Geosciences Journal

, Volume 3, Issue 1, pp 43–48 | Cite as

Reconstruction of sedimentary basins formed on ductile substrata

Article
Received:
Accepted:

Abstract

A simple reconstruction technique for sedimentary basins formed on ductile substrata is introduced. This technique is based on backstripping method and assumes the preservation of bed lengths. First, a seismic section for a sedimentary basin is interpreted and converted into a depth section. The interpreted horizons are divided by tick marks, from the basin axis out toward the basin margins, into a number of equally-spaced line segments. Then, each sediment layer is removed by moving the tick marks on the lower boundary of the layer to the corresponding tick marks on the upper boundary, thereby preserving the bed lengths. Decompaction correction is made to add the amount of expansion after removal of each sediment layer. The seafloor or bathymetry is adjusted after decompaction correction. Backstripping, decompaction correction, and seafloor adjustment are repeated until the deepest sediment layer is left in the basin.

This technique is applicable to the analysis of monotonously subsiding basins formed by withdrawal of ductile substrata. It may also be applicable, to a limited extent, to intracratonic basins with simple subsidence histories.

Key words

balanced reconstruction backstripping decompaction correction salt-withdrawal basin 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Baldwin, B. and Butler, C.O., 1985, Compaction curves. American Association of Petroleum Geologists Bulletin, 69, 622–626.Google Scholar
  2. Bruce, C.H., 1973, Pressured shale and related sediment deformation: mechanism for development of regional contemporaneous faults. American Association of Petroleum Geologists Bulletin, 57, 878–886.Google Scholar
  3. Dix, C.H., 1955, Seismic velocities from surface measurements. Geophysics, 20, 68–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Dykstra, J., 1987, Compaction correction for burial history curve: application to Lopatin's method for source rock maturation determination. Geobyte, 2, 16–23.Google Scholar
  5. Gibbs, A.D., 1983, Balanced cross-section construction from seismic sections in areas of extensional tectonics. Journal of Structural Geology, 5, 153–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Jackson, M.P.A. and Galloway, W.E., 1984, Structural and Depositional Styles of Gulf Coast Tertiary Continental Margins: Application to Hydrocarbon Exploration. American Association of Petroleum Geologists, Continuing Education Course Note Series 25, 226 p.Google Scholar
  7. Jackson, M.P.A. and Vendeville, B.C., 1994, Initiation of Salt Diapirism by Regional Extension: Global Setting, Structural Style, and Mechanical Models. Report of Investigation, 215, Bureau of Economic Geology, University of Texas, Austin, 39 p.Google Scholar
  8. Price, N.J. and Cosgrove, J.W., 1990, Analysis of Geological Structures. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 502 p.Google Scholar
  9. Rowan, M.G., 1993, A systematic technique for the sequential restoration of salt structures. Tectonophysics, 228, 331–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Rowan, M.G. and Kligfield, R., 1989, Cross section restoration and balancing as aid to seismic interpretation in extensional terrains. American Association of Petroleum Geologists Bulletin, 73, 955–966.Google Scholar
  11. Schultz-Ela, D.D., 1991, Practical restoration of extensional cross sections. Geobyte, 6, 14–23.Google Scholar
  12. Spindler, W.M., 1977, Structure and stratigraphy of a small Plio-Pleistocene depocenter, Louisiana continental shelf. Gulf Coast Association of Geological Societies Transactions, 27, 180–196.Google Scholar
  13. Twiss, R.J. and Moores, E.M., 1992, Structural Geology. W.H. Freeman and Company, New York, 532 p.Google Scholar
  14. Woodward, N.B., Boyer, S.E. and Suppe, J., 1989, Balanced Geological Cross-Sections: an Essential Technique in Geological Research and Exploration. American Geophysical Union, Washington, D.C., 132 p.Google Scholar
  15. Worrall, D.M. and Snelson, S., 1989, Evolution of the northern Gulf of Mexico, with emphasis on Cenozoic growth faulting and the role of salt. In: Bally, A.W. and Palmer, A.R. (eds.), The Geology of North America—an Overview. Geological Society of America, Decade of North American Geology, A, p. 97–138.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of OceanographyKunsan National UniversityKunsanKorea

Personalised recommendations