Countries and their products: A cognitive structure perspective

  • Terence A. Shimp
  • Saeed Samiee
  • Thomas J. Madden
Article

Abstract

This research reports on consumers’ cognitive structures for countries and their products. In-depth personal interviews identified respondents’ knowledge, beliefs, myths, and other relevant cognitions related to a diverse set of 11 countries and their products. Derived cognitive dimensions were analyzed via correspondence analysis, and the 11 countries were subsequently grouped into five sets, or cognitive categories. In addition to the empirical findings, the article introduces the concept of country equity as a new way of thinking about global brands and discusses managerial implications related thereto.

Keywords

Correspondence Analysis Consumer Research Cognitive Structure Brand Equity International Business Study 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Aaker, David A. and Kevin Lane Keller. 1990. “Consumer Evaluations of Brand Extensions.”Journal of Marketing 54 (January): 27–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bannister, J.P. and J.A. Saunders. 1978. “UK Consumers’ Attitudes Towards Imports: The Measurement of National Stereotype Image.”European Journal of Marketing 12 (8): 562–570.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Berger, Ida E. and Andrew A. Mitchell. 1989. “The Effect of Advertising on Attitude Accessibility, Attitude Confidence, and the Attitude-Behavior Relationship.”Journal of Consumer Research 16 (December): 269–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bilkey, Warren J. and Erik Nes. 1982. “Country of Origin Effects on Product Evaluations.”Journal of International Business Studies 8 (Spring/Summer): 89–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Carroll, J. Douglas, Paul E. Green, and Catherine M. Schaffer. 1986. “Interpoint Distance Comparisons in Correspondence Analysis.”Journal of Marketing Research 23 (August): 271–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cattin, Phillipe, Alain Jolibert, and Colleen Lohnes. 1982. “A Cross-Cultural Study of ‘Made In’ Concepts.”Journal of International Business Studies 13 (Winter): 131–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cohen, Joel B. 1982. “The Role of Affect in Categorization: Towards a Reconsideration of the Concept of Attitude.” InAdvances in Consumer Research. Vol. 9. Ed. Andrew A. Mitchell. Ann Arbor, MI: Association for Consumer Research, 94–100.Google Scholar
  8. Erickson, Gary M., Johny K. Johansson, and Paul Chao. 1984. “Image Variables in Multi-Attribute Product Evaluations: Country of Origin Effects.”Journal of Consumer Research 11 (September): 694–699.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fazio, Russell H., Martha C. Powell, and Carol J. Williams. 1989. “The Role of Attitude Accessibility in the Attitude-to-Behavior Process.”Journal of Consumer Research 16 (December): 280–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Folkes, Valerie S. 1988. “Recent Attribution Research in Consumer Behavior: A Review and New Directions.”Journal of Consumer Research 14 (March): 548–565.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gaedeke, Ralph. 1973. “Consumer Attitudes Toward Products ‘Made In’ Developing Countries.”Journal of Retailing 49 (Summer): 13–24.Google Scholar
  12. Hallen, Lars and Jan Johanson. 1985. “Industrial Marketing Strategies and Different National Environments.”Journal of Business Research 13 (November): 495–509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Han, C. Min. 1989. “Country Image: Halo or Summary Construct?”Journal of Marketing Research 26 (May): 222–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Han, C. Min and William J. Qualls. 1982. “Country-of-Origin Effects and Their Impact upon Consumers’ Perceptions of Quality”. InAdvances in Consumer Research. Vol 9. Ed. Andrew A. Mitchell. Ann Arbor, MI: Association for Consumer Research, 162–167.Google Scholar
  15. Han, C. Min and Vern Terpstra. 1988. “Country-of-Origin Effects for Uni-National and Bi-National Products.”Journal of International Business Studies 19 (Summer): 235–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hoffman, Donna L. and George R. Franke. 1986. “Correspondence Analysis: Graphical Representation of Categorical Data in Marketing Research.”Journal of Marketing Research 23 (August): 213–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hong, Sung-Tai and Robert S. Wyer, Jr. 1989. “Effects of Country of Origin and Product-Attribute Information on Product Evaluation: An Information Processing Perspective.”Journal of Consumer Research 16 (September): 175–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Howard, Donald G. 1990. “Understanding How American Consumers Formulate Their Attitudes about Foreign Products.”Journal of Global Marketing 2 (2): 7–24.Google Scholar
  19. Hunt, Shelby D. 1991.Modern Marketing Theory: Critical Issues in the Philosophy of Marketing Science. Cincinnati: South-Western.Google Scholar
