, Volume 27, Issue 5, pp 882–894 | Cite as

Nitrate sources and sinks in Elkhorn Slough, California: Results from long-term continuous in situ nitrate analyzers

  • Thomas P. ChapinEmail author
  • Jane M. Caffrey
  • Hans W. Jannasch
  • Luke J. Coletti
  • John C. Haskins
  • Kenneth S. Johnson


Nitrate and water quality parameters (temperature, salinity, dissolved oxygen, turbidity, and depth) were measured continuously with in situ NO3 analyzers and water quality sondes at two sites in Elkhorn Slough in Central California. The Main Channel site near the mouth of Elkhorn Slough was sampled from February to September 2001. Azevedo Pond, a shallow tidal pond bordering agricultural fields further inland, was sampled from December 1999 to July 2001. Nitrate concentrations were recorded hourly while salinity, temperature, depth, oxygen, and turbidity were recorded every 30 min. Nitrate concentrations at the Main Channel site ranged from 5 to 65 μM. The propagation of an internal wave carrying water from ≈100 m depth up the Monterey Submarine Canyon and into the lower section of Elkhorn Slough on every rising tide was a major source of nitrate, accounting for 80–90% of the nitrogen load during the dry summer period. Nitrate concentrations in Azevedo Pond ranged from 0–20 μM during the dry summer months. Nitrate in Azevedo Pond increased to over 450 μM during a heavy winter precipitation event, and interannual variability driven by differences in precipitation was observed. At both sites, tidal cycling was the dominant forcing, often changing nitrate concentrations by 5-fold or more within a few hours. Water volume flux estimates were combined with observed nitrate concentrations to obtain nitrate fluxes. Nitrate flux calculations indicated a loss of 4 mmol NO3 m−2 d−1 for the entire Elkhorn Slough and 1 mmol NO3 m−2 d−1 at Azevedo Pond. These results suggested that the waters of Elkhorn Slough were not a major source of nitrate to Monterey Bay but actually a nitrate sink during the dry season. The limited winter data at the Main Channel site suggest that nitrate was exported from Elkhorn Slough during the wet season. Export of ammonium or dissolved organic nitrogen, which we did not monitor, may balance some or all of the NO3 flux.


Nitrate Concentration High Tide Marine Ecology Progress Series Internal Tide Tidal Prism 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature Cited

