Abstract
Kinetin at a concentration from 3.10-6 M to 1.10-3 M was applied to the plumule ofChenopodium rubrum plants during photoperiodic induction. Different levels of induction were compared (one and three short days). The higher concentrations of kinetin applied to induced plants inhibited flower formation. The rate of leaf initiation was increased under these treatments. Lower concentrations of kinetin (from 3.10-6 M to 1.10-5 M) usually promoted lateral bud formation and flowering. The step-wise application of kinetin revealed that the inhibitory effect on flowering had been restricted to the inductive period.
The effects of kinetin, benzyladenine and trans-zeatin were compared in plants partially induced by two short days. High concentrations always inhibited flowering. Benzyladenine was the most effective in this respect.
Root removal diminished the inhibitory effects of cytokinins on flowering as was stated with benzyladenine.
It is assumed that endogenous cytokinins play a role in the regulation of organogenetic activity of the stem apical meristem. Depending on the photoperiodic conditions, they presumably exert their activity by maintaining the vegetative functions of the apex.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Chailakhyan M. Kh., Lubarskaya, I. I.: [Effect of derivatives of nuclese acid metabolism on the growth and flowering ofPerilla nankinensis]In Russ. — Fiziol. Rast.8: 101–113, 1961.
Favard, A.: Mise en èvidence expèrimentale de l'action do cytokinines appliquèes au niveau do la tige de l'Ibenis sempenvirens L., But la croissance du bourgeon terminal et cello des divers axillaires. — Compt. rend. Acad. Sc Sèr. D (Paris)280: 1681–1684, 1975.
Harada, H., Bose, T. K., Cheruel, J.: Effects of four growth regulating chemicals on flowering ofPharbitis nil. — Z. Pflanzenphysiol.64: 267–269, 1971.
Henson, I. E., Warring, P. F.: Cytokinins inXanthium strumarium: A rapid response to short day treatment. — Physiol. Plant.32: 185–187, 1974.
Khatoon, S., SibidlovÄ F.: Effects of auxin and cytokinin on floral induction and differentiation of shoot apical meristem inChenopodium rubrum. — Acta Univ. N. Copernici, Ser. Biol. XVIII,37: 27–31, 1976.
Krekule, J.: Some hormonal aspects of floral initiation and differentiation. — Acta Univ. N. Copernici, Ser. Biol. XVIII,37: 9–18. 1976.
Krekule, J., SeidlovÄ F.: Treatments that enhance flowering in the post-inductive period of a short-day plantChenopodium rubrum L. — Ann. Bot.37: 615–623, 1973.
Lona, F., Bocchi, A.: Effetti morfogenetici ed organogenetici provocati dalla cinetina (kinetin) su piante erbacee in condizioni esterne controllate. — Nuovo G. Bot. Ital. N.S.64: 236 to 246, 1957.
Michniewicz, M., KamieŃ A.: Flower formation induced by kinetin and vitamin E treatment in long-day plantArabidopsis thaliana grown in short day. — Naturwissenschaften22: 623 to 624, 1965.
Miginiac, E.: Influence des racines sur le dèveloppement vègètatif ou floral des bourgeons coty lèdonaires chez leScrophularia arguta: role possible des cytokinines. — Physiol. Plant.25: 234–239, 1971.
Miginiac, E.: Flowering and correlations between organs inScrophularia arguta SOL. — In:Bileski, R. L., Ferguson, A. R., Cresswell, M. M. (ed.): Mechanisms of Regulation of Plant Growth. Bull. 12. Pp. 539–545. Roy. Soc. New Zeal., Wellington 1974.
Miginiac, E., Lacombe, N.: Influence do phénoménes d'antagonisme entre organe et entre régulateur stir le développement floral do bourgeons cotylédonaires chez leScrophularia arguta. Can. J. Bot.51: 465–473, 1973.
Nitsch, J. P., Nitsch, C., Rossini, L., Ringe, F., Harada, H.: L'induction floralein vitro. — In:Bernier, G. (ed.): Cellular and Molecular Aspects of Floral Induction. (Proc. Symp. Liege 1967). Longman, London 1970.
OgawA, Y.: Über die Wirkung von Kinetin auf die BlÜtenbildung vonPharbitis nil CHOIS. — Plant Cell Physiol.2: 343–359, 1961.
Oota, Y., Tsudzuki, T.: Resemblance of growth substances to metal chelators with respect to their actions on duckweed growth. — Plant Cell Physiol.12: 619–631, 1971.
Pharis,R. P.: Flowering ofChrysanthemum under non.inductive long days by gibberellins and N6-benzyladenine — Planta105: 205–212, 1972.
Přίvratský, J.: [contribution to the studies of the role of phytohormones in photoperiodically determined flowering in short-day plantChenopodium rubrum L.] In Czech. — M. Sc. Thesis. Charles Univ., Praha 1974.
Rossini, L. M. E.: Induction de la floraison chez des fragments de feuilles cultivésin vitro. — In:Bernier, G. (ed.): Cellular and Molecular Aspects of Floral Induction. (Proc. Symp. Liege 1967). Longman, London 1970.
Seidlová, F.,Krekule, J.: Effects of kinetin on the growth of apical meristem and floral differentiation inChenopodium rubrum L. — Ann. Bot. (in press).
Sotta, B., Miginiac, E.: Influence des racines et d’une cytokinine stir le développement floral d’une plante de jours courts, leChenopodium polyspermum L. — Compt. rend. Acad. Sci. (Paris) Sér. D.281: 37–40, 1975.
Teltscherová, L., Havlίčková H.: Reversal of the inhibitory effect of (2-chloroethyl) trimethyl-ammonium chloride; on the flowering ofChenopodium rubrum L. by kinetin. — Experientia23: 861–863, 1967.
Tse, A. T. Y., Ramina, A., Hackett, W. P., Sachs, R. M.: Enhanced inflorescence development inBougainvillea “San Diego red” by removal of young leaves and cytokinin treatments. — Plant Physiol.54: 404–407, 1974.
Van Staden, J., Wareing, P. F.: The effects of photoperiod on levels of endogenous cytokinine inXanthium strumarium. — Physiol. Plant.27: 331–337, 1972.
Van Staden, J., Davey, J. E.: Cytokinin translocation in xylem sap of herbaceous plants. — Z. Pflanzenphysiol.77: 377–382, 1976.
Venkataraman, R., Seth, P. N., Maheshwari, S. C.: Studies on the growth and flowering of a short-day plantWolffia microscopica. I. General aspects and induction of flowering by cytokinins. — Z. Pflanzenphysiol.62: 316–327, 1970.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Krektule, J., seidlová, F. Effects of exogenous cytokinins on flowering of the short-day plantChenopodium rubrum L.. Biol Plant 19, 142–149 (1977). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02926754
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02926754