Microgravity Science and Technology

, Volume 19, Issue 5–6, pp 113–117 | Cite as

Space sickness on earth

  • S. A. E. NooijEmail author
  • J. E. Bos
  • E. L. Groen
  • W. Bles
  • W. J. Ockels


During the first days in space, i.e., after a transition from 1G to 0G, more than 50% of the astro- (and cosmonauts) suffer from the Space Adaptation Syndrome (SAS).The symptoms of SAS, like nausea and dizziness, are especially provoked by head movements. Astronauts have mentioned close similarities between the symptoms of SAS and the symptoms they experienced after a 1 hour centrifuge run on Earth, i.e., after a transition from 3G to 1G (denoted by Sickness Induced by Centrifugation, SIC). During several space missions, we related susceptibility to SAS and to SIC in 11 astronauts and found 4 of them being susceptible to both SIC and SAS, and 7 being not susceptible to SIC nor to SAS. This correspondence in susceptibility suggests that SIC and SAS share the same underlying mechanism. To further study this mechanism, several vestibular parameters have been investigated (e.g. postural stability, vestibularly driven eye movements, subjective vertical). We found some striking changes in individual cases that are possibly due to the centrifuge run. However, the variability between subjects generally is very large, making physiological links to SIC and SAS still hard to find.


Head Movement Internal Model Motion Sickness Vestibular System Motion Perception 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Homick, J L.: Space Motion Sickness. Acta Astronautica vol. 25, p. 1259–1272 (1979)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Matsnev, E I., Yakovlevka, I Y., Tarasov, I K., Alekseev, V N., Kornolova, L N., Mateev, A D., Gorniladze, G I.: Space Motion Sickness: Phenomenology, countermeasures, and mechanisms. Aviat. Space Environ. Med. vol 54, p. 312–317 (1983)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Oman,C M., Lichtenberg,B K., Money, K E., McCoy, R K.: M.I.T./Canadian vestibular experiments on the Spacelab-1 mission: 4. Space motion sickness: symptoms, stimuli, and predictability. Exp. Brain Res. vol. 64, p. 316–334 (1986)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Homick J L., Reschke M F., Vanderploeg J M., in Results of the Life Sciences DSO’s Conducted aboard the space shuttle, 1981-1986. Bungo M W., Bagian T M., Bowman, M A,, Levitan, B M. (Eds.) Houston, Texas, p. 153–158 (1987)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ockels W J., Furrer R., Messerschmid E.: Simulation of space adaptation syndrome on earth. Exp. Brain Res. vol. 79, p. 661–663 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Groen, E L.: Orientation to gravity. PhD Thesis, (1997)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Irwin, J A.: The pathology of seasickness. The Lancet vol. 2, p. 907–909 (1881)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    James, W.: The sense of dizziness in deaf-mutes. Am. J. Otology vol. 4, p. 239–254 (1882)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Reason, J T., Brand, J J.: Motion sickness Academic Press, London, p. 83–101 (1975)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Rolnick, A., Lubow, R E.: Why is the driver rarely motion sick? The role of controllability in motion sickness. Ergonomics vol. 34, p. 867–879 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Stanney, K M., Hash, P.: Locus of user-initiated control in virtual environments: influences on cybersickness. Presence vol. 7, p. 447–459 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Bles, W., Bos, J E., De Graaf, B., Groen, E. L., Wertheim, A H.: Motion sickness: only one provocative conflict? Brain Res. Bull. vol. 47, p. 481–487 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Oman, C M.: A heuristic mathematical model for the dynamics of sensory conflict and motion sickness. Acta Otolaryngol. Suppl. 392, p. 1–44 (1982).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Bos, J E., Bles, W.: Modelling motion sickness and subjective vertical mismatch detailed for vertical motions. Brain Res. Bull. vol. 47, p. 537–542 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Bos, J E., Bles, W.: Theoretical considerations on canal-otolith interaction and an observer model. Biol. Cybernetics vol. 86, p. 191–207 (2002).zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Mayne, R., in: H.H. Kornhuber (Ed), Handbook of sensory physiology. IV-2 Vestibular system, Springer Verlag, Berlin, p. 493–580 (1974)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Bles, W., De Graaf, B., Bos J E., Krol, J R.: A sustained hypergravity load as a tool to simulate space sickness. J. Gravit. Physiol. vol. 4, p. 1–4 (1997)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Bles, W., Van Raaij, J.: Pre- and postflight (D-1) postural control in tilting environments. Adv Oto-Rhino-Laryng. vol 42, p. 13–17 (1988)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Bockisch, C., Haslwanter, T.: Three-dimensional eye position during static roll and pitch in humans. Vision Res. vol. 21, p2127–2137 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Furman, J M., Schor, R H.: Orientation of Listing’s Plane during static tilt in young and older human subjects. Vision Res. vol. 43, p. 67–76 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Haslwanter, T.: Mathematics of three-dimensional eye rotations. Vision Res. vol. 35, p1727–1739 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    De Graaf, B., De Roo, J.: Effects of long duration centrifugation on head movements and a psychomotor task. J. Vest. Res. vol. 6, p. 23–29 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Bles, W., De Graaf, B.: Postural consequences of long duration centrifugation. J. Vest. Res. vol 3, p. 87–95 (1993)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Clarke, A,: The collinearity between Listings’s plane and the vestibular system in mircogravity. Presented at the 15th IAA Humans in Space Symposium, Benefits of Human Presence in Space, Graz, Austria (2005)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Bos, J E., Bles, W., De Graaf, B.: Eye movements to yaw, pitch, and roll about vertical and horizontal axes: adaptation and motion sickness. Aviat. Space Environ. Med. vol 73, p. 436–444 (2002).Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Golding, J F., Stott, J R R.: Effect of sickness severity on habituation to repeated motion challenges in aircrew referred for airsickness treatment. Aviat. Space Environ. Med. vol. 66, p. 625–630 (1995)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Z-Tec Publishing, Bremen 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. A. E. Nooij
    • 1
    Email author
  • J. E. Bos
    • 1
  • E. L. Groen
    • 1
  • W. Bles
    • 1
  • W. J. Ockels
    • 2
    • 3
  1. 1.TNO Human FactorsZG SoesterbergThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Aerospace for Sustainable Engineering and TechnologyDelft University of TechnologyThe Netherlands
  3. 3.Institute of Energy and EnvironmentUniversity of GroningenThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations