, Volume 27, Issue 4, pp 740–751 | Cite as

Nekton habitat quality at shallow water sites in two Rhode Island coastal systems

  • Lesa Meng
  • Giancarlo Cicchetti
  • Marnita Chintala


We evaluated nekton habitat quality at 5 shallow-water sites in 2 Rhode Island systems by comparing nekton densities and biomass, number of species, prey availability and feeding, and abundance of winter flounderPseudopleuronectes americanus. Nekton density and biomass were compared with a 1.75-m2 drop ring at 3 sites (marsh, intertidal, and subtidal) in Coggeshall Cove in Narragansett Bay and two subtidal sites (eelgrass and macroalgae) in Ninigret Pond, a coastal lagoon. We collected benthic core samples and examined nekton stomach contents in Coggeshall Cove. We identified 16 species of fish, 16 species of crabs, and 3 species of shrimp in our drop ring samples. A multivariate analysis of variance indicated differences in total nekton, invertebrates, fish, and winter flounder across the five sites. Relative abundance of benthic invertebrate taxa did not match relative abundance of prey taxa identified in the stomachs. Nonmetric multidimensional scaling plots showed groupings in nekton and benthic invertebrate prey assemblages among subtidal, intertidal, and marsh sites in Coggeshall Cove. Stepwise multiple regression indicated that biomass of macroalgae was the most important variable predicting abundance of nekton in Coggeshall Cove, followed by elevation and depth. In Rhode Island systems that do not experience chronic hypoxia, macroalgae adds structure to unvegetated areas and provides refuge for small nekton. All sites sampled were characterized by high abundance and diversity of nekton pointing to the importance of shallow inshore areas for production of fishes and decapods. Measurements of habitat quality should include assessment of the functional significance of a habitat (this can be done by comparing nekton numbers and biomass), some measure of habitat diversity, and a consideration of how habitat quality varies in time and space.


Macroalgae Habitat Quality Marsh Surface Grass Shrimp Green Crab 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature Cited

