Sexuality & Culture

, Volume 9, Issue 1, pp 28–48 | Cite as

Demographic characteristics of persons using pornography in three technological contexts

  • Timothy Buzzell


Significant attention is being given to the impact of the Internet on forms of “cybersex”. Few studies of cybersex have provided cross-sectional analysis of pornography use. Moreover, no analysis has contrasted pornography on the Internet with other technological forms. This is problematic when attempting to evaluate the impact technology has had on pornography use. In an attempt to address the question posed by Stern and Handel (2001), “does technology matter?” to pornography use, this study reports descriptive findings from the General Social Survey since 1973. Specifically, three technological contexts were operationalized from items in the GSS to describe pornography use and the demographic characteristics of persons who use pornography in three technologies: film, theater or VCR, or websites. A greater proportion of people, who reported use of pornography were males, young persons, and persons who lived in urban areas. Variations in other demographic characteristics such as employment status and income, however, suggested that technology does make a difference in pornography access and, thus, use.


Deviant Behavior General Social Survey Sexual Script Sexual Compulsive Technological Context 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Barron, M., & M. Kimmel. (2000). Sexual violence in three pornographic media: Toward a sociological explanation.Journal of Sex Research 37 (2).Google Scholar
  2. Binik, Y. (2001). Sexuality and the Internet: Lots of Hyp(othesis)—only a little data.Journal of Sex Research 38 (4): 281–282.Google Scholar
  3. Cooper, A., C. Scherer, S. Boies, & B. Gordon. (1999). Sexuality on the Internet: From sexual exploration to pathological expression.Professional Psychology: Research and Practice 30 (2): 154–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cooper, A., & E. Griffin-Shelley. (2002). Introduction: The Internet: The next sexual revolution. Pp. 1–15 in A. Cooper (ed.),Sex & the Internet: A guidebook for clinicians. New York: Brunner-Routledge.Google Scholar
  5. Cooper, A., J. Morahan-Martin, R. Mathy, & M. Maheu. (2002). Toward an increased understanding of user demographics in online sexual activities.Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy 28: 105–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Delmonico, D., & J.A. Miller. (2003). The Internete screening test: A comparison of sexual compulsives versus non-sexual compulsives.Sexual and Relationship Therapy 18 (3): 261–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dines, G., R. Jensen, & A. Russ. (1998).Pornography: The Production and Consumption of Inequality. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  8. Downs, D. (1989).The new politics of pornography. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  9. Dworkin, A. (1981).Pornography: Men possessing women. New York: Putnam.Google Scholar
  10. Durkin, K. & C. Bryant. (1995). “Log on to sex”: Some notes on the carnal computer and erotic cyberspace as an emerging research frontier.Deviant Behavior 16: 179–200.Google Scholar
  11. Gagnon, J., & W. Simon. (1973).Sexual conduct: The social sources of sexuality. Chicago: Aldine.Google Scholar
  12. Gagnon, J., & W. Simon. (1970). Prospects for change in American sexual patterns.Medical Aspects of Human Sexuality 4: 100–117.Google Scholar
  13. General Social Survey (1972–2002) [Cumulative data file]. Available from Survey Documentation and Analysis, SDA Archives, Berkley University, Scholar
  14. Hawkins, G., & F. Zimring. (1988).Pornography in a free society. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Holmes, R., R. Tewksbury, & S. Holmes. (1998). Hidden JPGs: A functional alternative to voyeurism.Journal of Popular Culture 32 (3): 17–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Jenkins, P. (2001).Beyond tolerance: Child pornography on the Internet. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Jones, S. (ed.). (1997).Virtual culture: Identity and communication in cybersociety. California: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  18. Karp, D. (1973). Hiding in pornographic bookstores: A reconsideration of the nature of urban anonymity.Urban Life and Culture 2: 427–451.Google Scholar
