, 27:728

Assessing the use of saltmarsh flats by fish in a temperate Australian embayment



Little is known about the importance of salmarshes to juvenile and adult fishes in temperate Australia. We assessed diel and feeding patterns of fish inhabiting saltmarsh in a sheltered embayment along the coast of Victoria, Australia, between October 2002 and May 2003. The saltmarsh flat was generally only inundated during low-pressure weather systems (barometric pressure <1,013 hP). Fish were sampled over the saltmarsh flats using fyke and seine nets. A total of 2,047 individuals (10 species, including juveniles and adults) were caught.Atherinasoma microstoma was most abundant (fyke [F], μ=1.6 fish h−1; seine [S], μ=28.2 fish shot−1), followed byFavonigobius, lateralis (F: 0.5; S: 0.6),Galaxias maculatus (F: 0.1),Heteroclinus adelaide (F:<0.1),Kestratherina esox (F: <0.1; S: 1.6),Leptatherina presbyteroides (F: <0.1; S: 7.1) andTetractenos glaber (F: 1). Commercial species, includingAldrichetta forsteri (F: <0.1; S: 3.2),Sillaginodes punctata (F: <0.1; S: 0.9), andRhombosolea tapirina (F: 0.4), were commonly sampled. Variability in species richness or fish abundance was not explained by water temperature, salinity, depth, or barometric pressure. Significantly more species were sampled with the seine during nocturnal periods (p=0.002); fish abundance did not vary between diel periods, nor did fish abundance and species richness in fyke net samples. Diets of the most abundant species (A. microstoma, A. forsteri, andF. lateralis) were primarily composed of gammaridean amphipods and hemipteran insects. There was no correlation between fish diets and the composition of benthic invertebrates as sampled at 3 different regions of the saltmarsh flat. The saltmarsh flats in our study region are inhabited by several species normally associated with alternative habitat types such as seagrass, and the patterns of habitat use observed appear to be partially attributed to foraging behavior.

Literature cited

  1. Adam, P.. 1990. Saltmarsh Ecology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K.Google Scholar
  2. Baltz, D., J. Fleeger, C. Rakocinski, andJ. McCall. 1998. Food, density, and microhabitat: Factors affecting growth and recruitment potential of juvenile saltmarsh fishes.Environmental Biology of Fishes 53:89–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baltz, D.M., C. Rakocinski, andJ.W. Fleeger. 1993. Microhabitat use by marsh-edge fishes in a Louisiana estuary.Environmental Biology of Fishes 36:109–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bell, J.D. andD.A. Pollard. 1989. Ecology of fish assemblages and fisheries associated with seagrasses, p. 565–609.In A.W.D. Larkum, A.J. McComb, and S. Shepherd (eds.), Biology of Seagrasses: A Treatise on the Biology of Seagrasses with Special Reference to the Australian Region. Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
  5. Black, K., D. Hatton, andM. Rosenberg. 1993. Locally and externally-driven dynamics of a large semi-enclosed bay in southern Australia.Journal of Coastal Research 9:509–538.Google Scholar
  6. Clarke, K.R. andR.M. Warwick. 2001. Changes in Marine Communities: An Approach to Statistical Analysis and Interpretation, 2nd edition. Primer-E, Plymouth, U.K.Google Scholar
  7. Connolly, R.M. 1994. A comparison of fish assemblages from seagrass and unvegetated areas of a southern Australian estuary.Australian Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research 45: 1033–1044.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Connolly, R.M., A. Dalton, andD.A. Bass. 1997. Fish use of an inundated saltmarsh flat in a temperate Australian estuary.Australian Journal of Ecology 22:222–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cyrus, D.P. andS.J.M. Blaber. 1992. Turbidity and salinity in a tropical northern Australian estuary and their influence on fish distribution.Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 35:545–563.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Edgar, G.J. andC. Shaw. 1995. The production and trophic ecology of shallow-water fish assemblages in southern Australia. II. Diets of fishes and trophic relationships between fishes and benthos at Western Port, Victoria.Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 194:83–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Edgar, G.J., C. Shaw, G.F. Watson, andL.S. Hammond. 1994. Comparisons of species richness, size-structure and production of benthos in vegetated and unvegetated habitats in Western Port, Victoria.Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 176:201–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Elmgren, R.. 1973. Methods of sampling sublittoral soft bottom meiofauna.Oikos 15:112–120.Google Scholar
  13. Environment 1990. Swan Bay Wildlife Reserve Proposed Management Plan. Department of Conservation and Environment, State of Victoria, Australia.Google Scholar
  14. Gomon, M.F., J.C.M. Glover, andR.H. Kuiter. 1994. The Fishes of Australia's South Coast. The Flora and Fauna of South Australia Handbooks Committee, Adelaide, Australia.Google Scholar
  15. Halpin, P.. 2000. Habitat use by an intertidal salt-marsh fish: Trade-offs between predation and growth.Marine Ecology Progress Seres 198:203–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hamer, P.A., andG.P. Jenkins. 1996. Larval supply and shortterm recruitment of a temperate zone demersal fish, the King George whiting,Sillaginodes punctata Cuvier and Valenciennes, to an embayment in south-eastern Australia.Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 208:197–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hampel, H., A. Cattrijsse, andM. Vincx. 2003. Tidal, diel and semi-lunar changes in the faunal assemblage of an intertidal saltmarsh creek.Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 56:795–805.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hindell, J.S., G.P. Jenkins, andM.J. Keough. 2000a. Evaluating the impact of predation by fish on the assemblage structure of fishes associated with seagrass (Heterozostera tasmanica) (martens ex Ascherson) den Hartog, and unvegetated sand habitats.Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 255: 153–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hindell, J.S., G.P. Jenkins, andM.J. Keough. 2000b. Variability in abundances of fishes associated with seagrass habitats in relation to diets of predatory fishes.Marine Biology 136: 725–737.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hindell, J., G. Jenkins, andM. Keough. 2002. Variability in the numbers of post-settlement King George whiting (Sillaginidae:Sillaginodes punctata, Cuvier) in relation to predation, habitat complexity and artificial cage structure.Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 268:13–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hindell, J. andG. Jenkins. 2004. Spatial and temporal variability in the assemblage structure of fishes associated with mangroves (Avicennia marina) and intertidal mudflats in temperate Australian embayments.Marine Biology 144:385–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hyslop, E.J.. 1980. Stomach contents analysis—A review of methods and their application.Journal of Fish Biology 17:411–429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Jenkins, G. andP. Hamer. 2001. Spatial variation in the use of seagrass and un-vegetated habitats by post-settlement King George whiting (Percoidei: Sillaginidae) in relation to meiofaunal distribution and macrophyte structure.Marine Ecology Progress Series 224:219–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Jenkins, G.P., H.M.A. May, M.J. Wheatley, andM.G. Holloway. 1997. Comparison of fish assemblages associated with seagrass and adjacent unvegetated habitats of Port Phillip Bay and Corner Inlet, Victoria, Australia, with emphasis on commercial species.Esturine, Coastal and Shelf Science 44:569–588.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Jenkins, G.P. andC.R. Sutherland. 1997. The influence of habitat structure on nearshore fish assemblages in a southern Australian embayment: Colonisation and turnover rate of fishes associated with artificial macrophyte beds of varying physical structure.Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 218:103–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Jenkins, C.P., D.C. Welsford, M.J. Keough, andP.A. Hamer. 