Developing a customer value-based theory of the firm

  • Stanley F. Slater
Marketing In the 21st Century Commentary

Conclusion

Just as it was inappropriate to characterize this as the development of a new theory of the firm, it also is premature to suggest that this commentary articulates a comprehensive customer value-based theory of the firm. The foundation for this theory was laid decades ago, and the ideas presented in this commentary must be more thoroughly developed before it can appropriately deemed a “theory of the firm.” However, as marketers, we should be committed to the proposition that the creation of customer value must be the reason for the firm’s existence and certainly for its success. Thus developing this theory further and testing the propositions that comprise it should be a high priority for marketing scholars.

References

  1. Achrol, Ravi S. 1991. “Evolution of the Marketing Organization: New Forms for Turbulent Environments.”Journal of Marketing 55 (October): 77–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alderson, Wroe. 1957.Marketing Behavior and Executive Action. Homewood, IL: Irwin.Google Scholar
  3. Anderson, Paul F. 1982. “Marketing, Strategic Planning and the Theory of the Firm.”Journal of Marketing 46 (Spring): 15–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Andrews, K. R. 1971.The Concept of Corporate Strategy. Homewood, IL: Dow Jones Irwin.Google Scholar
  5. Barnard, Chester. 1938.The Functions of the Executive. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Barney, Jay. 1991. “Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage.”Journal of Management 17 (1): 99–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Coase, Ronald. 1937. “The Nature of the Firm.”Economica 4: 386–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Collins, James C. and Jerry I. Porras. 1994.Built to Last. New York: HarperBusiness.Google Scholar
  9. Conner, Kathleen R. 1991. “A Historical Comparison of Resource-Based Theory and Five Schools of Thought Within Industrial Organization Economics: Do We Have a New Theory of the Firm?”Journal of Management 17 (1): 121–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cravens, David W. and Shannon H. Shipp. 1991. “Market-Driven Strategies for Competitive Advantage.”Business Horizons (January–February): 53–61.Google Scholar
  11. Cyert, Richard M. and James G. March. 1963.A Behavioral Theory of the Firm. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  12. D’Aveni, R. A. 1994.Hypercompetition: Managing the Dynamics of Strategic Maneuvering. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  13. Day, George S. 1992. “Marketing’s Contribution to the Strategy Dialogue.”Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 20 (Fall): 323–329.Google Scholar
  14. -----. 1994a. “The Capabilities of Market-Driven Organizations.”Journal of Marketing (October): 37–52.Google Scholar
  15. -----. 1994b. “Continuous Learning About Markets.”California Management Review (Summer): 9–31.Google Scholar
  16. ----- and Robin Wensley. 1988. “Assessing Advantage: A Framework for Diagnosing Competitive Superiority.”Journal of Marketing (April): 1–20.Google Scholar
  17. de Geus, Arie. 1988. “Planning as Learning.”Harvard Business Review 66 (March–April): 70–74.Google Scholar
  18. Deshpande, Rohit, John U. Farley, and Frederick E. Webster, Jr. 1993. “Corporate Culture, Customer Orientation, and Innovativeness in Japanese Firms: A Quadrad Analysis.”Journal of Marketing 57 (January): 23–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Dickson, Peter Reid. 1992. “Toward a General Theory of Competitive Rationality.”Journal of Marketing 56 (January): 69–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Drucker, Peter F. 1973.Management. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  21. Garvin, David A. 1993. “Building a Learning Organization.”Harvard Business Review (July–August): 78–91.Google Scholar
  22. Ghemawat, P. 1986. “Sustainable Advantage.”Harvard Business Review 64 (September–October): 53–58.Google Scholar
  23. Glazer, Rashi. 1991. “Marketing in an Information-Intensive Environment: Strategic Implications of Knowledge as an Asset.”Journal of Marketing 55 (October): 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hamel, Gary and C. K. Prahalad. 1991. “Corporate Imagination and Expeditionary Marketing.”Harvard Business Review (July–August): 81–92.Google Scholar
  25. Hammer, Michael. 1996.Beyond Reengineering. New York: Harper-Business.Google Scholar
  26. Holmstrom, B. R. and J. Tirole. 1989. “The Theory of the Firm.” InHandbook of Industrial Organization. Eds. R. Schmalensee and R. Willig. Amsterdam: North Holland, 61–133.Google Scholar
  27. Hunt, Shelby D. and Robert M. Morgan. 1995. “The Comparative Advantage Theory of Competition.”Journal of Marketing 59 (April): 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Jacobson, Robert. 1992. “The ‘Austrian’ School of Strategy.”Academy of Management Review 17 (4): 782–807.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Jaworski, Bernard J. and Ajay K. Kohli. 1993. “Market Orientation: Antecedents and Consequences.”Journal of Marketing 57 (July): 53–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Jensen, Michael and William Meckling. 1976. “Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure.”Journal of Financial Economics 3 (October): 305–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kerin, Roger A. 1992. “Marketing’s Contribution to the Strategy Dialogue Revisited.”Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 20 (Fall): 331–334.Google Scholar
