Skewness, kurtosis, and black-scholes option mispricing
The Black-Scholes option pricing model assumes that (instantaneous) common stock returns are normally distributed. However, the observed distribution exhibits deviations from normality; in particular skewness and kurtosis. We attribute these deviations to gross data errors. Using options' transactions data, we establish that the sample standard deviation, sample skewness, and sample kurtosis contribute to the Black-Scholes model's observed mispricing of a sample from the Berkeley Options Data Base of 2323 call options written on 88 common stocks paying no dividends during the options'life. Following Huber's statement that the primary case for robust statistics is when the shape of the observed distribution deviates slightly from the assumed distribution (usually the Gaussian), we show that robust volatility estimators eliminate the mispricing with respect to sample skewness and sample kurtosis, and significantly improve the Black-Scholes model's pricing performance with respect to estimated volatility.
- Black, F. (1976): “Studies of Stock Price Volatility Changes”, Proceedings of the Journal of American Statistical Association, 177–181.Google Scholar
- Cox, J. (1975): “Notes on Constant Elasticity of Variance Option Pricing”, unpublished manuscript (Stanford University, Stanford, California).Google Scholar
- Geske, R. andR. Roll (1984): “Isolating the Observed Biases in American Call Option Pricing: An Alternative Variance Estimator”, unpublished manuscript (University of California, Los Angeles).Google Scholar
- Rosenberg, B. (1972): “The Behavior of Random Variables with Nonstationary Variance and the Distribution of Security Prices”, unpublished manuscript (University of California, Berkeley).Google Scholar
- Tukey, J. (1960): “A Survey of Sampling from Contaminated Distributions”, in Contributions to Probability and Statistics (Stanford University Press, Stanford, California).Google Scholar