Shock incarceration and its impact on the lives of problem drinkers

  • James W. Shaw
  • Doris Layton MacKenzie


Of shock incarceration on offenders identified as problem on a criminal history of alcohol-related crimes and self report of drinking ehavior, was examined. Problem drinkers and non-pronkers serving time in a shock incarceration program were compare similar offenders serving time in a regular prison environment. Attitude previously found to be associated with problem drinking were examined using a repeated measures design over a three month period. Problem drinkers in shock incarceration became less alienated and more prosocial in their attitudes compared to the problem drinkers in the prison inmates. Problem drinkers who graduated from shock incarceration were also found to adjust better on parole than offenders paroled from regular prison. Flowever, the behavior of problem drinkers as a group was more varied than that of non-problem drinkers, emphasizing the importance of and need for programs such as this to provide adequate support and after-care for problem drinkers and substance abusers.


  1. Amir, M. (1967). Alcohol and forcible rape.British Journal of Addiction, 62, 219–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barnes, G.E. (1979). The alcoholic personality: A reanalysis of the literature.Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 40, 571–634.Google Scholar
  3. Boyatzis, R.E. (1975). The predisposition toward alcohol-related interpersonal aggression in men.Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 36, 1196–1207.Google Scholar
  4. Bureau of Justice Statistics. (1983). Prisoners and Alcohol. Bulletin, January.Google Scholar
  5. Cahalan, D. (1982). Epidemiology: Alcohol use in American society. In L. Gomberg, H.R. White, & J.A. Carpenter (Eds.).Alcohol. Science and Society Revisited (pp. 96–118). Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
  6. sCahalan, D. (1970).Problem Drinkers. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Inc., Publishers.Google Scholar
  7. Catalan, D., & Cisin, I.H. (1976). Drinking behavior and drinking problems in the United States. In B. Kissin & H. Begleiter (Eds.).Social Aspects of Alcoholism:Vol 4 (pp. 77–115). New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
  8. Cahalan, D., & Room, R. (1974).Problem Drinking among American Men. New Haven, Conn.: College & University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Clark, W. (1966). Operational definitions of drinking problems and associated prevalence rates.Quarterly Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 22, 648–668.Google Scholar
  10. Clark, W., & Midanik, L. (1982).Alcohol Use and Alcohol Problems Among U.S. Adults: Results of the 1979 Survey. Alcohol Consumption and Related Problems (pp. 3–52). Alcohol and Health Monograph No. 1, DHHS Publication No. ADM 82-1190. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  11. Collins, J.J. (1986). The relationship of problem drinking to individual offending sequences. In A. Blumstein, J. Cohen, J.A. Roth, & C.A. Visher (Eds.).Criminal Careers and “Career Criminals” (pp. 89–120). Washington DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  12. Cook, T.D., & Campbell, D.T. (1979).Ouasi-Experimentation: Design & Analysis Issues for Field Settings. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company.Google Scholar
  13. Cox, W.M. (1987). Personality theory and research. In H.T. Blane & K.E. Leonard (Eds.).Psychological Theories of Drinking and Alcoholism (pp. 55–89). New York: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  14. Dunham, R.G., & Mauss, A.L. (1982). Reluctant referrals: The effectiveness of legal coercion in outpatient treatment for problem drinkers.Journal of Drug Issues, 12, 5–20.Google Scholar
  15. Fagan, R. W., & Fagan, N.M. (1982). The impact of legal coercion on the treatment of alcoholism.Journal of Drug Issues, 12, 103–114.Google Scholar
  16. Gallant, D.M., Bishop, M.P., Faulkner, M.U., Simpson, L., Cooper, A., & Lathrop, D. (1968). A comparative evaluation of compulsory (group therapy and/or antabuse) and voluntary treatment of the chronic alcoholic municipal court offender.Psychosomatics, 9, 306–310.Google Scholar
  17. Gendreau, P., & Ross, R. (1987). Revivification of rehabilitation: Evidence from the 1980’s.Justice Quarterly, 4, 349–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Goldman, M.S., Brown, S.A., & Christiansen, B.A. (1987). Expectancy theory: Thinking about drinking. In H.T. Blane & K.E. Leonard (Eds.).Psychological Theories of Drinking and Alcoholism (pp. 181–226). New York: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  19. Goodstein, L.I. & Wright, K. (1989). Inmate adjustment to prison. In L.I. Goodstein & D.L. MacKenzie (Eds.),The American Prison: Issues in Research and Policy. New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
  20. Hoffman, H., Loper, R.G. & Kammeier, M.L. (1974). Identifying future alcoholics with MMPI alcoholic scales.Quarterly Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 35, 490–498.Google Scholar
  21. Jesness, C.F. (1983).The Jesness Inventory. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.Google Scholar
  22. Keller, M. (1982a). On defining alcoholism: With comment on some other relevant words. In L. Gomberg, H.R. White, & J.A. Carpenter (Eds.).Alcohol, Science and Society Revisited (pp. 119–133). Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