  19. Lane, F. S., III. (2000).Obscene profits: The entrepreneurs of pornography in the cyber age. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  20. Laumann, E., S. Ellingson, J. Mahay, A. Paik, & Y. Youm (Eds.). (2004).The sexual organization of the city. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  21. Laumann, E., J. Gagnon, R. Michael, & S. Michaels. (1994).The social organization of sexuality: Sexual practices in the United States. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  22. Linz, D., & N. Malamuth. (1993).Pornography. California: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  23. Lynxwiler, J., & D. Gay. (2000). Moral boundaries and deviant music: Public attitudes toward heavy metal and rap.deviant Behavior 21: 63–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Mahay, J., E. Laumann, & S. Michaels. (2001). Race, gender, and class in sexual scripts.” In E. Laumann & S. Michaels (Eds.),Sex, love, and health in America: Private choices and public policies (pp. 197–238). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  25. Mehta, M. (2001). Pornography in Usenet: A study of 9800 randomly selected images.Cyberpsychology and Behavior 4: 695–703.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Mehta, M., & D. Plaza. (1997). Content analysis of pornographic images on the Internet.The Information Society 13: 153–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Mitchell, K., D. Finkelhor, & J. Wolak. (2003). The exposure of youth to unwanted sexual material on the Internet: A national survey of risk, impact, and prevention.Youth and Society 34 (3): 330–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Norris, P. (2001).Digital divide: Civic engagement, information poverty, and the Internet worldwide. New York: Cambridge Unviersity Press.Google Scholar
  29. Peek, C., D. Wittred, & D.A. Gay. (1982). “Pornography: Important political symbol or limited political issues?”Sociological Focus 13: 41–52.Google Scholar
  30. Potter, G. (1989). The retail pornography industry and the organization of vice.Deviant Behavior 10: 233–251.Google Scholar
  31. Rimm, M. (1997). Marketing pornography on the information superhighway: A survey of 917,410 images, descriptions, short stories, and animations downloaded 8.5 million times by consumers in over 2000 cities in forty countries, provinces, and territories.Georgetown Law Journal 83(5): 1849–1934.Google Scholar
  32. Sherkat, D., & C. Ellison. (1997). The cognitive structure of moral crusade: Conservative Protestantism and opposition to pornography.Social Forces 75: 957–981.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Smith, T. (2003). American sexual behavior: Trends, demographic differences, and risk behavior. (GSS Topical Report number 25). National Opinion Research Center, University of Chicago.Google Scholar
  34. Smith, T. (1990). The sexual revolution?Public Opinion Quarterly 54: 415–435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Stern, S., & A. Handel. (2001). Sexuality and mass media: The historical context of psychology’s reaction to sexuality on the Internet.The Journal of Sex Research 38 (4): 283–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Sundholm, M. (1973). The pornographic arcade: Ethnographic notes on moral men in immoral places.Urban Life 2: 85–104.Google Scholar
  37. Thornburgh, D., & H. Lin (Eds.) (2002).Youth, pornography, and the Internet. Washington, D.C., National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  38. Tewksbury, R. (1990). Patrons of porn: Research notes on the clientele of adult bookstores.Deviant Behavior 11: 259–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Tibbetts, S., & M. Blankenship. (1999). Explaining citizens’ attitudes toward pornography: Differential effects of predictors across levels of geographic proximity to outlet sources.Justice Quarterly 16: 735–763.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. United States Commission on Obscenity and Pornography. (1970). Final Report. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  41. United States Department of Justice. (1986). Attorney General’s Commission on Pornography Final Report. Volumes 1 and 2. Washington D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  42. Waskul, D. 2002. The naked self: Being a body in televideo cybersex.Symbolic Interaction 25 (2): 188–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Weatherford, J.M. (1986).Porn row. New York: Arbor House.Google Scholar
  44. Weinberg, M., & C. Williams. (1980). Sexual Embourgeoisment? Social Class and Sexual Activity: 1938–1970.American Sociological Review 45: 33–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Williams, L. 1989 (1999).Hard Core: Power, Pleasure, and the “Frenzy of the Visible.” California: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Timothy Buzzell
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of History, Political Science & SociologyBaker UniversityBaldwin City

Personalised recommendations