Estuaries

, Volume 27, Issue 5, pp 793–806 | Cite as

Modeling seagrass density and distribution in response to changes in turbidity stemming from bivalve filtration and seagrass sediment stabilization

Article

Abstract

In many areas of the North American mid-Atlantic coast, seagrass beds are either in decline or have disappeared due, in part, to high turbidity that reduces the light reaching the plant surface. Because of this reduction in the areal extent of seagrass beds there has been a concomitant diminishment in dampening of water movement (waves and currents) and sediment stabilization. Due to ongoing declines in stocks of suspension-feeding eastern oysters (Crassostrea virginica) in the same region, their feeding activity, which normally serves to improve water clarity, has been sharply reduced. We developed and parameterized a simple model to calculate how changes in the balance between sediment sources (wave-induced resuspension) and sinks (bivalve filtration, sedimentation within seagrass beds) regulate turbidity. Changes in turbidity were used to predict the light available for seagrass photosynthesis and the amount of carbon available for shoot growth. We parameterized this model using published observations and data collected specifically for this purpose. The model predicted that when sediments were resuspended, the presence of even quite modest levels of eastern oysters (25 g dry tissue weight m−2) distributed uniformly throughout the modeled domain, reduced suspended sediment concentrations by nearly an order of magnitude. This increased water clarity, the depth to which seagrasses were predicted to grow. Because hard clams (Mercenaria mercenaria) had a much lower weight-specific filtration rate than eastern oysters; their influence on reducing turbidity was much less than oysters. Seagrasses, once established with sufficiently high densities (>1,000 shoots m−2), damped waves, thereby reducing sediment resuspension and improving light conditions. This stabilizing effect was minor compared to the influence of uniformly distributed eastern oysters on water clarity. Our model predicted that restoration of eastern oysters has the potential to reduce turbidity in shallow estuaries, such as Chesapeake Bay, and facilitate ongoing efforts to restore seagrasses. This model included several simplifiying assumptions, including that oysters were uniformly distributed rather than aggregated into offshore reefs and that oyster feces were not resuspended.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature Cited

  1. Bayne, B. L., D. A. Brown, K. Burns, D. R. Dixon, A. Ivanovici, D. R. Livingstone, D. M. Lowe, M. N. Moore, A. R. D. Stebbing, andJ. Widdows. 1985. The Effects of Stress and Pollution on Marine Animals. Praeger Press, New York.Google Scholar
  2. Bayne, B. L. andR. C. Newell. 1983. Physiological energetics of marine molluscs, p. 407–515.In A. S. M. Saleuddin and K. M. Wilbur (eds.), The Mollusca, Volume 4. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  3. Brown, J., A. Colling, D. Park, J. Phillips, D. Rothery, andJ. Wright. 1989. Waves, Tides and Shallow-Water Processes. Pergamon Press, New York.Google Scholar
  4. Cohen, R. R. H., P. V. Dresler, E. J. P. Philips, andR. L. Cory. 1984. The effect of the asiatic clamCorbicula fluminea, on phytoplankton of the Potomac River, Maryland.Limnology and Oceanography 29:170–180.Google Scholar
  5. Coughlan, J. 1969. The estimation of filtering rate from the clearance of suspensions.Marine Biology 2:356–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dame, R. F. 1976. Energy flow in an intertidal oyster population.Estuarine and Coastal Marine Science 4:243–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dame, R. F. 1996. Ecology of marine Bivalves: An Ecosystem Approach, CRC Press, Inc., Boca Raton, Florida.Google Scholar
  8. Dawes, C. J., S. S. Bell, R. A. Davis, Jr.,E. D. McCoy, H. R. Mushinsky, andJ. L. Simon. 1995. Initial effects of Hurricane Andrew on the shoreline habitats of southwestern Florida.Journal of Coastal Research 21:103–110.Google Scholar
  9. Dennison, W. C., R. J. Orth, K. A. Moore, J. C. Stevenson, V. Carter, S. Kollar, P. W. Bergstrom, andR. A. Batiuk. 1993. Assessing water quality with submersed aquatic vegetation.BioScience 43:86–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Enriquez, S., M. Merino, andR. Iglesias-Prieto. 2002. Variations in the photosynthetic performance along the leaves of the tropical seagrassThalassia testudinum.Marine Biology 140:891–900.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fonseca, M. S. 1996. The role of seagrasses in nearshore sediment processes: A review, p. 261–286.In K. F. Nordstrom and C. J. Roman (eds.), Estuarine Shores: Evolution, Environments and Human Alterations. John Wiley and Sons, New York.Google Scholar
  12. Fonseca, M. S. andJ. A. Cahalan. 1992. A preliminary evaluation of wave attenuation by four species of seagrass.Estuarine Costal and Shelf Science 35:565–576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fonseca, M. S., J. S. Fisher, J. C. Zieman, andG. W. Thayer. 1982. Influence of the seagrassZostera marina on current flow.Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 15:351–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gambi, M. C., R. M. Nowell, andP. A. Jumars. 1990. Flume observations on flow dynamics inZostera marina (eelgrass) beds.Marine Ecology Progress Series 61:159–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Grady, J. R. 1981. Properties of seagrass and sand flat sediments from the intertidal zone of St. Andrews Bay, Florida.Estuaries 4:335–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Granata, T. C., T. Serra, J. Colomer, X. Casamitjana, C. M. Duarte, andE. Gacia. 2001. Flow and particle distributions in a nearshore seagrass meadow before and after a storm.Marine Ecology Progress Series 218:95–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Green, E. P. andF. T. Short. 2003. World Atlas of Seagrasses. University of California Press, Berkeley, California.Google Scholar
  18. Grizzle, R. E., V. M. Bricelj, andS. E. Shumway. 2001. Physiological ecology ofMercenaria mercenaria. p. 305–382.In J. N. Kraeuter and M. Castagna (eds.), Biology of the Hard Clam,Mercenaria mercenaria, Series 31. Elsevier, Amsterdam, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hawkins, A. J. S., B. L. Bayne, S. Bougrier, M. Heral, J. I. P. Iglesias, E. Navarro, R. R. M. Smith, andM. B. Urrutia. 1998. Some general relationships in comparing the feeding physiology of suspension-feeding bivalve molluscs.Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 219:87–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hemminga, M. A. andC. M. Duarte. 2000. Seagrass Ecology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K.Google Scholar
  21. Huettel, M. andG. Gust. 1992. Solute release mechanisms from confined sediment cores in stirred benthic chambers and flume flows.Marine Ecology Progress Series 82:187–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kemp, W. M., W. R. Boynton, R. R. Twilley, J. C. Stevenson, andL. G. Ward. 1984. Influences of submersed vascular plants on ecological processes in upper Chesapeake Bay, p. 367–394.In V. S. Kennedy (ed.), Estuaries as Filters, Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  23. Koch, E. W. 1996. Hydrodynamics of a shallow.Thalassia testudinum bed in Florida, USA, p. 105–109.In J. Kuo, R. C. Phillips, D. I. Walker, and H. Kirkman (eds.), Seagrass Biology: Proceedings of an International Workshop. Western Australian Museum, Perth, Western Australia.Google Scholar
  24. Koch, E. W. 1999. Sediment resuspension in a shallowThalassia test udinum bed.Aquatic Botany 65:269–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Koch, E. W. andC. J. Dawes. 1991. Ecotypic differentiation in populations ofRuppia maritima germinated from seeds and cultured under algal-free laboratory conditions.Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 152:145–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Koch, E. W. andG. Gust. 1999. Water flow in tide and wave dominated beds of the seagrassThalassia testudinum.Marine Ecology Progress Series 184:63–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. MacKenzie, Jr.,C. L. 1996. Management of natural populations, p. 707–721.In V. S. Kennedy, R. I. E. Newell and A. Eble (eds.), The Eastern Oyster,Crassostrea virginica. Maryland Sea Grant Publication, College Park, Maryland.Google Scholar
  28. Madsen, O. S. 1976. Wave climate on the continental margin: Elements of its mathematical description, p. 65–87.In D. J. Stanley and D. J. P. Swift (eds.), Marine Sediment Transport and Environmental Management. John Wiley and Sons, New York.Google Scholar