  23. Keller, M. (1982b). Alcohol, science and society: Hindsight and forecast. In L. Gomberg, H.R. White, & J.A. Carpenter (Eds.).Alcohol, Science and Society Revisited (pp. 1–16). Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
  24. Knupfer, G. (1967). The epidemiology of problem drinking.American Journal of Public Health, 57, 973–986.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lang, A.R., Goeckner, D.J., Adesso, V.J., & Marlatt, G.A. (1975). Effects of alcohol on aggression in male social drinkers.Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 84, 508–518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Latessa, E.J. & Vito, G.F. (1988). The effects of intensive supervision on shock probationers.Journal of Criminal Justice, 16, 319–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Louisiana Department of Public Safety and Corrections. (1987). IMPACT: Purposes, Policies and Procedures. Unpublished manuscript. Baton Rouge, LA.Google Scholar
  28. MacAndrew, C., & Edgerton, R.B. (1969).Drunken Comportment. Chicago: Aldine Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  29. MacAndrew, C. & Geertsma, R.H. (1963). An analysis of responses of alcoholics to scale 4 of the MMPI.Quarterly Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 24, 23–38.Google Scholar
  30. MacKenzie, D.L., & Ballow, D. (1989). Shock incarceration programs in state correctional jurisdictions—An update. NU Reports. No. 214, 9–10.Google Scholar
  31. MacKenzie, D.L., Gould, L.A., Riechers, L.M., & Shaw, J.W. (1989). Shock incarceration in Louisiana: Retribution or rehabilitation?Journal of Offender Counseling, Services and Rehabilitation, 14, 25–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. MacKenzie, D.L., & Shaw, J.W. (1990). Inmate adjustment and change during shock incarceration: The impact of correctional boot camp programs.Justice Quarterly, 7, 125–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Manson, M.P. (1949). A psychometric analysis of psychopathic characteristics of alcoholics.Journal of Consulting Psychology, 13, 111–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. McClelland, D.C., Davis, W.N., Kalin, R., & Wanner, E. (1972).The Drinking Man: A Theory of Human Motivation. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  35. McCord, J. (1981). Alcoholism and criminality: Confounding and differentiating factors.Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 42. 739–748.Google Scholar
  36. McCord, W., & McCord, J. (1962). A longitudinal study of the personality of alcoholics. In D.J. Pittman & C.R. Snyder (Eds.).Society. Culture, and Crime Patterns (pp. 413–430). New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.Google Scholar
  37. Miller, B.A., & Welte, J.W. (1986). Comparisons of incarcerated offenders according to use of alcohol and/or drugs prior to offense.Criminal Justice and Behavior, 13, 366–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Paredes, A., Hood, W.R., Seymour, H., & Gollob, M. (1977). In E.M. Pattison, M.B. Sobell, & L.C. Sobell (Eds.).Emerging Concepts of Alcohol Dependence (pp. 96–119). New York: Springer Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  39. Parent, D. (1989). Shock Incarceration: An Overview of Existing Programs. National Institute of Justice Report.Google Scholar
  40. Parent, D. (1988). Shock Incarceration and the Attainment of Sentencing and Corrections Goals. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Society of Criminology, Chicago, IL.Google Scholar
  41. Peterson, M.A., & Braiker. (1980). Doing Crime: A Survey of California Prison Inmates (with S.M. Polich). Santa Monica, CA: Rand Corporation Report.Google Scholar
  42. Pihl, R.O. (1983). Alcohol and aggression: A psychological perspective. In E. Gottheil, K.A. Druley, T.E. Skoloda, & H.M. Waxman (Eds.),Alcohol, Drug Abuse and Aggression (pp. 292–313). Springfield, Illinois: Thomas.Google Scholar
  43. Plaut, T.F. (1967).Alcohol Problems: A Report to the Nation by the Cooperative Commission on the Study of Alcoholism. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  44. Polich, J.M. (1979). Alcohol problems among civilian youth and military personnel. In H.T. Blane & M.E. Chafetz (Eds.).Youth, Alcohol, and Social Policy (pp. 59–86). New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
  45. Room, R. (1977). The measurement and distribution of drinking patterns and problems in general populations. In G. Edwards, M.M. Gross, M. Keller, J. Moser, & R. Room (Eds.).Alcohol-Related Disabilities (pp. 61–87). Geneva: World Health Organization.Google Scholar
  46. Voss, H.L., & J.R. Hepburn. (1968). Patterns in criminal homicide in Chicago.Journal of Criminal law, Criminology, and Police Science, 59, 499–508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Wolfgang, M.E. (1958).Patterns in Criminal Homicide. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
  48. Young, T.J., & Lawson, G.W. (1984). A.A. referrals for alcohol related crimes: The advantages and limitations.International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 28, 131–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Zuckerman, M., Sola, S., Masterson, J., & Angelone, J.V. (1975). MMPI patterns in drug abusera before and after treatment in therapeutic communities.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 43, 286–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • James W. Shaw
    • 1
  • Doris Layton MacKenzie
    • 1
  1. 1.University of MarylandUSA

Personalised recommendations