Advertisement

American Journal of Criminal Justice

, Volume 30, Issue 1, pp 55–69 | Cite as

Mental health, gender, and drug court completion

  • Alison R. GrayEmail author
  • Christine A. Saum
Article

Abstract

Drug-involved offenders report high rates of mental health problems that can negatively impact criminal justice outcomes. Yet, relatively little attention has been given to the mental health issues of drug court offenders. Therefore, this study examined 449 participants in a Delaware drug court and investigated relationships between mental health, gender, and program completion. Bivariate results indicated that gender was related to both mental health status and completion status. Multivariate findings revealed that two indicators of mental health, depression and being prescribed drugs for a psychological or emotional problem, were significant predictors of drug court completion. Policy implications include assessing the mental health status of all drug court participants at program entry so that services can be provided which aim to improve offender health and increase the likelihood of successful program outcomes. Drug courts must better meet the needs of participants with co-occurring disorders if they are to remain an effective and viable criminal justice intervention.

Keywords

Mental Health Mental Health Problem Mental Health Status Criminal History Drug Court 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bavon, A. (2001). The effect of the Tarrant County drug court project on recidivism.Evaluation and Program Planning, 24, 13–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Belenko, S. (1999). Research on drug courts: A critical review.National Drug Court Institute Review, 1 (1), 1–42.Google Scholar
  3. Belenko, S. (2001).Research on drug Courts: A critical review. New York: Columbia University.Google Scholar
  4. Butzin, C. A., Saum, C. A., & Scarpitti, F. R. (2002). Factors associated with completion of a drug court diversion program.Substance Use and Misuse, 37, 1615–1633.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Compton, W. M., Cottier, L. B., Jacobs, J. L., Ben-Abdallah, A., & Spitznagel, E. L. (2003). The role of psychiatric disorders in predicting drug dependence treatment outcomes.American Journal of Psychiatry, 160, 890–895.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cooper, C. S. (1997).1997 Drug court survey report. Washington, D.C.: United States Department of Justice.Google Scholar
  7. D’Angelo, L. & Wolf, R. V. (2002). Women and addiction: Challenges for drug court practitioners.The Justice System Journal, 23, 385–400.Google Scholar
  8. Dannerbeck, A., Sundet, P., & Lloyd, K. (2002). Drug courts: Gender differences and their implications for treatment strategies.Corrections Compendium, 27 (12), 1–10.Google Scholar
  9. Drug Courts Program Office. (1997).Defining drug courts: The key components. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Justice.Google Scholar
  10. Fielding, J. E., Tye, G., Ogawa, P. L., Imam, I. J. & Long, A. M. (2002). Los Angeles County drug court programs: Initial results.Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 23, 217–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Goldkamp, J. S., White, M. D., & Robinson, J. B. (2001). Do drug courts work? Getting inside the drug court black box.Journal of Drug Issues, 31, 27–72.Google Scholar
  12. Gossweiller, R. S., & Martin, S. S. (1996). The role of personality in treatment outcome for drug involved offenders.International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 16 (5/6), 131–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gottfredson, D. C., Kearley, B. W., Najaka, S. S., & Rocha, C. M. (2005). The Baltimore city drug treatment court: 3-year self-report outcome study.Evaluation Review, 29, 42–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hagedorn, H., & Willenbring, M. (2003). Psychiatric illness among drug court probationers.American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse, 29, 775–788.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Harrell, A., Roman, J. & Sack, E. (2001).Drug court services for female offenders, 1996–1999: Evaluation of the Brooklyn treatment court. Justice Policy Center, Urban Institute.Google Scholar
  16. Jainchill, N., De Leon, G., & Pinkham, L. (1986). Psychiatric diagnosis among substance abusers in therapeutic community treatment.Journal of Psychoactive Drugs, 18, 209–213.Google Scholar
  17. Johnson-Listwan, S., Koetzle-Shaffer, D., & Latessa, E. J. (2002). The drug court movement: Recommendations for improvements.Corrections Today, 64 (5), 52–57.Google Scholar
  18. Langan, N.P., & Pelissier, B.M. (2001). Gender differences among prisoners in drug treatment.Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 13, 291–301.Google Scholar
  19. Longshore, D., Turner, S., Wenzel, S., Morral, A., Harrell, A., McBride, D., Deschenes, E., & Iguchi, M. (2001). Drug courts: A conceptual framework.Journal of Drug Issues, 31, 7–26.Google Scholar
  20. Mateyoke-Scrivner, A., Webster, J. M., Staton, M., & Leukefeld, C. (2004). Treatment retention predictors of drug court participants in a rural state.American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse, 30, 605–626.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Nunes, E. V., & Levin, F. R. (2004). Treatment of depression in patients with alcohol or other drug dependence: A meta-analysis.Journal of the American Medical Association, 291, 1887–1896.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Peters, R. H., & Murrin, M. R. (2000). Effectiveness of treatment-based drug courts in reducing criminal recidivism.Criminal Justice and Behavior, 27, 72–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Saum, C. A., Scarpitti, F. R., & Robbins, C. A. (2001). Violent offenders in drug court.Journal of Drug Issues, 31, 107–128.Google Scholar
  24. Securest, D. K., & Shicor, D. (2001). Determinants of graduation from a day treatment drug court in California: A preliminary study.Journal of Drug Issues, 31, 129–148.Google Scholar
  25. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. (2002).Report to Congress on the prevention and treatment of co-occurring substance abuse disorders and mental disorders. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.Google Scholar
  26. Taxman, F. S. (1999). Unraveling ‘what works’ for offenders in substance abuse treatment services.National Drug Court Institute Review, 2, 93–134.Google Scholar
  27. Treatment Research Institute. (1990).Addiction severity index manual and question by question guide. The University of Pennsylvania/Veterans Administration Center for Studies of Addiction.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Center for Drug & Alcohol StudiesUniversity of DelawareNewark

Personalised recommendations