Annals of Behavioral Medicine

, Volume 20, Issue 4, pp 277–285 | Cite as

Social evaluation influence on cardiovascular response to a fixed behavioral challenge: Effects across a range of difficulty levels

  • Rex A. Wright
  • Jody C. Dill
  • Russell G. Geen
  • Craig A. Anderson


Participants performed five memory tasks—ranging in difficulty from very low to very high—under public or private conditions. The publicity and difficulty variables interacted to determine systolic pressure and heart rate responses during performance. Where performance was public, responsiveness on the parameters increased with difficulty to a point and then dropped; where performance was private, responsiveness was relatively low at all difficulty levels. Diastolic pressure responses were configured similarly, although in that case the interaction was not reliable. Findings corroborate and extend results from a previous study, argue against some explanations of those results, and strengthen the case for a recent active coping analysis of cardiovascular audience effects. Findings also strengthen the case for a broader model of effort and cardiovascular response, which has potential for advancing our understanding of a range of phenomena and processes related to behavior and health.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. (1).
    Triplett N: The dynamogenic factors in pacemaking and competition.American Journal of Psychology. 1898,9: 507–533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. (2).
    Burtt HE: The inspiration-expiration ratio during truth and falsehood.Journal of Experimental Psychology. 1921,4: 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. (3).
    Zajonc RB: Social facilitation.Science. 1965,149: 269–274.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. (4).
    Bond CF, Titus LJ: Social facilitation: A meta-analysis of 241 studies.Psychological Bulletin. 1983,94: 264–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. (5).
    Geen RG, Bushman BJ: The arousing effects of social presence. In Wagner H, Manstead A (eds),Handbook of Social Psychophysiology. London: Wiley, 1989, 261–281.Google Scholar
  6. (6).
    Moore DL, Baron RS: Social facilitation: A psychophysiological analysis. In Cacioppo J, Petty R (eds),Social Psychophysiology: A Sourcebook. New York: Guilford Press, 1983, 434–466.Google Scholar
  7. (7).
    Allen KM, Blascovich J, Tomaka J, Kelsey RM: Presence of human friends and pet dogs as moderators of autonomic responses to stress in women.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1991,61: 582–589.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. (8).
    Cacioppo JT, Rourke PA, Marshall-Goodell BS, Tassinary LG, Baron RS: Rudimentary physiological effects of mere observation.Psychophysiology. 1990,27: 177–186.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. (9).
    Gerin W, Milner D, Chawla S, Pickering TG: Social support as a moderator of cardiovascular reactivity in women: A test of the direct effects and buffering hypotheses.Psychosomatic Medicine, 1995,57: 16–22.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. (10).
    Kamarck TW, Annunziato B, Amateau LM: Affiliation moderates the effects of social threat on stress-related cardiovascular responses: Boundary conditions for a laboratory model of social support.Psychosomatic Medicine. 1995,58: 183–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. (11).
    Brown PC, Smith TW: Social influence, marriage, and the heart: Cardiovascular consequences of interpersonal control in husbands and wives.Health Psychology. 1992,11: 88–96.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. (12).
    Smith TW, Nealey JB, Kircher JC, Limon J: Social determinants of cardiovascular reactivity: Effects of incentive to exert influence and evaluative threat.Psychophysiology. 1997,34: 65–73.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. (13).
    Wright RA, Tunstall AM, Williams BJ, Goodwin JS, Harmon-Jones E: Social evaluation and cardiovascular response: An active coping approach.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1995,69: 530–543.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. (14).
    Wright RA: Brehm's theory of motivation as a model of effort and cardiovascular response. In Gollwitzer PM, Bargh JA (eds),The Psychology of Action: Linking Cognition and Motivation and Behavior. New York: Guilford, 1996, 424–453.Google Scholar
  15. (15).
    Wright RA, Dill JC: Blood pressure responses and incentive appraisals as a function of perceived ability and objective task demand.Psychophysiology. 1993,30: 152–160.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. (16).
    Wright RA, Williams BJ, Dill JC: Interactive effects of difficulty and instrumentality of avoidant behavior on cardiovascular reactivity.Psychophysiology. 1992,29: 677–689.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. (17).
    Obrist PA: The cardiovascular-behavioral interaction as it appears today.Psychophysiology. 1976,13: 95–107.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. (18).
    Obrist PA:Cardiovascular Psychophysiology: A Perspective. New York: Plenum Press, 1981.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. (19).
    Brehm JW Self E: The intensity of motivation. In Rozenweig MR, Porter LW (eds),Annual Review of Psychology. Palo Alto, CA: Annual Reviews, 1989,40: 109–131.Google Scholar
  20. (20).
    Baumeister RF: A self-presentational view of social phenomena.Psychological Bulletin. 1982,91: 656–662.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. (21).
    Geen RG: Social motivation. In Rozenweig MR, Porter LW (eds),Annual Review of Psychology. Palo Alto, CA: Annual Reviews, 1991,42: 377–399.Google Scholar
  22. (22).
