Statistical Papers

, Volume 31, Issue 1, pp 181–194 | Cite as

Two-sided tests for change in level for correlated data

  • N. K. Nagaraj
Articles
  • 25 Downloads

Abstract

The classical problem of change point is considered when the data are assumed to be correlated. The nuisance parameters in the model are the initial level μ and the common variance σ2. The four cases, based on none, one, and both of the parameters are known are considered. Likelihood ratio tests are obtained for testing hypotheses regarding the change in level, δ, in each case. Following Henderson (1986), a Bayesian test is obtained for the two sided alternative. Under the Bayesian set up, a locally most powerful unbiased test is derived for the case μ=0 and σ2=1. The exact null distribution function of the Bayesian test statistic is given an integral representation. Methods to obtain exact and approximate critical values are indicated.

Keywords

Autoregressive Process Bayesian testing Likelihood ratio test Locally most powerful unbiased test Null distribution 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Anderson, T. W. (1984) An Introduction to Multivariate Statistical Analysis. 2nd ed. Wiley, New York.MATHGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bagshaw, M., and Johnson, R.A. (1975), “The Effect of Serial Correlation on the performance of CUSUM Tests II,” Technometrics, 17, 73–80.CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Box, G.E.P., and Tiao, G.C. (1965), “A change in level of a Nonstationary Time Series,” Biometrika, 52, 181–192.MATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chernoff, H., and Zacks, S. (1964), “Estimating the Current Mean of a Normal Distribution which is subjected to Changes in Time,” Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 35, 999–1018.CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ferguson, T.S. (1967) Mathematical Statistics. A Decision Theoretic Approach. Academic Press, New York.MATHGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gardner, JR., L.A. (1969), “On Detecting Changes in the Mean of Normal Variates,” Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 40, 116–126.CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gupta, S.S. (1963), “Probability Integrals of Multivariate Normal and Multivariatet,” Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 34, 792–828.CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Henderson, R. (1986), “Change-Point Problem with Correlated Observations, With an Application in Material Accountancy,” Technometrics, 28, 381–389.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Johnston, J. (1984) Econometric Methods. McGraw Hill, New York.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Johnson, R.A., and Bagshaw, M. (1975), “The Effect of Serial Correlation on the Performance of CUSUM Tests,” Technometrics, 16, 103–112.CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Krishnaiah, P.R., and Miao, B.Q. (1987), “Review About Estimation of Change Point,” Technical Report 87-48, Center for Multivariate Analysis, University of Pittsburgh.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Page, E.S. (1954), “Continuous Inspection Schemes,” Biometrika, 41, 100–115.MATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Sen, A., and Srivastava, M.S. (1975a), “Some One-Sided Tests for Change in Level,” Technometrics, 17, 61–64.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Sen, A., and Srivastava, M.S. (1975b), “On Tests for Detecting Change in Mean,” Annals of Statistics, 3, 98–108.MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Shaban, S.A. (1980), “Change Point Problem and Two-Phase Regression: Annotated Bibliography,” International Statistical Review, 48, 83–93.MATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • N. K. Nagaraj
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Mathematics and StatisticsUniversity of Maryland Baltimore CountyBaltimoreU.S.A.

Personalised recommendations