  29. McCormick-Ray, M. G. 1998. Oyster reefs in 1878 seascape pattern: Winslow revisited.Estuaries 21:784–800.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Moore, K. A., J. L. Goodman, J. C. Stevenson, L. Murray, and K. Sundberg. 1994. Chesapeake Bay nutrients, light and SAV in field and mesocosm studies. Final Report to U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Chesapeake Bay Program, Annapolis, Maryland.Google Scholar
  31. Moore, K. A., R. L. Wetzel, andR. J. Orth. 1997. Seasonal pulses of turbidity and their relations to eelgrass (Zostera marina L.) survival in an estuary.Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 215:115–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Newell, R. I. E. 1988. Ecological Changes in Chesapeake Bay: Are they the result of overharvesting the American oyster (Crassostrea virginica), p. 536–546.In M. Lynch (ed.), Understanding the Estuary: Advances in Chesapeake Bay Research. Chesapeake Research Consortium Publication 129, Gloucester Point, Virginia. Download from www.vims.edu/GreyLit/crc129.pdf.Google Scholar
  33. Newell, R. I. E. 2004. Ecosystem influences of natural and cultivated populations of suspension-feeding bivalve molluscs: A review.Journal Shellfish Research 23:51–61.Google Scholar
  34. Newell, R. I. E. andC. J. Langdon. 1996. Mechanisms and physiology of Larval and Adult feeding. p. 185–230.In V. S. Kennedy, R. I. E. Newell, and A. Eble (eds.), The Eastern Oyster,Crassostrea viginica. Maryland Sea Grant Publication, College Park, Maryland.Google Scholar
  35. Newell, S. Y., J. W. Fell, andC. Miller. 1986. Deposition and decomposition of turtlegrass leaves. Internationale Revue der gesamten Hydrobiologie.Berlin 71:363–369.Google Scholar
  36. Orth, R. J. andK. A. Moore. 1984. Distribution and abundance of submerged aquatic vegetation in Chesapeake Bay: An historical perspective.Estuaries 7:531–540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Peterson, C. H. 1986. Enhancement ofMercenaria mercenaria densities in seagrass beds: Is pattern fixed during settlement season or altered by subsequent differential survival.Limnology and Oceanography 31:200–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Phelps, H. L. 1994. The asiatic clam (Corbicula fluminea) invasion and system-level ecological change in the Potomac River estuary near Washington, D.C..Estuaries 17:614–621.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Posey, M. H., C. Wigand, andJ. C. Stevenson. 1993. Effects of an introduced aquatic plant,Hydrilla verticillata, on benthic communities in the upper Chesapeake Bay.Estuarine Coastal and Shelf Science 37:539–555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Preen, A. R., W. J. Lee Long, andR. G. Coles. 1995. Flood and cyclone related loss, and partial recovery, of more than 1000 km2 of seagrass in Hervey Bay, Queensland, Australia.Aquatic Botany 52:3–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Sanford, L. P. 1994. Wave-forced resuspension of upper Chesapeake Bay muds.Estuaries 17:148–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Sanford, L. P. 1997. Turbulent mixing in experimental ecosystem studies.Marine Ecology Progress Series 161:265–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Sanford, L. P. andM.-L. Chang. 1997. The bottom boundary condition for suspended sediment deposition.Journal of Coastal Research Special Issue 25:3–17.Google Scholar
  44. Sanford, L. P. andW. D. Grant. 1987. Dissipation of internal wave energy in the bottom boundary layer on the continental shelf.Journal of Geophysical Research 92:1828–1844.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Short, F. T. andS. Wyllie-Echeverria. 1996. Natural and human-induced disturbance of seagrasses.Environmental Conservation 23:17–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Smith, G. F., K. N. Greenhawk, D. G. Bruce, E. B. Roach, andS. J. Jordan. 2001. A digital presentation of the Maryland oyster habitat and associated bottom types in the Chesapeake Bay (1974–1983).Journal of Shellfish Research 20:192–206.Google Scholar
  47. Tilman, J. T., R. W. Curry, R. Jones, A. Szmant, J. C. Zieman, M. Flora, M. B. Roblee, D. Smith, R. W. Snow, andH. Wanless. 1994. Hurricane Andrew’s effects on marine resources.BioScience 44:230–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Twilley, R. R., W. M. Kemp, K. W. Staver, J. C. Stevenson, andW. R. Boynton. 1985. Nutrient enrichment of estuarine submersed vascular plant communities. 1. Algal growth and effects on production of plants and associated communities.Marine Ecology Progress Series 23:179–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. van Leulen, M. andM. A. Borowitzka. 2002. Comparison of water velocity profiles through morphologically dissimilar seagrasses measured with a simple and inexpensive current meter.Bulletin of Marine Science 71:1257–1267.Google Scholar
  50. Ward, L. G., W. M. Kemp, andW. R. Boynton. 1984. The influence of waves and seagrass communities on suspended particulates in an estuarine embayment.Marine Geology 59:85–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Widdows, J., M. D. Brinsley, P. N. Salkeld, andM. Elliott. 1998. Use of annular flumes to determine the influence of current velocity and bivalves on material flux at the sediment-water interface.Estuaries 21:552–559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Williams, S. 1988. Disturbance and recovery of a deep-water Caribbean seagrass bed.Marine Ecology Progress Series 42:63–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sources of Unpublished Materials

  1. Jordan, S. J. Personal communication. Director, Oxford Cooperative Laboratory, Maryland Department of Natural Resources, Oxford, Maryland.Google Scholar
  2. Sanford, L. P. Personal communication. Horn Point Laboratory, University of Maryland Center for Environmental Science, P.O. Box 775, Cambridge, Maryland.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Estuarine Research Federation 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Horn Point LaboratoryUniversity of Maryland Center for Environmental ScienceCambridge

Personalised recommendations