Geosciences Journal

, Volume 10, Issue 1, pp 85–89

Electrokinetically enhanced transport of organic and inorganic phosphorus in a low permeability soil

  • Goontaek Lee
  • Heemyong Ro
  • Sukyoung Lee
  • Sangmo Lee


The transport of P sources (organic and inorganic phosphorus) using electrokinetic process through a low-permeability soils was investigated. A series of batch experiments was conducted to construct the adsorption isotherms of KH2PO4 and triethyl phosphate (TEP) on kaolin soils. Approximately 60.3% of phosphorus from KH2PO4 was adsorbed within 24 hours, and the maximum adsorption (73%) was attained at 6 days after adsorption. In contrast, TEP showed no P adsorption in 7 days, thus suggesting an alternative P source that may maintain a favorable proportion of C∶N∶P through the effective delivery duringin situ bioremediation in low permeability soils. Experiments using electrokinetic process were carried out with electrokinetic reactor having a hydraulic conductivity of 1.99×10−7 cm s−1 for a 0.01 M NaCl aqueous solution. TEP and KH2PO4 were used as organic P source and inorganic P source, respectively, and introduced individually into a chamber near the platinum anode and near the platinum cathode, respectively. Potassium dihydrogen phosphate was not distributed uniformly along the soil column and most of transported phosphorus was changed to water-insoluble aluminum phosphate after 12 days of treatment, indicating the decrease of bioavailability of the phosphorus. In case of TEP, the advancing P front progressed with time, resulting in uniform P distribution through the kaolin column. In terms of transport, organic phosphorus, TEP, would be a more effective P source than inorganic phosphorus, KH2PO4, in electrokinetic enhanced bioremediation.

Key words

bioremediation electrokinetics (EK) phosphorus soil contamination triethyl phosphate (TEP) 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Brady, N.C. and Well, R.R., 2002. The nature and Properties of Soll. Pearson education (13ed), New Jersey, 277 p.Google Scholar
  2. Brown, R.A., McCarty, P.L., Semprini, L., Wilson, J.T., Kampbell, D.H., Reinhard, M., Bower, E.J., Borden, R.C., Vogel, T.M., Thomas, J.M. and Ward, C.H., 1996, Handbook of Bioremediation. Lewis Publishers, Florida, 227 p.Google Scholar
  3. Budhu, M., Rutherford, M., Sills, G. and Rasmussen, W., 1997, Transport of nitrates through clay using electrokinetics. Journal of Environmental Engineering, 123, 1251–1253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chang, S.C. and Jackson, M.L., 1956, Fractionation of soil phosphorus. Soil Science, 84, 133–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chilingar, G.V., El-Nassir, A. and Stevens, R.G., 1970. Effect of direct electrical current on permeability of sandstone cores. Journal of Petroleum Technology, 22, 830–836.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Environmental Protection Agency, 1985, Handbook of Remedial Action at Waste Disposal Sites (revised). EPA/625/6-85/006, Environmental Protection Agency, USA, 15 p.Google Scholar
  7. Haynes, R.J., 1984, Lime and phosphate in soil-plant system. Advances in Agronomy, 37, 249–315.Google Scholar
  8. Mitchell, J.K., 1993, Fundamentals of Soil Behavior. Wiley and Sons, New York, 228 p.Google Scholar
  9. Morel, J.L., Fardeau, J.C., Beruff, M.A. and Guckert, A., 1989, Phosphate fixing capacity of soils: a survey, using the isotopic exchange technique for soils from north-eastern France. Fertilizer Resources, 19, 103–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Rabbi, M.F., Clark, B., Gale, R.J., Ozsu-Acar, E., Pardue, J.H. and Jackson, W.A., 2000, In situ TCE bioremediation study using electrokinetic cometabolite injection. Waste Management, 20, 279–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Ro, H.M. and Cho, C.M., 2000, Diffusive phosphate transport in Alrich acidic porous cation exchange system. Canadian Journal of Soil Science, 80, 551–560.Google Scholar
  12. Rubeiz, I.G., Streohlein, J.L. and Oebker, N.F., 1992, Availability and fixation of phosphorous from urea phosphate incubated in a calcareous soil column. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 23, 331–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Sakadevan, K. and Bavor, H.J., 1998, Phosphate adsorption characteristics of soils, slagtros and zeolite to be used as substrates in constructed wetland systems. Water Research, 393–399.Google Scholar
  14. Sposito, G., 1989, The Chemistry of Soils. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 150–154.Google Scholar
  15. Suflita, J.M. and Sewell, G.W., 1991, Anaerobic Biotransformation of Contaminants in the Subsurface. EPA/600/M-90/024, Enviromental Protection Agency, USA, 11 p.Google Scholar
  16. Thevanayagam, Y.S. and Rishindran, T., 1998, Injection of nutrients and TEAs in clayey soils using electrokinetics. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 124, 330–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Thomas, J.M. and Ward, C.H., 1994, Introduced organisms for subsurface bioremediation. Handbook of Bioremediation, Lewis Publishers, Florida, 227–244.Google Scholar
  18. West, C.C. and Harwell, J.H., 1992, Surfactants and Subsurface Remediation, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2324 pGoogle Scholar
  19. Yeung, A.T. and Mitchell, J.K., 1993, Coupled fluid, electrical and chemical flows in soil. Geotechnique, 43, 121–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Zelina, J.P. and Rusling, J.F., 1998, Electrochemical remediation of soils. In: Meyers, R.A., Encyclopedia of Environmental Analysis and Remediation, Wiley and Sons, New York, 3, 1567–1583.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Goontaek Lee
    • 1
  • Heemyong Ro
    • 2
  • Sukyoung Lee
    • 3
  • Sangmo Lee
    • 1
  1. 1.National Instrumentation Center for Environmental ManagementSeoul National UniversitySeoulKorea
  2. 2.School of Agricultural Biotechnology, College of Agriculture and Life SciencesSeoul National UniversitySeoulKorea
  3. 3.R&D Environmental Engineering, Research Institute of TechnologySansung CorporationSeongnam, Gyeonggi-doKorea

Personalised recommendations