Advertisement

Geosciences Journal

, 4:43 | Cite as

Fuzzy logic fusion of W-Mo exploration data from Seobyeog-ri, Korea

  • Sungwon Choi
  • Wooil M. Moon
  • Seon-Gyu Choi
Article

Abstract

There are continuing changes in the mineral exploration methodology, specially in the processing, analysis, and interpretation of geological exploration data. Many new data integration techniques based on GISs allow multiple sets of exploration survey data to be processed and fused quickly and precisely, so that the assessment on the final target(s) deposit can be more accurate than conventional approaches.

Raw exploration data gathered in field, or old archived exploration data in local government mining offices, are usually in differing data formats, which usually require editing and preprocessing of the data prior to an information representation step utilizing a chosen mathematical tool. In this study, we collected several sets of old geological exploration data, digitized, processed and geocoded each layer of spatial data, and then digitally represented using fuzzy logic for later fusion. In the Seobyeog-ri (Korea) study area, there was also and old tungsten mine, which we used as a ground-truthing control point. The target proposition adopted is that “there is a tungsten (W) and molibdenum (Mo) mineralization” in the study area and the mineral deposit model used was a simple skarn type contact mineralization.

Although several authors have recently used fuzzy logie approaches for fusion of mineral exploration data, selecting an optimum fuzzy operator has always been a difficult task. It has become apparent that fuzzy operators depend very much on the deposit model and types of spatial data to be integrated. In this study, three types of operators, fuzzy OR, fuzzy AND, and fuzzy γ-operators are tested and selected ones are used in combination, some in series and others in parallel. The unbiased processing results obtained in this study indicate that the most probable target area is clearly outlined in the vicinity of the old Sangdong tungsten (W) mine, and have confirmed our initial proposition. However, the initial assumption of a skarn type mineralization could not be further verified requiring further investigation.

Key words

fuzzy set theory data fusion mineral exploration GIS skarn fuzzy logic 

References

  1. An, P., 1992, Spatial Reasoning and Integration Techniques for Geophhsical and Geological Exploration Data. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada.Google Scholar
  2. An, P., Moon, W.M. and Rencz, A., 1991, Application of fuzzy set theory to integrated mineral exploration. Canadian Journal of Exploration Geophysics, 27, 1–11.Google Scholar
  3. An, P., Moon, W.M. and Bonham-Carter, G.F., 1994, Uncertainty management in integration of exploration data using the belief function. Non-Renewable Resources, 3, 60–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bonham-Carter, G.F., 1994. Geographic Information Systems for Geoscientists: Modeling with GIS. Pergamon Press, New York, 398 p.Google Scholar
  5. Bonham-Carter, G.F., Agterberg, F.P. and Wright, D.F., 1989, Weights of evidence modelling: a new approach to mapping mineral potential. In: Agterber, F.P. and Bonham-Carter, G.F. (eds.), Statistical Applications in the Earth Sciences. Geological Survey of Canada, Paper 89–9, p. 171–183.Google Scholar
  6. Dawson, K.M., 1996, Skarn Tungsten. In: Eckstrand, O.R., Sinclair, W.D. and Thorpe, R.I. (eds.), Geology of Canadian Mineral Deposit Types. Geological Survey of Canada, 8, 495–502.Google Scholar
  7. Farrar, E., Clark, A. and Kim, O.J., 1978. Scientific communications: age of the Sandong tungsten deposit, Republic of Korea, and its bearing on the metallogeny of the southern Korean peninsula. Economic Geology, 73, 547–566.Google Scholar
  8. Geological Society of Korea, 1961, Geological map sheet of Seobyeogri, #15. Geological Society of Korea.Google Scholar
  9. GRASS 4.1 Reference Manual, 1993, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Construction Engineering Research Laboratories, Champaign, Illinois, p. 422–425.Google Scholar
  10. John, Y.W., 1963. Geology and origin of Sandong tungsten mine, Republic of Korea. Economic Geology, 58, 1285–1300.Google Scholar
  11. Klepper, M.R., 1947. The Sandong tungsten deposit, southern Korea. Economic Geology, 42, 465–477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Lee, D.W. and Kim, S.W., 1965, Geological map of Seobyeog-ri sheet. Korea Institute of Geology, Mining & Materials.Google Scholar
  13. Lee, J.S., Yun, H.S., Jin, M.S., Kim, S.J. and Lee, C.Y., 1983. Geochemical Maps for Seobyeog Sheet in the Taebaegsan Mineralized Belt. Korea Institute of Energy and Resources.Google Scholar
  14. Meinert, L.D., 1992. Skarns and skarn deposits. Geoscience Canada, 19, 145–162.Google Scholar
  15. Mitasova, H. and Mitas, L., 1993a, Interpolation by regularized spline with tension: I. theory and implementation. Mathematical Geology, 25, 641–655.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Mitasova, H. and Mitas, L., 1993b, Interpolation by regularized spline with tension: II. application to terrain modeling and surface geometry analysis. Mathematical Geology, 25, 657–669.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Moon, W.M., 1990. Integration of geophysical and geological data using evidential belief function. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 28, 711–720.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Moon, W.M., 1993. On mathematical representation and integration of multiple spatial geoscience data sets. Canadian Journal of Remote Sensing, 19, 63–67.Google Scholar
  19. Moon, W.M., Jiang, W.W., So, C.S. and Yoon, S.T., 1998, Application of spatial data integration technique and utilization of SIRD Data for geological investigation (Hwanggang-ri, Korea). (In preparation)Google Scholar
  20. Park, Y.S., Koo, J.H., Suh, S.Y. and Choi, J.H., 1988, Aerial gamma ray and magnetic survey map. Korea institute of Energy and Resources.Google Scholar
  21. Zadeh, L.A., 1965. Fuzzy sets. Information and Control, 8, 338–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Zadeh, L.A., 1978. Fuzzy sets as a basis for a theory of possibility. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 1, 3–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Zimmermann, H. and Zysno, J.P., 1980. Latent connectives, human decision making. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 4, 37–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Earth and Environmental ScienceKorea UniversitySeoulKorea
  2. 2.School of Earth Environmental SciencesSeoul National UniversitySeoulKorea
  3. 3.Department of Earth and Environmental ScienceKorea UniversitySeoulKorea

Personalised recommendations