  20. Johansson, Johny K., Susan P. Douglas, and Ikujiro Nonaka. 1985. “Assessing the Impact of Country of Origin on Product Evaluations: A New Methodological Perspective.”Journal of Marketing Research 22 (November): 388–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Johansson, Johny K. and Israel D. Nebenzahl. 1986. “Multinational Production: Effect on Brand Value.”Journal of International Business Studies 17 (Fall): 101–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kanwar, Rajesh, Jerry C. Olson, and Laura S. Sims. 1981. “Toward Conceptualizing and Measuring Cognitive Structures.” InAdvances in Consumer Research. Vol. 8. Ed. Kent B. Monroe. Ann Arbor: Association for Consumer Research, 122–127.Google Scholar
  23. Kaynak, Erdener and S. Tamer Cavusgil. 1983. “Consumer Attitudes towards Products of Foreign Origin: Do They Vary Across Product Classes?”International Journal of Advertising 2 (April–June): 147–157.Google Scholar
  24. Kelley, Harold H. 1967. “Attribution Theory in Social Psychology.” InNebraska Symposium on Motivation. Ed. David Levine. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press, 192–238.Google Scholar
  25. Khanna, Sri Ram. 1986. “Asian Companies and the Country Stereotyping Paradox: An Empirical Study.”Columbia Journal of World Business 11 (Summer): 29–38.Google Scholar
  26. Lebart, Ludovic and Alain Morineau. 1982. “SPAD: A System of FORTRAN Programs for Correspondence Analysis.”Journal of Marketing Research 19 (November): 608–609.Google Scholar
  27. Lumpkin, James R. and John C. Crawford. 1985. “Consumer Perceptions of Developing Countries.” InDevelopments in Marketing Science. Vol. 8. Ed. Naresh Malhotra. Coral Gables, FL: Academy of Marketing Science, 95–97.Google Scholar
  28. McCracken, Grant. 1988.The Long Interview: A Four-Step Method of Qualitative Inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  29. Mervis, Carolyn B. and Eleanor Rosch. 1981. “Categorization of Natural Objects.”Annual Review of Psychology 32: 89–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Ofir, Chezy and Donald R. Lehmann. 1986. “Measuring Images of Foreign Products.”Columbia Journal of World Business 11 (Summer): 105–108.Google Scholar
  31. Özsomer, Aysegul and S. Tamer Cavusgil. 1991. “Country-of-Origin Effects on Product Evaluations: A Sequel to Bilkey and Nes Review.” InEnhancing Knowledge Development in Marketing. Eds. Mary C. Gilly et al. Chicago: American Marketing Association, 269–277.Google Scholar
  32. Papadopoulos, Nicolas G., Louise A. Heslop, Francoise Graby, and George Avlonitis. 1987. “Does ‘Country of Origin’ Matter? Some Findings from a Cross-Cultural Study of Consumer Views about Foreign Products.”Marketing Science Institute (October). Report No. 87–104.Google Scholar
  33. Perreault, William D., Jr. and Laurence E. Leigh. 1989. “Reliability of Nominal Data Based on Qualitative Judgments.”Journal of Marketing Research 26 (May): 135–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Rosch, Eleanor and Carolyn B. Mervis. 1975. “Family Resemblance: Studies in the Internal Structure of Categories.”Cognitive Psychology 7 (October): 573–605.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Schooler, Robert D. 1971. “Bias Phenomena Attendant to the Marketing of Foreign Goods in the U.S.”Journal of International Business Studies 2 (Spring): 71–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Shimp, Terence A. and Subhash Sharma. 1987. “Consumer Ethnocentrism: Construction and Validation of the CETSCALE.”Journal of Marketing Research 24 (August): 280–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Sujan, Mita. 1985. “Consumer Knowledge: Effects on Evaluation Strategies Mediating Consumer Judgments.”Journal of Consumer Research 12 (June): 31–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Wall, Marjorie and Louise A. Heslop. 1986. “Consumer Attitudes Toward Canadian Made-In Versus Imported Products.”Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 14 (Summer): 27–36.Google Scholar
  39. Wang, Chih-Kang. 1978. “The Effect of Foreign Economic, Political and Cultural Environment on Consumers’ Willingness to Buy Foreign Products.” Ph.D. dissertation. Texas A & M University.Google Scholar
  40. Wang, Chih-Kang and Charles W. Lamb, Jr. 1980. “Foreign Environmental Factors Influencing American Consumers’ Predisposition Toward European Products.”Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 8 (Fall): 345–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Wang, Chih-Kang and Charles W. Lamb, Jr. 1983. “The Impact of Selected Environmental Forces upon Consumers’ Willingness to Buy Foreign Products.”Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 11 (Spring): 71–86.Google Scholar
  42. White, Phillip D. and Edward W. Cundiff. 1978. “Assessing the Quality of Industrial Products.”Journal of Marketing 42 (January): 80–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Academy of Marketing Science 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • Terence A. Shimp
    • 1
  • Saeed Samiee
    • 2
  • Thomas J. Madden
    • 3
  1. 1.the University of South CarolinaUSA
  2. 2.the International Management Center at the University of TulsaUSA
  3. 3.the University of South CarolinaUSA

Personalised recommendations