Skip to main content
Log in

The ethnobotany oftagetes

  • Published:
Economic Botany Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Literature Cited

  1. Bailey, Liberty Hyde. 1961. The standard cyclopedia of horticulture. The MacMillan Co., N.Y. p. 3305.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bancroft, Hubert Howe. 1883. Native races. The History Co., San Francisco, California, v. III. p. 387.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Caius, J. F. 1940. The medicinal and poisonous composites of India. Jour. Bombay Natural Hist. Soc.41: 607.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Cordero, Luis. 1950. Botánica de las principales plantas ... en las provincias del Azuay y del Cañnar. Ecuder 2n, ed. Madrid, p. 81.

  5. Correa, M. P. 1926. Diccionario das plantas uteis do Brazil e das exoticas cultivadas. Rio de Janeiro, v. II.

  6. Dastur, J. F. 1957. Useful plants of India and Pakistan, D. B. Taraporevala Sons and Co. Ltd., Bombay, India.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Dragendorff, G. 1898. Die Heilflanzen der Verschiedenen. Vilker and Zeiten. Stuttgart, Ferdinand Enke.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Evans, I. B., Pole et al. 1918. Un. South Africa Dep. Agric, Local Ser.33: 1918;36: 1918;74: 1919.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Fernald, M. L. 1950. Gray’s manual of botany. 8th ed. American Book Co., New York p. 1514.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ferraro, Por Matilde. 1955. Las species Argentinas del generoTagetes. Boletin de la Sociedad Argentina de Botánica. v. VI(1): 30–39.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Freise, F. W. 1933. Plantas medicinaes Brasileiras.34: 254.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Gates, William. 1939. The de la Cruz-Badiano Aztec Herbal of 1552. The Maya Society, Baltimore, Md. p. 26, 78,79,91, 102, 103, 128.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Gerarde, John, and Thomas Johnson. 1927 reprint. The herball or general historie of plantes. Gerald Howe, London.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Greshoff, M. 1913. Buitenzorg Med. Dep. Landb. 17. Batavia; Kolff.

  15. Guenther, Ernest. 1952. The essential oils. D. van Nostrand Co., N.Y. v. II. p. 384; v. V. p. 477.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Guerrero, Leon. 1921. Medicinal uses of Philippine plants. Philip. Bur. Forestry Bull.22: 149–246.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Harlan, J. R. 1963. Biosystematics of cultivated plants. Unpublished.

  18. Harlan, J. R.. 1951. Anatomy of gene centers. Am. Naturalist85:97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Heiser, C. B. Jr., 1963. Indiana University, Personal Communication.

  20. Hernández, Francisco. 1942. Histora de la plantas de Nueva España. Imprenta Universitaria, Mexico, v. I. p. 90, 644.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Herrera, Fortunato L. July 28, 1921. Flora del Dept. del Cuzco. Univ. del. Cuzco, Peru. p. 206.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Hesse, O. 1893. Annalen der Chemie. 276: 87.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Kaplan, Lawrence. 1960. Historical and ethnobotanical aspects of domestication inTagetes. Econ. Bot.14:200.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Marroquín, F. H. 1957. Enfermedades de los Conquistadores. Ministerio de Cultura, Dept. Editorial. San Salvador. El Salvador, p. 187.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Martinez, Maximino. 1944. Medical plants of Mexico. 3rd. ed. Imp. M. Leon Sanchez, S. C. L. Mex., D. F., M. R. del Toro de Lazarin.

  26. Monnig, H. O. 1936. Onderstepoort Jour. Vet. Sci.7:419.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Nadkarni, K. M. 1927. Indian materia medica. Bombay.

  28. Oostenbrink, M., J. J. Jacob, and K. Kuiper. 1957. Over de waardplanten vanPratylenchus penetmns. Tijdschr. Plantenziekten.63 (6): 345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Pérez-Arbeláez, E. 1956. Plantas útiles de Colombia. Libreria Colombiana Camacho, Roldan, Bogotá, Colombia, p. 303.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Pittier, H. 1908. Plantas usuales de Costa Rica. H. L. and J. B. McQueen, Inc. p. 65.

  31. Potapov, A. I. 1934. New calorimetric methods for determining toxic Al. in soil. Doklady Akademii Nauk SSSR. Novaia Seriia, I (9): 589.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Quisumbing, Edwardo. 1951. Medicinal plants of the Philippines. Bureau of Printing, Manila, p. 1000.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Rose, J. N. 1890–1895. Report on a collection of plants. Contrib. U. S. Nat. Herb.1: 338.

    Google Scholar 

  34. —. 1899. Notes on useful plants of Mexico. Contrib. U. S. Nat. Herb.5 (4): 256.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Sahagún, Fr. Bernardino de. 1938. Historia general, de los cosas de Nueva España. Editorial Pedro Robredo. Mex., D.F., v. 3: #468. p. 234. #677. p. 273.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Uhlenbroek, J. H., and H. D. Bijloo. 1958. Investigations on nematocides. #1. Isolation and structure of a nematicidal principle occuring inTagetes roots. Rec. Trav. Chim. Pays-Bas et Belgique77 (11): 1004.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Uphof, J. C. 1959. Dictionary of economic plants. Weinheim, H. R. Engelmann. Hafner Publ. Co. New York. p. 353.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Visser, T., and M. K. Vythilingam. 1959. The effect of marigold and some other crops on the eelworm populations of tea soils. Tea Quart.30(1): 30.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Watt, J. M., and M. G. Breyer-Brandwijk. 1962. The medicinal and poisonous plants of Southern and Eastern Africa. E. S. Livingstone, Ltd. London, p. 293, 488, 983, 1145.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Webb, L. J. 1948. Coun. Sci. Industr. Res. Aust. Bull. 232.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Neher, R.T. The ethnobotany oftagetes . Econ Bot 22, 317–325 (1968). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02908126

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02908126

Keywords

Navigation