American Journal of Criminal Justice

, Volume 18, Issue 2, pp 307–326 | Cite as

Publicsector worker safety and legal remedies

  • Frances P. Bernat
Article
  • 20 Downloads

Abstract

While much is known about the affirmative responsibilities private employers must undertake in order to protect workers on the job, the responsibilities of public-sector employers have not been heretofore addressed. This article analyzes federal laws that pertain to worker safety. These laws will be discussed in light of legal responsibilities placed on public-sector agencies to provide a safe work environment for employees.

Keywords

Injured Worker Parole Officer Disability Retirement Workplace Injury Tort Liability 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Antieau, C., & Mecham, M. (1990).Tort liability of government officers and employees. New York: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
  2. American Jurisprudence 2nd. Master and servant.American Jurisprudence 2nd Sections, 53, 139–291.Google Scholar
  3. American Jurisprudence 2nd. Municipal, etc., tort liability.Google Scholar
  4. American Jurisprudence 2nd Sections,57, 1–223.Google Scholar
  5. American Jurisprudence 2nd. Plant and job safety.American Jurisprudence 2nd Sections,61, 1–140.Google Scholar
  6. American Jurisprudence 2nd. Public officers and employees.Google Scholar
  7. American Jurisprudence 2nd Sections 9–14,63, 358–406.Google Scholar
  8. Blakley, A. (1989). Employer-employee relations: Employment torts come of age; increasing risks of liability for employers and their insurers.Tort and Insurance Law Journal, 24, 168–282.Google Scholar
  9. Branch, J., Jr. (1988).Negligent hiring practice manual. New York, NY: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
  10. Bush, C. (1986/7). The impact of the tort reform act upon the industrial insurance act.Gonzaga Law Review, 22, 121–131.Google Scholar
  11. Case Comments. (1985). Tort law —employer of independent contractor engaged in inherently dangerous work not vicariously liable for injuries sustained by employee of negligent contractor —Vertentes v. Barletta Co., 392 Mass. 165, 466 N.E.2d 500 (1984).Suffolk University Law Review, XIX, 184–192. Comments. (1984). Employees’ assumption of risk: Real or illusory choice?Tennessee Law Review, 52, 35–65.Google Scholar
  12. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and Council 13, American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees, AFL-CIO (1991).Google Scholar
  13. Master agreement between Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and Council 13, American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees, AFL-CIO [In effect 9-16-91].Google Scholar
  14. Farnell, S. (1989). Handling the toxic workplace action.The Practical Lawyer, 35, 81–85.Google Scholar
  15. Florkowski, G. (1989). Personal liability under federal labor and employment laws: Implications for human resource managers.Employee Relations, 14, 593–605.Google Scholar
  16. Gibson, M. (1983).Workers’ rights. Totowa, NJ: Rowman and Allanheld.Google Scholar
  17. Jackson, G. (1986).Labor and employment law desk book. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  18. Krause, T., Hidley, J., & Hodson, S. (1990).The behavior-based safety process: Managing involvement for an injury-free culture. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.Google Scholar
  19. Lees-Haley, P., & Werkow, M. (1989). Confronting employment-related claims for emotional distress.Defense Counsel Journal, 56, 454–459.Google Scholar
  20. Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review. (1986). The peculiar risk doctrine: High rise benefits for California construction workers.Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review, 19, 1495–1533.Google Scholar
  21. Middleton, R., Jr. & Shaffer, M. (1986). The intermediary defense in toxic torts: Handicapping the sophisticated user.Trial, 22, 66–69.Google Scholar
  22. National Law Journal. (1992, January 20). A worker’s safety rights.National Law Journal, 17–18.Google Scholar
  23. Nahmod, S. (1991).Civil rights and civil liberties litigation: The law of Section 1983, 3rd ed. Colorado Springs, CO: Shepard’s/McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
  24. Parsonage, W. (1990).Worker safety in probation and parole. National Institute of Corrections.Google Scholar
  25. Pennsylvania Law Encyclopedia. “Injuries to Employees Not Within Compensation Act.” 21Pennsylvania Law Encyclopedia Chapter 4-Labor - Sections 91–174.Google Scholar
  26. Perlin, M. (1985). The German and British roots of American workers’ compensation systems: When is an ‘intentional act’ ‘intentional’?Seton Hall Law Review, 15, 849–879.Google Scholar
  27. Perritt, H., Jr. (1991).Workplace torts: Rights and liabilities. New York: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
  28. Postol, L. (1986). The federal solution to occupational disease claims —the longshore act and proposed federal programs.Tort and Insurance Law Journal, 21, 199–254.Google Scholar
  29. Preview. (1991, November 22). Personal injury and state action: Are private state torts actionable under the federal civil rights laws?Myra Jo Collins v. The City of Harker Heights, Texas. Preview, 88–92. [A Publication of the American Bar Association’s Public Education Division.]Google Scholar
  30. Restatement of Torts 2nd. Intentionally tortious or criminal acts done under opportunity afforded by actor’s negligence. 16Restatement of Torts 2nd, Section 448.Google Scholar
  31. Silver, I. (1989).Police civil liability. New York: Matthew Bender.Google Scholar
  32. Smith, R. (1983).Workrights. New York: E.P. Dutton.Google Scholar
  33. Sourcebook of Criminal Justice Statistics. (1990). U.S. Department of Justice. 5/.Mary’s Law Journal. (1986).Google Scholar
  34. Workers’ compensation —intentional injury exception to the exclusive remedy provision —an employer’s intentional failure to maintain a safe work place is not an intentional act unless the employer is substantially certain that such conduct would cause the injury.St. Mary’s Law Journal, 17, 513–527.Google Scholar
  35. Sullivan, J.T. (1985). Unexplained accidents and assaults: The problems and burdens of proof under the Texas workers compensation statute.Texas Tech Law Review, 16, 875–937.Google Scholar
  36. Thomen, J. (1991).Leadership in safety management. New York: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
  37. U.S. Chamber of Commerce. (1987).1987 analysis of workers’ compensation laws. U.S. Chamber of Commerce.Google Scholar
  38. van der Smissen, B. (1990).Legal liability and risk management for public and private entities. Cincinnati: Anderson.Google Scholar

Cases Cited

  1. Christensen v. Epley, 585 P.2d 416; aff’m in part, rev in part 601 P.2d 1216 (1979), appeal after remand 644 P2d 627 (1982), judgment rev 678 P.2d 1210 (1984).Google Scholar
  2. Collins v City of Harker Heights, 916 F2d 284 (5th Cir. 1990), cert. granted 111 S.a. 1579 (1991), 112 S.Ct. 1061 (1992).Google Scholar
  3. de Jesus Benavides v. Santos, 883 F2d 385 (5th Cir. 1989).Google Scholar
  4. Martin v. Lancaster Battery Company, 606 A. 2nd 444 (1992).Google Scholar
  5. Mike v. Borough of Aliquippa, 421 A.2d 251 (1980).Google Scholar
  6. Monell v. City of Dept. of Social Services, 436 U.S. 658 (1978).Google Scholar
  7. Rathburn v. Starr Commonwealth for Boys, 377 NW2d 872 (1985).Google Scholar
  8. Reed Tool Co. v. Copelin, 689 SW2d 404 (1985).Google Scholar
  9. Stertz v. Industrial Insurance Commission, 158 P. 256 (1916).Google Scholar
  10. Washington v. District of Columbia, 802 F2d 1478 (DC Cir. 1986).Google Scholar
  11. Williamson v. Smith, 491 P.2d 1147 (1972).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • Frances P. Bernat
    • 1
  1. 1.Arizona State University WestUSA

Personalised recommendations