Factors influencing the use of the “truth in sentencing” law in Kentucky murder cases: A research note
Notes & Comments
Abstract
This study is based upon a data set on the capital sentencing process in Kentucky. Here, we examine the effect of Kentucky’s “truth in sentencing” statute on murder cases. The evidence suggests that a sentence of life without possibility of parole can serve as an alternative to capital sentencing that avoids racial discrimination.
Keywords
Death Penalty Violent Offense Murder Case Capital Case Homicide Case
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- Barnett, A. (1985). Some distribution patterns for the Georgia death sentence.U.C. Davis Law Review, 18, 1375–1374.Google Scholar
- Cheatwood, D. (1988). The life without parole sanction: Its current status and a research Agenda.Crime and Delinquency, 34, 43–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Keil, T.J., & Vito, G.F. (1990). Race and the death penalty in Kentucky murder trials: An analysis of post-Gregg outcomes.Justice Quarterly, 7, 189–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Keil, T.J., & Vito, G.F. (1989). Race, homicide severity, and the application of the death penalty: Consideration of the Barnett scale.Criminology, 27, 511–536.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Smith, B.L., & Stevens, E.H. (1984). Sentence disparity and the judge-jury sentencing debate: An analysis of robbery sentences in six southern states.Criminal Justice Review, 9, 1–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cases Cited
- Greenholtz v.Inmates of Nebraska, 99 S.Ct. 2100 (1979).Google Scholar
- Sanders v.Commonwealth, 844 S.W.2d 391 (Ky. 1993).Google Scholar
- Taylor v. Commonwealth, 821 S.W.2d 72 (Ky. 1991).Google Scholar
Copyright information
© Springer 1995