1998. Diurnal and tidal vertical migration of pre-settlement King George whitingSillaginodes punctata in relation to feeding and vertical distribution of prey in a temperate bay.Marine Ecology Progress Series 170:239–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Jenkins, G.P., M.J. Wheatley, andA.G.B. Poore. 1996. Spatial variation in recruitment, growth and feeding of post-settlement King George whiting,Sillaginodes punctata, associated with seagrass beds of Port Phillip Bay, Australia.Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Science 53:350–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kneib, R.T.. 1987. Predation risk and use of intertidal habitats by young fishes and shrimp.Ecology 68:379–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Laegdsgaard, P. andC.R. Johnson. 1995. Mangrove habitats as nurseries: Unique assemblages of juvenile fish in subtropical mangroves in eastern Australia.Marine Ecology Progress Series 126:67–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lehmkuhl, D. M.. 1979. How to Know the Aquatic Insects. Wm. C. Brown Publishers, Dubuque, Iowa.Google Scholar
  31. Loneragan, N. R., S. E. Bunn, andD. M. Kellaway. 1997. Are mangroves and seagrasses sources of organic carbon for penaeid prawns in a tropical Australian estuary? A multiple stable-isotope study.Marine Biology 130:289–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Loneragan, N. R. andI. C. Potter. 1990. Factors influencing community structure and distribution of different life-cycle categories of fishes in shallow waters of a large Australian estuary.Marine Biology 106:25–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Long, S. P. andC. F. Mason. 1983. Saltmarsh Ecology. Blackie and Son, Limited, Glasgow, U.K.Google Scholar
  34. Minello, T. J., K. W. Able, M. P. Weinstein, andC. G. Hays. 2003. Salt marshes as nurseries for nekton: Testing hypotheses on density, growth and survival through meta-analysis.Marine Ecology Progress Series 246:39–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Morton, R. M., J. P. Beumer, andB. R. Pollock. 1988. Fishes of a subtropical Australian saltmarsh and their predation upon mosquitoes.Environmental Biology of Fishes 21:185–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Morton, R. M., B. R. Pollock, andJ. P. Beumer. 1987. The occurrence and diet of fishes in a tidal inlet to a saltmarsh in southern Moreton Bay, Queensland.Australian Journal of Ecology 12:217–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Peterson, B. J., K. R. Thompson, J. H. Cowan, andK. L. Heck, Jr. 2001. Comparison of predation pressure in temperate and subtropical seagrass habitats based on chronographic tethering.Marine Ecology Progress Series 224:77–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Peterson, G. W. andR. E. Turner. 1994. The value of salt marsh edge vs interior as a habitat for fish and decapod crustaceans in a Louisiana tidal marsh.Estuaries 17:235–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Poulin, R. andG. J. FitzGerald. 1989. Early life histories of three sympatric sticklebacks in a salt-marsh.Journal of Fish Biology 34:207–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Quinn, G. andM. Keough. 2002. Experimental Design and Data Analysis for Biologists. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K.Google Scholar
  41. Ranwell, D. S. 1972. Ecology of Salt Marshes and Sand Dunes. Chapman and Hall, Ltd., London, U.K.Google Scholar
  42. Rountree, R. A. andK. W. Able. 1993. Diel variation in decapod crustacean and fish assemblages in New Jersey polyhaline marsh creeks.Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 37:181–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Rozas, L. P. 1995. Hydroperiod and its influence on nekton use of the salt marsh: A pulsing ecosystem.Estuaries 18:579–590.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Rozas, L. P. andT. J. Minello. 1998. Nekton use of salt marsh, seagrass, and nonvegetated habitats in a south Texas (USA) estuary.Bulletin of Marine Science 63:481–501.Google Scholar
  45. Rozas, L. P., andR. J. Zimmerman. 2000. Small-scale patterns of nekton use among marsh and adjacent shallow nonvegetated areas of the Galveston Bay estuary, Texas (USA).Marine Ecology Progress Series 193:217–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Saintilan, N. andR. J. Williams. 1999. Mangrove transgression into saltmarsh environments in south-east Australia.Global Ecology and Biogeography 8:117–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Sumpton, W. andJ. Greenwood. 1990. Pre- and post-flood feeding ecology of four species of juvenile fish from the Logan-Albert estuarine system, Moreton Bay, Queensland.Australian Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research 41:795–806.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Thomas, B. E. andR. M. Connolly. 2001. Fish use of subtropical saltmarshes in Queensland, Australia: Relationships with vegetation, water depth and distance onto the marsh.Marine Ecology Progress Series 209:275–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Weisberg, S. B., andV. A. Lotrich. 1982. The importance of an infrequently flooded intertidal marsh surface as an energy source for the mummichogFundulus heteroclitus: An experimental approach.Marine Biology 66:307–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. West, J. andJ. Zedler. 2000. Marsh-creek connectivity: Fish use of a tidal marsh in southern California.Estuaries 23:699–710.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Yanez-Arancibia, A., A. L. Lara-Dominguez, andJ. W. Day, Jr. 1993. Interactions between mangrove and seagrass habitats mediated by estuarine nekton assemblages: Coupling of primary and secondary production.Hydrobiologia 264:1–12.Google Scholar
  52. Zimmerman, R. J., T. J. Minello, andG. Zamora. 1984. Selection of vegetated habitat by brown shrimp,Penaeus aztecus, in a Galveston Bay salt marsh.Fishery Bulletin 82:325–336.Google Scholar
  53. Baumgartner, L.. Unpublished data. School of Ecology and Environment, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia 3216.Google Scholar
  54. Jenkins, G.. Unpublished data. Department of Primary Industries, Queenscliff, Australia 3225Google Scholar
  55. Travers, M. Unpublished data. School of Ecology and Environment, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia 3216.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Estuarine Research Federation 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of ZoologyUniversity of MelbourneParkvilleAustralia
  2. 2.Department of Primary IndustriesQueenscliffAustralia

Personalised recommendations