American Journal of Criminal Justice

, Volume 24, Issue 2, pp 155–167 | Cite as

The efficacy of home security measures

Article

Abstract

Crime prevention through environmental design(CPTED) assumes criminal acts are influenced by their inherent costs and benefits. Policy implications drawn from CPTED suggest home security measures increase these costs and reduce the likelihood of burglary. This paper tests the efficacy of home security measures. A telephone survey of 566 residents in Mobile County, Alabama, inquired about security measures burglary victims and nonvictims employed. A logistic regression solution found some, but not all, of these security measures to be quite effective.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Allat, P. (1984). Residential burglary: Containment and displacement of burglary.Howard Journal of Criminal Justice, 23, 99–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bennett, T., & Wright, R. (1984).Burglars on burglary: Prevention and the offender. Brookfield, VT: Gower Publishing Co.Google Scholar
  3. Buck, A., Hakim, S., & Rengert, G. (1993). Burglar alarms and the choice behavior of burglars: A suburban phenomenon.Journal of Criminal Justice, 21, 497–507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bureau of Justice Statistics. (1996).Criminal victimization 1994: National crime victimization survey. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.Google Scholar
  5. Clarke, R. (1995). Situational crime prevention.British Journal of Criminology, 20, 136–147.Google Scholar
  6. Cohen, L., & Felson, M. (1979). Social change and crime rate trends: A routine activity approach.American Sociological Review, 44, 588–605.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cromwell, P., Olson, J., & Avary, D. (1991).Breaking and entering: An ethnographic analysis of burglary. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  8. Feins, J., Epstein, J., & Widom, R. (1997).Solving crime problems in residential neighborhoods: Comprehensive changes in design, management, and use. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.Google Scholar
  9. Forrester, D., Chatterton, M., & Pease, K. (1988).The Kirkholt burglary prevention demonstration project, Rochdale. Crime prevention unit paper 13. London: Home Office.Google Scholar
  10. Heller, N., Stenzel, W., Gill, A., Kolde, R., & Schimerman, S. (1975).Operation identification projects: Assessment of effectiveness. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.Google Scholar
  11. Jeffrey, C. R. (1971).Crime prevention through environmental design. Beverly Hills: Sage.Google Scholar
  12. Kaplan, H., O’Kane, K., Lavrakas, P., & Pesce, E. (1978).Crime prevention through environmental design: Final research report on commercial demonstration; Portland, Oregon. Arlington, VA: Westinghouse Electric Co.Google Scholar
  13. Laycock, G. (1985).Property marking: A deterrent to domestic burglary? Crime prevention unit paper 3. London: Home Office.Google Scholar
  14. Lilly, R., Cullen, F., & Ball, R. (1995).Criminological theory: Context and consequences (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  15. Miethe, T., & McCorkle, R. (1998).Crime profiles. Los Angeles: Roxbury.Google Scholar
  16. Meredith, C., & Paquette, C. (1992). Crime prevention in high-rise rental apartments: Findings of a demonstration project.Security Journal, 3, 161–169.Google Scholar
  17. Nasar, J., & Fisher, B. (1993). Hot spots of fear and crime: A multi-method investigation.Journal of Environmental Psychology, 13, 187–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Rengert, G., & Wasilchick, J. (1990).Space, time, and crime: Ethnographic insights into residential burglary. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.Google Scholar
  19. Reppeto, T. (1974).Residential crime. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger Publishing Co.Google Scholar
  20. Robinson, M. (1999). The theoretical development of crime prevention through environmental design(CPTED).Advances in Criminological Theory, 8, 427–462.Google Scholar
  21. Rosenbaum, D., Lewis, D., & Grant, J. (1986). Neighborhood-based crime prevention: Assessing the efficacy of community organizing in Chicago. In D. Rosenbaum (Ed.),Community crime prevention: Does it work? (pp. 68–86). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  22. Scarr, H., Pinsky, J., & Wyatt, D. (1973).Patterns of burglary. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.Google Scholar
  23. Seattle Law and Justice Planning Office. (1975).Evaluation report: Target hardening. Washington, DC: Law Enforcement Assistance Administration.Google Scholar
  24. Sherman, L., Gottfredson, D., MacKenzie, D., Eck, J., Reuter, P., & Bushway, S. (1998).Research in brief: Preventing crime: What works, what doesn’t, what’s promising. Washington, DC: United States Department of Justice.Google Scholar
  25. Shover, N. (1973). The social organization of burglary.Social Problems, 20, 54–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Shover, N., & Honaker, D. (1996). The socially bounded decision making of persistent property offenders. In P. Cromwell (Ed.),In their own words: Criminals on crime (pp. 10–23). Los Angeles: Roxbury Publishing Co.Google Scholar
  27. Spelman, W., & Eck, J. (1989). Sitting ducks, ravenous wolves, and helping hands: New approaches to urban policing.Public Affairs Comment, 35, 2, 1–9.Google Scholar
  28. Tilly, N., & Webb, J. (1994).Burglary reduction: Findings from safer cities schemes. Crime prevention unit paper 51. London: Home Office.Google Scholar
  29. Waller, I., & Okihiro, N. (1978).Burglary: The victim and the public. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
  30. Weisburd, D. (1997). Reorienting crime prevention research and policy: From the causes of criminality to the context of crime. Paper presented at the 1996 National Institute of Justice sponsored conference on criminal justice research and evaluation, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  31. Wright, R., & Decker, S. (1994).Burglars on the job. Boston: Northeastern University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Southern Criminal Justice Association 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Political Science and Criminal JusticeUniversity of South AlabamaMobile

Personalised recommendations