Advertisement

Work environment and hand dermatitis among nurses in a Chinese teaching hospital

  • Derek R. Smith
  • Ning Wei
  • Lin Kang
  • Rui-Sheng Wang
Short Communication

Abstract

Objective

The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of the working environment on hand dermatitis (HD) prevalence among nurses in a Chinese teaching hospital.

Methods

We utilised a previously validated, self-reporting survey which was translated into Chinese.

Results

The prevalence of HD among nurses was 18.3%, although this rate varied between departments, ranging from 9.4% in gynaecology to 26.7% in intensive care (P for Trend=0.3167). Logistic regression indicated that wet work was the most important HD risk factor, with a 9-fold increase (OR 9.0, 95% CI 1.2–74.9, P=0.0342). Allergic disease was also related to HD, with a 4.6-fold increase noted (OR 4.6, 95% CI 1.4–15.0, P=0.0096).

Conclusions

Overall, the prevalence of HD among Chinese hospital nurses appears to be less than that of their foreign counterparts. Nevertheless, the burden of this disease does seem to vary with respect to depertment of employment within the hospital.

Key words

work environment hand dermatitis China nurse wet work 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. (1).
    Meding B, Swanbeck G. Predictive factors for hand cezema. Contact Dermatitis. 1990; 23: 154–161.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. (2).
    Stingeni L, Lapomarda V, Lisi P. Occupational hand dermatilis in hospital environment. Contact Dermatitis. 1995; 33: 172–176.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. (3).
    Smith DR, Ohmura K, Yamagata Z. Prevalence and correlates of hand dermatitis among nurses in a Japanese teaching hospital. J. Epidemiol 2003; 13: 157–161.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. (4).
    Soter K, Salomon J, Horanin M, Nowicka D, Szepietowski JC. Atopy as the main predisposing factor to hand dermatitis in hospital staff: A preliminary self-assessment questionnaire study. Environ. Dermatol. 2001; 8: 163–166.Google Scholar
  5. (5).
    Forrester BG, Roth VS. Hand dermatitis in intensive care units. J. Occup. Environ. Med. 1998; 40: 881–885.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. (6).
    Larson E, Friedman C, Cohran J, Treston-Aurand J, Green S. Prevalence and correlates of skin damage on the hands of nurses. Heart Lung 1997; 26: 404–412.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. (7).
    Smit HA, Coenraads PJ. A retrospective cohort study on the incidence of hadn dermatitis in nurses. Int. Arch. Occup. Environ. Health 1993; 64: 541–544.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. (8).
    Lantinga H, Nater JP, Coenraads PJ. Prevalence, incidence and course of eczema on the hands and forearms in a sample of the general population. Contact Dermatitis 1984; 10: 135–139.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. (9).
    Smit HA, Burdorf A, Coenraads PJ. Prevalence of hand dermatitis in different occupations. Int. J. Epidemiol. 1993; 22: 288–293.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. (10).
    Meding B, Swanbeck G. Occupational hand eczema in an industrial city. Contact Dermatitis 1990; 22: 13–23.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. (11).
    Xu Y, Xu Z, Zhang J. The nursing education system in the People's Republic of China: Evolution, structure and reform. Int. Nurs. Rev. 2000; 47: 207–217.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. (12).
    Smith HA, Coenraads PJ, Lavrijsen APM, Nater JP. Evaluation of a self-administered questionnaire on hand dermatitis. Contact Dermatitis 1992; 26: 11–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. (13).
    Berg M. Evaluation of a questionnaire used in dermatological epidemiology. Discrepancy between self-reported symptoms and objective signs. Acta Dermato. Venereol. (Stockh.) 1991; Suppl. 156: 13–17.Google Scholar
  14. (14).
    Simion FA, Rhein LD, Morrison BM, Scala DD, Salko DM, Kligman AM, Grove GL. Self-perceived sensory responses to soap and synthetic detergent bars, correlate with clinical signs of irritation. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 1995; 32: 205–211.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. (15).
    Smith DR, Symth W, Leggat PA, Wang RS. Hand dermatitis among Australian nurses working in a tropical environment. Aust. J. Adv, Nurs. 2004 (in press).Google Scholar
  16. (16).
    Nilsson E, Bäck O. The importance of anamnestic information of atopy, metal dermatitis and earlier hand eczema for the development of hand dermatitis in women in wet hospital work. Acta Dermato. Venereol. (Stockh). 1986; 66: 45–50.Google Scholar
  17. (17).
    Tsai TF, Maibach HI. How irritant is water? An overview. Contact Dermatitis 1999; 41: 311–314.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. (18).
    Meding B, Swanbeck G. Consequences of having hand eczema. Contact Dermatitis 1990; 23: 6–14.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Japanese Society of Hygiene 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Derek R. Smith
    • 1
  • Ning Wei
    • 2
    • 3
  • Lin Kang
    • 3
  • Rui-Sheng Wang
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Hazard AssessmentNational Institute of Industrial HealthKawasakJapan
  2. 2.Department of Medical Psychology, Third Teaching HospitalHebei Medical UniversityShijiazhuangChina
  3. 3.Fourth Teaching HospitalHebei Medical UniversityShijiazhuangChina

Personalised recommendations