source of potential probiotics, p. 34 inProc. Internat. Probiotic Conf., Košice (Slovakia) 2004.

  • Mareková M., Lauková A., De Vuyst L., Skaugen M., Nes I.F.: Partial characterization of bacteriocins produced by environmental strainEnterococcus faecium EK 13.J.Appl.Microbiol. 94, 523–530 (2003).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mego M., Májek J., Končeková R., Ebringer L., Čierniková S., Rauko P., Kováč M., Trupl J., Slezák P., Zajac V.: Intramucosal bacteria in colon cancer and their elimination by probiotic strainEnterococcus faecium M-74 with organic selenium.Folia Microbiol. 50, 443–447 (2005).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Salminen S., von Wright A., Morelli L., Marteuau P., Brassart D., De Vos W.M., Fonden R., Saxelin M., Collins K., Mogensen G., Birkeland S.E., Mattila-Sandholm T.: Demonstration of safety of probiotics — a review.Internat.J.Food Microbiol. 44, 93–106 (1998).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Scheurmann S.E.: Effect of the probiotic Paciflor (CIP 5832) on energy and protein metabolism in growing pigs.Anim.Feed Sci. Technol. 41, 181–189 (1993).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skřivanová E., Savka O.G., Marounek M.:In vitro effect of C2–C18 fatty acids on salmonellas.Folia Microbiol. 49, 199–203 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strompfová V., Lauková A., Ouwehand A.C.: Lactobacilli and enterococci as potential probiotics for dogs.Vet.Microbiol. 100, 107–114 (2004a).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Strompfová V., Lauková A., Ouwehand A.C.: Lactobacilli and enterococci — potential probiotics for dogs.Folia Microbiol. 49, 203–207 (2004b).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strompfová V., Marciňáková M., Simonová M., Bogovič-Matijašič B., Lauková A.: Application of potential probioticLactobacillus fermentum AD1 strain in healthy dogs.Anaerobe 12, 75–79 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weese J.S., Anderson M.E.C.: Preliminary evaluation ofLactobacillus rhamnosus strain GG, a potential probiotic in dogs.Can.Vet.J. 43, 771–774 (2002).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zentek J., Molitor D., Kamphues J.: Prüfung intestinaler Effekte eines Probiotikums (Enterococcus faecium) bei Hunden.Kleintierpraxis 43, 187–197 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Lauková.

Additional information

This work was supported by theSlovak Scientific Agency VEGA (project 2/5139/25).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Marciňáková, M., Simonová, M., Strompfová, V. et al. Oral application ofEnterococcus faecium strain EE3 in healthy dogs. Folia Microbiol 51, 239–242 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02932129

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02932129

Keywords

Navigation