Sexuality & Culture

, Volume 9, Issue 1, pp 88–97 | Cite as

Pedophilia, pejoration, and prejudice: Inquiry by insinuation, argument by accusation

  • David L. Riegel
Personal Perspective

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Adams, B. D. (1986). Age, structure, and sexuality. In E. Blackwood (Ed.),Anthropology and homosexual behavior (pp. 19–23) New York: Haworth PressGoogle Scholar
  2. Bernard, F. (1985).Paedophilia: a factual report. Rotterdam: Enclave.Google Scholar
  3. Bullough, V. (2000). The Pedophilia Smear. Retrieved from http://www. paedosexualitaet.de/lib/Bullough2000.html on March 23, 2004.Google Scholar
  4. Dallam, S.J., Gleaves, D.H., Cepeda-Benito, A., Silberg, J.L., Kraemer, H.C., & Spiegel, D. (2001). The effects of child sexual abuse: Comment on Rind, Tromovitch, and Bauserman (1998).Psychological Bulletin 127:715–733.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Dineen, T. (2000).Manufacturing victims: What the psychology industry is doing to people. Montreal: Robert Davies.Google Scholar
  6. Dribben, M. (1997). So what is he, a man or a boy?Philadelphia Inquirer, October 9, R1.Google Scholar
  7. Eglinton, J. (1964).Greek love. New York: Oliver Layton Press.Google Scholar
  8. Finkelhor, D. (1981). The sexual abuse of boys.Victimology 6: 76–84.Google Scholar
  9. Ford, C.S., & Beach, F.A. (1951).Patterns of sexual behavior. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  10. Liddell, H. (1888).Greek-English lexicon. New York: American Book Company.Google Scholar
  11. Mirkin, H. (1999). The pattern of sexual politics: Feminism, homosexuality, and pedophilia.Journal of Homosexuality 37 (2), 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Okami, P. (1990). Sociopolitical biases in the contemporary scientific literature on adult human sexual behavior with children and adolescents. In J.R. Feierman (Ed.),Pedophilia: Biosocial dimensions (pp. 91–121). New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
  13. Okami, P. (1991). Self reports of “positive” childhood and adolescent sexual contacts with older persons: An exploratory study.Archives of Sexual Behavior 20: 437–457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Ondersma, S.J., Chaffin, M., Berliner, L., Cordon, I., Goodman, G., & Barnewtt, D. (2001). Sex with children is abuse: Comment on Rind, Tromovitch, and Bauserman (1998).Psychological Bulletin 127, 707–714.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Rind, B., & Bauserman, R. (1993). Biased terminology effects and biased information processing in research on adult-nonadult sexual interactions: An empirical investigation.The Journal of Sex Research 30: 260–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Rind, B., Tromovitch, P., & Bauserman, R. (1998). A meta-analytic examination of assumed properties of child sexual abuse using college samples.Psychological Bulletin 124: 22–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Rind, B., Tromovitch, P., & Bauserman, R. (2000). A chronology and refutation of the attacks and a discussion of threats to the integrity of science.Sexuality & Culture 4 (2): 1–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Rossman, P. (1979).Sexual experience between men and boys. London: Maurice Temple Smith.Google Scholar
  19. Sandfort, T.G. (1987).Boys on their contacts with men: A study of sexually expressed friendships. Elmhurst, NY: Global Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  20. Sandfort, T.G. (1992). The argument for adult-child sexual contact: A critical appraisal and new data. In W. O. Donohue & J. H. Geer (Eds.),The Sexual abuse of children: Theory and research (Vol. 1, pp. 38–48). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  21. Tsang, D. (1981).The age taboo. Boston: Alyson Publications.Google Scholar
  22. Wilson, P. (1981).The man they called a monster. North Melbourne, Australia: Cassell Australia Limited.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • David L. Riegel

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations