Changes of community characteristics of a broad-leaved-conifer mixed forest after selection cutting
- 44 Downloads
Abstract
The modification in structure, composition, and diversity, shrub, as well as herb strata ofPinus koraiensis-Tilia amurensis-Abies nephrolepis forest after 16a of selection cutting in northeastern China was studied. In the selection cutting forest, individuals with small DBH classes characterized size distribution. The virgin forest, on the other hand, was mainly composed of individuals having larger DBH classes. The density of dominant species and the species diversity at tree stratum in the selection-cutting stand was significantly larger than that of in the primeval forest. The shrub layer also showed a similar result. However, the herb layer had comparatively low species diversity. Large growing space and strong light in the artificial gaps must have provided opportunities for the species of shade tolerance or shade intolerance to establish on the stand. The juveniles of non-pioneer species, which were hardly found in highly shaded virgin forest, were also released by the disturbance. Regeneration in the selection-cutting stand was prompted by the disturbance, where the density of saplings occurred nearly 3 times as much as that in the virgin stand. The growth of shrub layer was improved due to the alteration in light condition. The projection volume of the herb layer was less affected. Restoration of a semi-virgin forest to the original status after selection cutting could be possible in several decades. However, for those subjected to clear cutting, it might take several centuries. In order to promote biodiversity, it is reasonable to practice selection cutting in communities for consisting of species with various levels of shade tolerance.
Key words
Changbai Mountain Selection cutting Regeneration Species compositionReferences
- Canham, C. D. 1988. Growth and canopy architecure of shadetolerant trees response to canopy gaps. Ecology. 69: 786–795.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Elliott, K. J. & Swank, W. T. 1994. Changes in tree species diversity after successive clearcuts in the Southem Appalachians. Vegetatio. 115: 11–18.Google Scholar
- Franklin, J. F. & Forman, R. T. T. 1987. Creating landscape patterns by forest cutting: Ecological consequences and principles. Landscape Ecology. 1 (1): 5–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Gilliam, F. S., Turrill, N. L. & Adams, M. B. 1995. Herbaceouslayer and overstory species in clear-cut and mature central appalachian hardwood forests. Ecological Applications. 5 (4): 947–955.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Huston, M. & Smith, T. 1987. Plant succession: life history and competition. The American Naturalist. 130: 168–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Liu, S. 1957. On the forest regeneration of Daxing'an Mountains and Xiaoxing'an Mountains. Scienta Sylvatica Sinica. (3): 263–280 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
- Liu, S. & Zhao, D. 1980. Growth promption of left-standing trees after selection cutting of Korean pine forest. In: Terrestrial Ecology. 16–25. Institute of Forestry and Soil Science of The Chinese Academy of Sciences (eds). Beijing: Science press (in Chinese).Google Scholar
- Magurran, A.E. 1988. Ecological diversity and its measurement. London: Croom Helm Limited.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Martinez-Ramos, M., Alvarez-Buylla E. & Sarukhan J. 1989 Tree demography and gap dynamics in a tropical rain forest. Ecology. 70(3): 555–558.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Meier, A. J. M., Bratton, S. P. & Duffy, D. C. 1995. Possible ecological mechanisms for loss of vernal-herb diversity in logged eastern deciduous forests. Ecological Applications. 5(4): 935–946.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Ohsawa, M., Nainggolan, P. H. J., Tanaka, N. & Anwar, C. 1985. Altitudinal zonation of forest vegetation on mount Kerinci, Sumatra with comparison to zonation in the temperate region of east Asia. Journal of Tropical Ecology. 1: 193–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Poulson, T. L. & Platt, W. J. 1989. Gap light regimes influence canopy tree diversity. Ecology. 70(3): 553–555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Primack, R. B., Ashton, P. S., Chai, P. & Lee, H. S. 1985. Growth rates and population structure of moraceae tree in Sarawak, east Malaysia. Ecology. 66: 577–588.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Qian, G. 1958. On the regeneration ofPinus koraiensis. Scienta Sylvatica. (3): 276–279 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
- Ren, Y. 1958. Preliminary discussion on the cutting and regeneration of Korean pine forest. Scienta Syvatica Sinica. (3): 264–268 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
- Saxena, A. K. & Singh, J. S. 1984. Tree population structure of certain Himalayan forest associations and implications concerning their future composition. Vegetatio. 58: 61–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Sundriyal, Sharma, E. R. C., Rai, L. K. & Rai, S. C. 1994. Tree structure, regeneration and woody biomass removal in a subtropical forest of Mamlay watershed in the Skkim Himalaya. Vegetatio. 113: 53–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Whitmore, T. C. 1989. Canopy gaps and the two major groups of forest trees. Ecology. 70(3): 536–538.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Williams-Linera, G. 1990. Vegetation structure and environmental conditions of forest edges in panama. Journal of Ecology. 78: 356–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Yang, H. & Xie H. 1994. Study on the restruction of disturbance history Pinus koraiensis mixed forest in Changbai Mountain. Acta Phytoecologica Sinica. 18(3): 208–217 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
- Yao G., Chi G. & Dong Z. 1985. Study on the relationship between light intensity and the growth ofPinus koraiensis. China Journal of Ecology. (6): 48–50 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
- Zang S. 1983. Succession of secondary forest in Changbai Mountain. In: Research of Forest Ecosystem. Vol. 3. Beijing: Chinese Forestry Press, 44–53 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
- Zhou X. 1982. Restoration of broad-leaved Korean pine forest by planting coniferous species in secondary deciduous stand. Bulletin of Northeast Forestry University (special issue). 18–28 (in Chinese).Google Scholar