Advertisement

Intereconomics

, Volume 23, Issue 4, pp 151–158 | Cite as

EC agricultural reform policy—The beginning of a new form of protectionism?

  • Monika Hartmann
  • Peter Michael Schmitz
European Community
  • 27 Downloads

Abstract

The European Community regards its current agricultural policy “reforms” as an adjustment to the reality of the market and hence as a contribution to easing the strains in world agricultural trade and reducing worldwide distortions in resource allocation. A detailed analysis gives ground for scepticism.

Keywords

Agricultural Policy Skim Milk Powder World Market Price Agricultural Trade Exchange Rate Divergence 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Cf. World Bank: World Development Report, Washington D.C. 1986, pp. 112 f.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Cf. OECD: National Policies and Agricultural Trade, Paris 1987, pp. 100 ff.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Cf. S. Tangermann, T.E. Josling, S. Pearson: Multilateral Negotiations on Farm-Support Levels, in: The World Economy, Vol. 10 (1987), No. 3, pp. 265–281.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cf. J. E. Meade: The Theory of Customs Unions, Amsterdam 1955.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cf. also A. Swingbank: European Community Agriculture and the World Market, in: American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Vol. 62 (1980), No. 3, pp. 426–433.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Cf. Bureau of Agricultural Economics: Agricultural Pollcies in the European Community—Their Origins, Nature and Effects on Production and Trade, Policy Monograph No. 2, Canberra 1985.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ibid. Cf. Bureau of Agricultural Economics: Agricultural Pollcies in the European Community—Their Origins, Nature and Effects on Production and Trade, Policy Monograph No. 2, Canberra 1985. p. 79.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Cf. P.M. Schmitz: External Effects of EC's New Agrimonetary System. Paper presented at the 13th European Seminar of the European Association of Agricultural Economists on “International Trade and National Agricultural Systems” in Varna/Bulgaria, September 28—Oktober 3, 1986, p. 5.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Cf. S. Tangermann: Guarantee Thresholds: A Device for Solving the CAP Surplus Problem?, in: European Review of Agricultural Economics, Vol. 1. 1 (1984), pp. 159–168.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    U. Koester and H. Terwitte: Breakthrough in Agricultural Policy, or Another Policy Failure?, in: INTERECONOMICS, Vol. 23 (1988), No. 3, pp. 103–108.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    M. Hartmann and P. M. Schmitz: Allokations- und Verteilungswirkungen von Quotenregelungen, In: W. Henrichsmeyer and C. Langbehn (eds.): Wirtschaftliche und soziale Auswirkungen unterschledlicher agrarpolitischer Konzepte, Schriften der Gesellschaft für Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaften des Landbaues e.V., Vol. 24, Münster-Hiltrup 1988.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Cf. E. Schmitt: Gegenwärtige und zukünftige Entwicklungen auf den EG-Märkten für pflanzliche Erzeugnisse und Konsequenzen für die BR Deutschland, in: Agrarwirtschaft, Vol. 37 (1988), No. 4, pp. 101–110.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    See, for example, U. Koester: Policy Options for the Grain Economy of the European Community. Implications for Developing Countries, Research Report 35, International Policy Research Institute, Washington 1982.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Cf. G. Schmitt and C. Thoroe: Flächenstillegungen: Lösung für die EG-Agrarprobleme?, in: Agra-Europe, Vol. 27 (1986), No. 9 of 3. 3. 1986, Sonderbellage, p. 12.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Cf. A. Basler: Auswirkungen einer möglichen EG-Importsubstitution bei Futtermittein auf die Entwicklungsländer, in: Landbauforschung Völkenrode, Vol. 37 (1987), No. 3, pp. 164–174.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Cf. U. Koester and A. Valdés: Reform of the CAP: Impact on the Third World, in: Food Policy, Vol. 9 (1984), pp. 94–98.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Cf. A. Basler, op. cit. Auswirkungen einer möglichen EG-Importsubstitution bei Futtermittein auf die Entwicklungsländer, in: Landbauforschung Völkenrode, Vol. 37 (1987), No. 3, p. 174.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© HWWA and Springer-Verlag 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • Monika Hartmann
    • 1
  • Peter Michael Schmitz
    • 1
  1. 1.Johann Wolfgang Goethe UniversityFrankfurtWest Germany

Personalised recommendations