  1. Beck, N. G. andK. W. Bruland. 2000. Diel biogeochemical cycling in a hyperventilating shallow estuarine environment.Estuaries 23:177–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Beck, N. G., A. T. Fisher, andK. W. Bruland. 2001. Modeling water, heat, and oxygen budgets in a tidally dominated estuarine pond.Marine Ecology Progress Series 217:43–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Boynton, W. R., J. H. Garber, R. Summers, andW. M. Kemp. 1995. Inputs, transformations, and transport of nitrogen and phosphorus in Chesapeake Bay and selected tributaries.Estuaries 18:285–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Breaker, L. C. andW. W. Broenkow. 1994. The Circulation of Monterey Bay and Related Processes.Oceanography and Marine Biology Annual Review 32:1–64.Google Scholar
  5. Brewer, P. G. andJ. P. Riley. 1965. The automatic determination of nitrate in seawater.Deep-Sea Research 12:765–772.Google Scholar
  6. Caffrey, J. M. 2002. Biogeochemical Cycling, p. 211–233.In J. M. Caffrey, M. Brown, B. Tyler, M. Silberstein (eds.), Changes in a California Estuary: An Ecosystem Profile of Elkhorn Slough. Chapter 12. Elkhorn Slough Foundation. Moss Landing, California.Google Scholar
  7. Caffrey, J. M. 2003. Production, Respiration and Net Ecosystem Metabolism in U.S. Estuaries.Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 81:207–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Caffrey, J. M. andW. Broenkow. 2002. Hydrology, p. 31–46.In J. M. Caffrey, M. Brown, B. Tyler, M. Silberstein (eds.), Changes in a California Estuary: An Ecosystem Profile of Elkhorn Slough. Chapter 4. Elkhorn Slough Foundation. Moss Landing, California.Google Scholar
  9. Caffrey, J. M. andJ. W. Day Jr. 1986. Control of the variability of nutrients and suspended sediments in a Gulf Coast estuary by climatic forcing and spring discharge of the Atchafalaya River.Estuaries 9:295–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Caffrey, J. M., N. E. Harrington, I. Solem, andB. B. Ward. 2003. Biogeochemical Processes in a Small California estuary: 2. Nitrification Activity, Community Structure and Role in Nitrogen Budgets.Marine Ecology Progress Series 248:27–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Caffrey, J. M., N. Harrington, andB. Ward. 2002. Biogeochemical processes in a small California estuary: 1. Benthic flux and pore water constituents reflect high nutrient fresh-water inputs.Marine Ecology Progress Series 233:39–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Duke Energy. 2000. Final report: Evaluation of proposed discharge system with respect to the thermal plan.In Moss Landing power plant modernization project. Duke Energy Moss Landing LLC, Moss Landing, California.Google Scholar
  13. Glasgow, H. B. J. andJ. M. Burkholder. 2000. Water quality trends and management implications from a five-year study of a eutrophic estuary.Ecological Applications 10:1024–1046.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Heard, A. J. 1992. A Kinematic Model of Baroclinic Tidal Currents at the Head of Monterey Submarine Canyon. M.S. Thesis, San Jose State University, San Jose, California.Google Scholar
  15. Hubertz, E. D. andL. B. Cahoon. 1999. Short-term variability of water quality parameters in two shallow estuaries of North Carolina.Estuaries 22:814–823.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Jickells, T. 1998. Nutrient biogeochemistry of the coastal zone.Science 281:217–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Johnson, K. S. 2003. State of Technology in the Development and Application of Nutrient Sensors. Alliance for Coastal Technology Workshop, Nutrient_Sensor_Report.pdf)Google Scholar
  18. Kremer, J. N., W. M. Kemp, A. E. Giblin, I. Valiela, S. P. Seitzinger, andE. E. Hoffman. 2000. Linking biogeochemical processes to higher trophic levels, p. 299–341In J. Hobbie (ed.), Estuarine science: A synthetic approach to research and practice. Island Press. Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  19. Los Huertos, M., L. E. Gentry, andC. Shennan. 2001. Land use and stream nitrogen concentrations in agricultural watersheds along the Central Coast of California.The Scientific World Journal 1:615–622.Google Scholar
  20. Malzone, C. M. 1999. Tidal scour and its relation to erosion and sediment transport in Elkhorn Slough. M.S. Thesis, San Jose State University, San Jose, California.Google Scholar
  21. National Research Council (NRC). 2000. Clean Coastal Waters: Understanding and reducing the effects of nutrient pollution. National Academy Press, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  22. Nixon, S. W. 1995. Coastal marine eutrophication: a definition, social causes, and future concerns.Ophelia 41:199–219.Google Scholar