  1. Able, K.W., J.P. Manderson, andA.L. Studholme. 1999. Habitat quality for shallow water fishes in an urban estuary: The effects of man-made structures on growth.Marine Ecology Progress Series 187:227–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ayvazian, S.G., L.A. Deegan, andJ.T. Finn. 1992. Comparison of habitat use by estuarine fish assemblages in the Acadian and Virginian zoogeographic provinces.Estuaries 15:368–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bagenal, T. (ed.). 1978. Methods for Assessment of Fish Production in Fresh Waters. IBP Handbook No. 3. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford, U.K.Google Scholar
  4. Baltz, D.M., C. Rakocinski, andJ.W. Fleeger. 1993. Microhabitat use by marsh-edge fishes in a Louisiana estuary.Environmental Biology of Fishes 36:109–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Beck, M.W., K.L. Heck, Jr.,K.W. Able, D.L. Childers, D.B. Eggleston, B.M. Gillanders, B. Halpern, C.G. Hays, K. Hoshino, T.J. Minello, R.J. Orth, P.F. Sheridan, andM.P. Weinstein. 2001. The identification, conservation, and management of estuarine and marine nurseries for fish and invertebrates.Biocience 51:633–641.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bell, J.D. andA.S. Steffe. 1988. Location of eelgrass beds in estuaries: Effects on associated fish and decapods.Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 122:127–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Beutel, T.S., J.S. Beeton, andG.S. Baxter. 1999. Building better wildlife-habitat models.Ecography 22:219–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Castellanos, D.L. andL.P. Rozas. 2001. Nekton use of submerged aquatic vegetation, marsh, and shallow unvegetated botton in the Atchafalaya River Delta, a Louisiana tidal fresh-water ecosystem.Estuaries 24:184–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cicchetti, G. 1998. Habitat use, secondary production, and trophic export by salt nekton in shallow water. Ph.D. Dissertation, The College of William and Mary, Williamsburg, Virginia.Google Scholar
  10. Clarke, K.R. andR.M. Warwick. 2001. Change in Marine Communities: An Approach to Statistical Analysis and Interpretation. PRIMER-E, Ltd., Plymouth, U.K.Google Scholar
  11. Deegan, L.A. andJ.W. Day. 1984. Estuarine fishery habitat requirements, p. 315–336.In B. Copeland, K. Hart, N. Davis, and S. Friday (eds.), Research for Managing the Nation's Estuaries. UNC Sea Grant Publication UNC-4-08. North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina.Google Scholar
  12. Dorf, B.A. andJ.C. Powell. 1997. Distribution, abundance, and habitat characteristics of juvenile tautog (Tautoga onitis, Family Labridae) in Narragansett Bay, Rhode Island, 1988–1992).Estuaries 20:589–600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Duffy-Anderson, J.T. andK.W. Able. 1999. Effects of municipal piers on the growth of juvenile fishes in the Hudson River estuary: A study across a pier edge.Marine Biology 133:409–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Ferrell, D.J. andJ.D. Bell. 1991. Differences in assemblages of fish associated withZostera capricornia and bare sand over a large spatial scale.Marine Ecology Progress Series 72:15–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Heck, Jr.,K.L., K.W. Able, M.P. Fahay, andC.T. Roman. 1989. Fishes and decapod crustaceans of Cape Cod eelgrass meadows: Species composition, seasonal abundance patterns and comparisons with unvegetated substrates.Estuaries 12:59–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Heck, Jr.,K.L. andR.J. Orth. 1980. Seagrass habitats: the role of habitat complexity, competition and predation in structuring associated fish and motile macroinvertebrate assemblages, p. 449–464.In V.S. Kennedy (ed.), Estuarine Perspectives. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  17. Keller, A.A., G. Klein-MacPhee, andJ.St. Onge-Burns. 1999. Abundance and distribution of ichthyoplankton in Narragansett Bay, Rhode Island.Estuaries 22:149–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kionka, B.C. andJ.T. Windell. 1972. Differential movement of digestible and indigestible food fractions in rainbow trout,Salmo gairdneri.Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 101: 112–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lankford, Jr.,T.E. andT.E. Targett. 1997. Selective predation by juvenile weakfish: Post-consumptive constraints on energy maximization and growth.Ecology 78:1049–1061.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lee, V. andS. Olsen. 1985. Eutrophication and management initiatives for the control of nutrient inputs to Rhode Island coastal lagoons.Estuaries 8:191–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Manderson, J.P., B.A. Phelan, C. Meise, L.L. Stehlik, A.J. Bejda, J. Pessutti, L. Arlen, A. Draxler, andA.W. Stoner. 2002. Spatial dynamics of habitat suitability for the growth of newly settled winter flounderPseudopleuronectes americanus in an estuarine nursery.Marine Ecology Progress Series 228:227–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. McIvor, C.C. andW.E. Odum. 1988. Food, predation risk, and microhabitat selection in a marsh fish assemblage.Ecology 69: 1341–1351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Meng, L., C. Gray, B. Taplin, andE. Kupcha. 2000. Using winter flounder growth rates to assess habitat quality in Rhode Island's coastal lagoons.Marine Ecology Progress Series 201:287–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Meng, L., C.D. Orphanides, andJ.C. Powell. 2002. Use of a fish index to assess habitat quality in Narragansett Bay, Rhode Island.Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 131:731–742.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Meng, L. andJ.C. Powell. 1999. Linking juvenile fish and their habitats: An example from Narragansett Bay, Rhode Island.Estuaries 22:905–916.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Meng, L., J.C. Powell, andB. Taplin. 2001. Using winter flounder growth rates to assess habitat quality across an anthropogenic gradient in Narragansett Bay, Rhode Island.Estuaries 24:576–584.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Minello, T.J. 1999. Nekton densities in shallow estuarine habitats of Texas and Louisiana and the identification of essential fish habitat.American Fisheries Society Symposium 22:43–75.Google Scholar