    Seta JJ, Seta CE: The impact of personal equity processes on performance in a group setting. In Paulus PB (ed),Basic Group Processes. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1983, 121–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. (23).
    Murray JB, Wright RA, Williams BJ: Difficulty as a determinant of cardiovascular response: Moderating effect of instrumentality in an alleviation paradigm.International Journal of Psychophysiology. 1993,15: 135–145.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. (24).
    Storey PL, Wright RA, Williams BJ: Need as a moderator of the difficulty-cardiovascular response relation: The case of fluid deprivation.Journal of Psychophysiology. 1996,10: 228–238.Google Scholar
  25. (25).
    Wright RA, Shaw LL, Jones CR: Task demand and cardiovascular response magnitude: Further evidence of the mediating role of success importance.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1990,59: 1250–1260.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. (26).
    Manuck SB, Harvey SH, Lechleiter SL, Neal KS: Effects of coping on blood pressure responses to threat of aversive stimulation.Psychophysiology. 1978,15: 544–549.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. (27).
    Cottrell NB, Wack DL, Sekerak GJ, Rittle RH: Social facilitation of dominant responses by the presence of an audience and the mere presence of others.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1968,9: 245–250.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. (28).
    Bond CF: Social facilitation: A self-presentational view.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1982,42: 1042–1050.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. (29).
    Paulus PB: Group influence on individual task performance. In Paulus PB (ed),Basic Group Processes. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1983, 97–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. (30).
    Sanders GS, Baron RS, Moore DL: Distraction and social comparison as mediators of social facilitation effects.Journal of Experimental and Social Psychology. 1978,14: 291–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. (31).
    Geen RG: Human motivation: A social psychological approach. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks-Cole, 1995.Google Scholar
  32. (32).
    Heckhausen H:Motivation and Action. Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag, 1991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. (33).
    Heckhausen H, Strang H: Efficiency under record performance demands: Exertion control—An individual difference variable?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1988,55: 489–498.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. (34).
    Geen RG: The effects of being observed on learning following success and failure experiences.Motivation and Emotion. 1979,3: 355–371CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. (35).
    Wright RA, Dismukes A: Cardiovascular effects of experimentally induced efficacy (ability) appraisals at low and high levels of avoidant task demand.Psychophysiology. 1996,32: 172–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. (36).
    Wright RA: Ability perception and cardiovascular response to behavioral challenge. In Kofta M, Weary G, Sedek G (eds),Personal Control in Action: Cognitive and Motivational Mechanisms. New York: Plenum Press, 1998, 197–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. (37).
    Kukla A: Foundations of an attributional theory of performance.Psychological Review. 1972,79: 454–470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. (38).
    Locke EA, Kristof AL: Volitional choices in the goal achievement process. In Gollwitzer PM, Bargh JA (eds),The Psychology of Action: Linking Cognition and Motivation to Behavior. New York: Guilford Press, 1996, 365–384.Google Scholar
  39. (39).
    Smith TW, Christensen AJ: Life-style and hostility. In Friedman HS (ed),Hostility, Coping, and Health. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, 1992, 33–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. (40).
    Scheier MF, Carver CS: Optimism, coping, and health: Assessment and implications of generalized outcome expectancies.Health Psychology. 1985,4: 219–247.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. (41).
    Stoney CM, Davis MC, Matthews KA: Sex differences in physiological responses to stress and in coronary disease: A causal link?Psychophysiology. 1987,24: 127–131.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. (42).
    Anderson NB, McNeilly M, Myers H: A biosocial model of race differences in vascular reactivity. In Blascovich J, Katkin ES (eds),Cardiovascular Reactivity to Psychological Stress and Disease. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, 1993, 83–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. (43).
    Brehm JW, Brummett BH: The emotional control of behavior. In Kofta M, Weary G, Sedek G (eds),Personal Control in Action: Cognitive and Motivational Mechanisms. New York: Plenum Press, 1998, 133–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. (44).
    Wright RA, Murray JB, Storey PL, Williams BJ: Ability analysis of gender relevance and sex differences in cardiovascular response to behavioral challenge.Journal of Personality and social Psychology. 1997,73: 405–417.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Society of Behavioral Medicine 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rex A. Wright
    • 1
  • Jody C. Dill
    • 2
  • Russell G. Geen
    • 2
  • Craig A. Anderson
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversity of AlabamaBirmingham
  2. 2.University of Missouri at ColumbiaColumbiaUSA

Personalised recommendations