  23. Nixon, S. W., S. L. Granger, andB. L. Nowicki. 1995. An assessment of the annual mass balance of carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus in Narragansett Bay.Biogeochemistry 31:15–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Odum, H. T. andC. M. Hoskins. 1958. Comparative studies on the metabolism of marine waters. Publications of the Institute of Marine Science University of Texas, 5:16–46.Google Scholar
  25. Pennington, J. T. andF. P. Chavez. 2000. Seasonal fluctuations of temperature, salinity, nitrate, chlorophyll, and primary production at station H3/M1 over 1989–1996 in Monterey Bay, California.Deep-Sea Research 47:947–973.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Petruncio, E. T., L. K. Rosenfeld, andJ. D. Paduan. 1998. Observations of the internal tide in Monterey Canyon.Journal of Physical Oceanography 28:1873–1903.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Rabalais, N. N., R. E. Turner, D. Justic, Q. Dortch, W. J. Wiseman, andB. K. Sen Gupta. 1996. Nutrient changes in the Mississippi River and system responses on the adjacent continental shelf.Estuaries 19:386–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Risgaard-Petersen, N., T. Dalsgaard, S. Rysgaard, P. B. Christensen, J. Borum, K. McGlathery, andL. P. Nielsen. 1998. Nitrogen balance of a temperate eelgrassZostera marina bed.Marine Ecology Progress Series 174:281–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Rosenfeld, L. K., J. D. Paduan, E. T. Petruncio, and J. E. Goncalves. Internal Tide in a Submarine Canyon. Scholar
  30. Sakamoto, C. M., G. E. Friederich, and L. A. Codispoti. 1990. MBARI Procedures for Automated Nutrient Analyses Using a Modified Alpkem Series 300 Rapid Flow Analyzer. MBARI Technical Report No. 90-2. Moss Landing, California.Google Scholar
  31. Sitzinger, S. P. 1988. Denitrification in freshwater and coastal marine ecosystems: Ecological and geochemical significance.Limnology and Oceanography 33:702–724.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Seitzinger, S. P. 2000. Scaling Up: Site specific measurements to Global-scale estimates of denitrification, p. 211–240.In: J. E. Hobbes (ed.), Estuarine science: A synthetic approach to research and practice. Island Press. Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  33. Shea, R. E. andW. W. Broenkow. 1982. The Role of Internal Tides in the Nutrient Enrichment of Monterey Bay, California.Estuarine and Coastal Shelf Science 15:57–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Shumway, R. H. andD. S. Stoffer. 2000. Time Series Analysis and its Applications (Springer Texts in Statistics). Springer-Verlag, New York, New York.Google Scholar
  35. Smith, R. E. 1973. The hydrography of Elkhorn Slough, a shallow California Coastal Embayment. Technical Publication 73-2, Moss Landing Marine Laboratories, Moss Landing, California.Google Scholar
  36. Smith, C. J., R. D. DeLaune, andW. H. Patrick. 1985. Fate of Riverine Nitrate Entering an estuary: 1. Denitrification and Nitrogen Burial.Estuaries 8:15–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Trimmer, M., D. B. Nedwell, D. B. Sivyer, andS. J. Malcolm. 2000. Seasonal organic mineralization and denitrification in intertidal sediments and their relationship to the abundance of Enteromorpha sp. and Ulva sp.Marine Ecology Progress Series 203:67–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Varney, M. S. 2000. Chemical Sensors in Oceanography. Ocean Science and Technology, 1. Gordon and Breach Science Publishers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
  39. Vitousek, P. M., J. D. Aber, R. W. Howarth, G. E. Likens, P. A. Matson, D. W. Schindler, W. H. Schlesinger, andD. G. Tilman. 1997. Human alteration of the global nitrogen cycle: Sources and consequences.Ecological Applications 7:737–750.Google Scholar
  40. Weers, D. A. andK. S. Johnson. 1996. Solenoid pumps for flow injection analysis.Analytical Chemistry 68:2717–2719.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Wong, C. R. 1989. Observations of tides and tidal currents in Elkhorn Slough. M.S. Thesis, San Jose State University, San Jose, California.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Estuarine Research Federation 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Thomas P. Chapin
    • 1
    Email author
  • Jane M. Caffrey
    • 2
  • Hans W. Jannasch
    • 1
  • Luke J. Coletti
    • 1
  • John C. Haskins
    • 3
  • Kenneth S. Johnson
    • 1
  1. 1.Monterey Bay Aquarium Research InstituteMoss Landing
  2. 2.Center for Environmental Diagnostics and BioremediationUniversity of West FloridaPensacola
  3. 3.Moss Landing Marine LaboratoriesMoss Landing

Personalised recommendations