  32. Kohli, Ajay K. and Bernard J. Jaworski. 1990. “Market Orientation: The Construct, Research Propositions, and Managerial Implications.”Journal of Marketing 54 (April): 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lynn, Gary, Joseph Morone, and Albert Paulson. 1996. “Marketing and Discontinuous Innovation: The Probe and Learn Process.”California Management Review 38 (3): 8–37.Google Scholar
  34. MacLachlan, Alexander. 1995. “Trusting Outsiders to Do Your Research: How Does Industry Learn to Do It?”Research Technology Management 38 (6): 48–53.Google Scholar
  35. March, James and Herbert Simon. 1958.Organizations. New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar
  36. Narver, John C. and Stanley F. Slater. 1990. “The Effect of a Market Orientation on Business Profitability.”Journal of Marketing (October): 20–35.Google Scholar
  37. Pelham, Alfred and David Wilson. 1995. “A Longitudinal Study of the Impact of Market Structure, Strategy, and Market Orientation Culture on Dimensions of Small Firm Performance.”Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 24 (1): 27–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Penrose, E. T. 1959.The Theory of the Growth of the Firm. New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar
  39. Pfeffer, J. and J. Salancik. 1978.The External Control of Organizations. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  40. Porter, M. E. 1980.Competitive Strategy. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  41. Quinn, James B. 1985. “Managing Innovation: Controlled Chaos.”Harvard Business Review (May–June): 73–84.Google Scholar
  42. —————. 1992.Intelligent Enterprise. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  43. Robins, James A. 1987. “Organizational Economics: Notes on the Use of Transaction-Cost Theory in the Study of Organizations.”Administrative Science Quarterly 32: 68–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Schumpeter, J. A. 1934.The Theory of Economic Development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
  45. Selznick, P. 1957.Leadership in Administration. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  46. Seth, Anju and Howard Thomas. 1994. “Theories of the Firm: Implications for Strategy Research.”Journal of Management Studies 31 (March): 165–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Simon, H. 1957.Administrative Behavior. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  48. Sinkula, James M. 1994. “Market Information Processing and Organizational Learning.”Journal of Marketing 58 (January): 35–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Slater, Stanley F. 1995. “Issues in Conducting Marketing Strategy Research.”Journal of Strategic Marketing 3 (4): 257–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. ————— 1996. “The Challenge of Sustaining Competitive Advantage.”Industrial Marketing Management 25: 79–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. ————— and John Narver. 1993. “Product-Market Strategy and Performance: An Analysis of the Miles and Snow Strategy Types.”European Journal of Marketing 27 (10): 33–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. ————— and —————. 1994. “Does Competitive Environment Moderate the Market Orientation Performance Relationship?”Journal of Marketing 58 (January): 46–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. ————— and —————. 1995. “Market Orientation and the Learning Organization.”Journal of Marketing 59 (July): 63–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. ————— and —————. 1996a. “Competitive Strategy in the Market-Focused Business.”Journal of Market Focused Management 1 (20): 159–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. ----- and -----. 1996b. “Information Search Style and Business Performance: An Exploratory Study.”University of Washington Working Paper.Google Scholar
  56. Stata, Ray. 1989. “Organizational Learning—The Key to Management Innovation.”Sloan Management Review (Spring): 63–74.Google Scholar
  57. Teece, David J. 1984. “Economic Analysis and Strategic Management.”California Management Review 26 (3): 87–110.Google Scholar
  58. Varadarajan, P. Rajan. 1992. “Marketing’s Contribution to the Strategy Dialogue: The View From a Different Looking Glass.”Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 20 (Fall): 335–344.Google Scholar
  59. Von Hippel, E. 1986. “Lead Users: A Source of Novel Product Concepts.”Management Science 32 (July): 791–805.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Webster, Frederick E., Jr. 1992. “The Changing Role of Marketing in the Corporation.”Journal of Marketing 56 (October): 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Wernerfelt, Birger. 1984. “A Resource-Based View of the Firm.”Strategic Management Journal 5: 171–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Williamson, Oliver E. 1975.Markets and Hierarchies. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Academy of Marketing Science 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  • Stanley F. Slater
    • 1
  1. 1.the University of WashingtonBothell

Personalised recommendations