  28. Nixon, S.W. and V. Lee. 1979. Spatial and temporal pollution gradients in Narragansett Bay, p. 1–13.In International Council for the Exploration of the Sea, 1979/E56. Warsaw, Poland.Google Scholar
  29. Olsen, S., D.D. Robadue, Jr., andV. Lee. 1980. An Interpretive Atlas of Narragansett Bay. Marine Bulletin 40. Coastal Resources Center, University of Rhode Island, Narragansett, Rhode Island.Google Scholar
  30. Oviatt, C.A. andS.W. Nixon. 1973. The demersal fish of Narragansett Bay: An analysis of community structure, distribution and abundance.Estuarine and Coastal Marine Science 1: 361–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Oviatt, C.A., M.E. Pilson, S.W. Nixon, J.B. Frithsen, D.T. Rudnick, J.R. Kelly, J.F. Grassle, andJ.P. Grassle. 1984. Recovery of a polluted estuarine system: A mesocosm experiment.Marine Ecology Progress Series 16:203–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Phelan, B.A., R. Goldberg, A.J. Bejda, J. Pereira, S. Hagan, P. Clark, A.L. Studholme, A. Calabrese, andK.W. Able. 2000. Habitat specific growth of young-of-the-year winter flounder (Pseudopleuronectes americanus) and tautog (Tautoga onitis) in three Northeastern U.S. estuaries.Journal of Experimental Marine Biology 247:1–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Rountree, R.A. andK.W. Able. 1997. Nocturnal fish use of New Jersey marsh creek and adjacent bay shoal habitats.Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 44:703–711.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Rozas, L.P. andT.J. Minello. 1997. Estimating densities of small fishes and decapod crustaceans in shallow estuarine habitats: A review of sampling design with focus on gear selection.Estuaries 20:199–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Rozas, L.P. andT.J. Minello. 1998. Nekton use of salt marsh, seagrass, and nonvegetated habitats in a South Texas (USA) estuary.Bulletin of Marine Science 63:481–501.Google Scholar
  36. Rozas, L.P. andR.J. Zimmerman. 2000. Small-scale patterns of nekton use among marsh and adjacent shallow nonvegetated areas of the Galveston Bay estuary, Texas (USA).Marine Ecology Progress Series 193:217–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Rydene, D.A. andR.E. Matheson. 2003. Diurnal fish density in relation to seagrass and drift algae cover in Tampa Bay, Florida.Gulf of Mexico Science 21:35–58.Google Scholar
  38. SAS Institute. 1988. SAS User's Guide, Version 6.03. SAS Institute, Cary, North Carolina.Google Scholar
  39. Sogard, S.M. 1992. Variability in growth rates of juvenile fishes in different estuarine habitats.Marine Ecology Progress Series 85: 35–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Sogard, S.M. andK.W. Able. 1991. A comparison of eelgrass, sea lettuce, macroalgae, and marsh creeks as habitats for epibenthic fishes and decapods.Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 33:501–519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Swenson, W.A. andL.L. Smith, Jr. 1973. Gastric digestion, food consumption, feeding periodicity, and food conversion efficiency in walleye (Stizostedion vitreum vitreum).Journal of the Fisheries Research Board of Canada 30:1327–1336.Google Scholar
  42. Szedlmayer, S.T. andK.W. Able. 1996. Patterns of seasonal availability and habitat use by fishes and decapod crustaceans in a southern New Jersey estuary.Estuaries 19:697–709.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Thayer, G.W., W.E. Schaaf, J.W. Angelovic, andM.W. LaCroix. 1973. Caloric measurements of some estuarine organisms.U.S. National Marine Fisheries Service Fishery Bulletin 71: 289–296.Google Scholar
  44. Valente, R.M., D.C. Rhoads, J.D. Germano, andV.J. Cabelli. 1992. Mapping of benthic enrichment patterns in Narragansett Bay, Rhode Island.Estuaries 15:1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Valiela, I., K. Foreman, M. LaMontagne, D. Hersh, J. Costa, P. Peckol, B. DeMeo-Andreson, C. D'Avanzo, M. Babione, C. Sham, J. Brawley, andK. Lajtha. 1992. Couplings of watersheds and coastal waters: Sources and consequences of nutrient enrichment in Waquoit Bay, Massachusetts.Estuaries 15: 443–457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Weinstein, M.P. 1979. Shallow marsh habitats as primary nurseries for fishes and shellfish, Cape Fear River, North Carolina.U.S. National Marine Fisheries Service Fishery Bulletin 77:339–357.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Estuarine Research Federation 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lesa Meng
    • 1
  • Giancarlo Cicchetti
    • 1
  • Marnita Chintala
    • 1
  1. 1.Office of Research and Development, National Health and Environmental Effects Laboratory, Atlantic Ecology DivisionU.S. Environmental Protection AgencyNarragansett

Personalised recommendations