Ownership structure and returns to defensive stock repurchase

  • Criss G. Woodruff
  • Khalil M. Torabzadeh
  • James B. Ross
Article

Abstract

This study investigates the wealth effect of defensive common stock repurchase (CSR) on outside shareholders. It is found that the impact varies with the type of corporate control activity that precipitates the repurchase. Outside shareholders suffer wealth losses when a CSR announcement follows an unsolicited bid for the firm. The impact of the CSR announcement following a partial acquisition is negative but not as strong. However, outside shareholders benefit from CSR following antitakeover charter amendments. This study also documents a nonlinear relationship between managerial equity ownership and changes in the value of the firm at the announcement of a defensive CSR.

References

  1. Agrawal, Anup, andGershon N. Mandelker. “Large Shareholders and the Monitoring of Managers: The Case of Antitakeover Charter Amendments.”Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 25, no. 2 (June 1990): 143–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bagnoli, Mark, Roger Gordon, andBarton L. Lipman. “Stock Repurchase as a Takeover Defense.”The Review of Financial Studies 2, no. 3 (1989): 423–443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bagwell, Laurie Simon. “Share Repurchase and Takeover Deterrence.”Rand Journal of Economics 22, no. 1 (Spring 1991): 73–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bradley, Michael, andMichael Rosenzweig. “Defensive Stock Repurchases.”Harvard Law Review 99, no. 7 (May 986): 1378–1430.Google Scholar
  5. Bradley, Michael, andL. MacDonald Wakeman. “The Wealth Effects of Targeted Share Repurchases.”Journal of Financial Economics 11, no. 1–4 (April 1983): 301–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brown, Stephen J., andJerold B. Warner. “Using Daily Stock Returns: The Case of Event Studies.”Journal of Financial Economics 14, no. 1 (March 1985): 3–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dann, Larry Y., andHarry DeAngelo. “Corporate Financial Policy and Corporate Control: A Study of Defensive Adjustments in Asset and Ownership Structure.”Journal of Financial Economics 20, no. 1–2 (January–March 1988): 87–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. DeAngelo, Harry, andEdward M. Rice. “Antitakeover Charter Amendments and Stockholder Wealth.”Journal of Financial Economics 11, no. 1–4 (April 1984): 329–359.Google Scholar
  9. Denis, David J. “Defensive Changes in Corporate Payout Policy: Share Repurchases and Special Dividends.”The Journal of Finance 45, no. 5 (December 1990): 1433–1456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Harris, Milton andArtur Raviv. “Corporate Control Contests and Capital Structure.”Journal of Financial Economics 20, no. 1–2 (January–March 1988): 55–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Holderness, Clifford G. andDennis P. Sheehan. “Raiders or Saviors: The Evidence on Six Controversial Investors.”Journal of Financial Economics 14, no. 4 (December 1985): 555–579.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Israel, Romen. “Capital and Ownership Structures, and the Market for Corporate Control.”The Review of Financial Studies 5, no. 2 (1992): 181–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Jarrell, Gregg A., James A. Brickley, andJeffry M. Netter. “The Market for Corporate Control: The Empirical Evidence Since 1980.”Journal of Economic Perspectives 2, no. 1 (Winter 1988): 49–68.Google Scholar
  14. Jensen, Michael C.. “Agency Costs of Free Cash Flow, Corporate Finance, and Takeovers.”American Economic Review 76, no. 2 (May 1986a): 323–329.Google Scholar
  15. Jensen, Michael. “The Takeover Controversy: Analysis and Evidence.”Midland Corporate Finance Journal 4, (Summer 1986b): 6–32.Google Scholar
  16. Jensen, Michael C. “Takeovers: Their Causes and Consequences.”Journal of Economic Perspectives 2, no. 1 (Winter 1988): 21–48.Google Scholar
  17. Jensen, Michael andWilliam H. Meckling. “Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs, and Ownership Structure.”Journal of Financial Economics 3, no. 4 (October 1976): 305–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Leland, Hayne E. andDavid H. Pyle. “Informational Asymmetries, Financial Structure, and Financial Intermediation.”The Journal of Finance 32, no. 2 (May 1977): 371–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. McWilliams, Victoria B. “Managerial Share Ownership and the Stock Price Effects of Antitakeover Amendment Proposals.”The Journal of Finance 45, no. 5 (December 1990): 1627–1640.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Mikkelson, Wayne H. andRichard S. Ruback. “An Empirical Analysis of the Interfirm Equity Investment Process.”Journal of Financial Economics 14, no. 4 (December 1985): 523–553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Morck, Randall, Andrei Shleifer, andRobert W. Vishny. “Management Ownership and Market Valuation: An Empirical Analysis.”Journal of Financial Economics 20, no. 1–2 (January–March 1988): 293–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Patel, James M. “Corporate Forecasts of Earnings Per Share and Stock Price Behavior: Empirical Tests.”Journal of Accounting Research 14, no. 2 (Autumn 1976): 246–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Pindyck, Robert S. andDaniel L. Rubinfeld.Econometric Models and Economic Forecasts. Third Edition. New York: McGraw-Hill. (1991).Google Scholar
  24. Pound, John. “The Effects of Antitakeover Amendments on Takeover Activity: Some Direct Evidence.”Journal of Law and Economics 30, no. 2 (October 1987): 353–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Sinha, Sidharth. “Share repurchase as a Takeover Defense.”Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 26, no. 2 (June 1991): 233–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Stulz, René M. “Managerial Control of Voting Rights: Financing Policies and the Market for Corporate Control.”Journal of Financial Economics 20, no. 1–2 (January–March 1988): 25–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Vermaelen, Theo. “Common Stock Repurchases and Market Signalling: An Empirical Study.”Journal of Financial Economics 9, no. 2 (June 1981): 139–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • Criss G. Woodruff
    • 1
  • Khalil M. Torabzadeh
    • 2
  • James B. Ross
    • 2
  1. 1.Texas A&M UniversityCorpus Christi
  2. 2.Radford UniversityRadford

Personalised recommendations