Folia Microbiologica

, Volume 49, Issue 2, pp 139–142 | Cite as

Why does the establishment of the starch preferringEntodinium caudatum in the rumen decrease the numbers of the fibrolytic ciliateEudiplodinium maggii?

  • G. Bełżecki
  • R. Miltko
  • T. Michalowski
Article

Abstract

The effect of the establishment ofEntodinium caudatum on the population ofEudiplodinium maggii was examined in the rumen of three sheep fed a hay/ground barley diet. The cell concentration ofE. maggii were 15.9–38.5 and 11.7–12.4 × 103 cells per g of the rumen contents in the absence and presence ofE. caudatum, respectively. Microscopic analysis showed that starch was the only material engulfed by eudiplodinia irrespective of the time after feeding and the presence or absence ofE. caudatum. Up to 82–93 % of individuals contained starch grains whenE. maggii was the only ciliate species in the rumen; the proportion was 70–77 % after entodinia had been established. The largest quantity of starch engulfed byE. maggii ciliates was 12.4–19.0 and 6.7–7.6 mg per 100 mg protozoal dry mass in the absence and presence of entodinia, respectively. No visible engulfment of hay was observedin vivo in spite of the fact that hay particles up to 42 µm in length were dominating in rumen fluid. Ingestion of fresh particles of hay separated from the rumen digesta was found when they were added in the proportion of 1 g per 40 mL suspension of ciliates. No preferential intake of starch was observed whenE. maggii ciliates were incubatedin vitro with a mixture of hay and barley starch. It is suggested that competition for starch between the two ciliate species was responsible for the drop in the numbers ofE. maggii. This could result from a too low concentration of small particles of hay in the rumen fluid.

Keywords

Starch Amylose Rumen Fluid Rumen Content Ciliate Species 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Coleman G.S., Davies J.I., Cash M.A.: The cultivation of the rumen ciliatesEpidinium ecaudatum caudatum andPolyplastron multivesiculatum in vitro.J.Gen.Microbiol. 75, 509–521 (1972).Google Scholar
  2. Dehority B.A.: Microbial ecology of cell wall fermentation, pp. 425–453 in H.G. Jung, D.R. Buxton, R.D. Hatfield, J. Ralph (Eds):Forage Cell Wall Structure and Digestibility. ASA-CSSA-SSSA, Madison (USA) 1993.Google Scholar
  3. Dogiel V.A.: Monographie der Familie Ophryoscolecidae.Arch.Protistkd. 59, 1–288 (1927).Google Scholar
  4. Gibson T.S., Solah V.A., McCleary B.V.: A procedure to measure amylose in cereal starches and flours with concanavalin A.Am.J.Cereal Sci. 25, 111–119 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Hobson P.N.: Introduction, pp. 1–9 in P.N. Hobson, C.S. Stewart (Eds):The Rumen Microbial Ecosystem. Blackie Academic and Professional, London-Weinheim-New York-Tokyo-Melbourne-Madras 1997.Google Scholar
  6. Michalowski T.: Thein vitro digestion and fermentation of hay by the rumen ciliatesEudiplodinium maggii. Ann.Warsaw Agr.Univ.Anim.Sci. (Special Number), 138–147 (2001).Google Scholar
  7. Michałowski T., Muszyński P., Landa I.: Factors influencing the growth of rumen ciliatesEudiplodinium maggii in vitro.Acta Protozool. 30, 115–120 (1991).Google Scholar
  8. Michałowski T., Harmeyer J., Bełżecki G.: The importance of washing the omasum for successful defaunation of sheep.J.Anim.Feed Sci. 8, 611–619 (1999).Google Scholar
  9. Michałowski T., Rybicka K., Wereszka K., Kasperowicz A.: Ability of rumen ciliateEpidinium ecaudatum to digest and use crystalline cellulose and xylan forin vitro growth.Acta Protozool. 40, 203–210 (2001).Google Scholar
  10. Michałowski T., Bełżecki G., Pajak J.J.: Use of nylon bags of different porosity to study the role of different groups of rumen ciliates inin situ digestion of hay in sheep.J.Anim.Feed Sci. 11, 611–625 (2002).Google Scholar
  11. Williams A.G.: Metabolic activities of rumen protozoa, pp. 97–126 in J.V. Nolan, R.A. Leng, D.I. Demeyer (Eds):The Roles of Protozoa and Fungi in Ruminant Digestion. Penambul Books, Armidale (Australia) 1989.Google Scholar
  12. Williams A.G., Coleman G.S.:The Rumen Protozoa. Springer-Verlag, New York-Berlin-Heidelberg-London-Paris-Tokyo-Hong Kong-Barcelona-Budapest 1992.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Institute of Microbiology, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • G. Bełżecki
    • 1
  • R. Miltko
    • 1
  • T. Michalowski
    • 1
  1. 1.The Kielanowski Institute of Animal Physiology and NutritionPolish Academy of SciencesJabłonna near WarsawPoland

Personalised recommendations