Journal of Economics and Finance

, Volume 31, Issue 3, pp 403–411 | Cite as

Does giving make us prosperous?

Arts and Culture Symposium

Abstract

Nonprofit economists have always assumed that income is a precursor to giving. In contrast, many philosophical and religious teachings have asserted that it is giving that leads to prosperity. This article seeks to test the non-economic hypothesis, using data from the 2000 Social Capital Community Benchmark Survey. It identifies strong evidence that money giving does, in fact, influence income. This is consistent with extant psychology research which clearly shows that volunteering leads to positive mental and physical health outcomes. The implication of these findings for researchers and managers is that the value of charity is not limited to those who receive the services that giving makes possible. On the contrary, charity unleashes substantial benefits to the givers themselves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. American Association of Fundraising Council (AAFRC). Various years,Giving USA. Glenview, IL: AAFRC.Google Scholar
  2. Bandura, A. 1994. Self-efficacy. In V. S. Ramachaudran (Ed.),Encyclopedia of Human Behavior (Vol. 4, pp. 71–81). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  3. Bound, J., D.A. Jaeger, and R.M. Baker. 1995. “Problems with Instrumental Variables Estimation When the Correlation between the Instruments and the Endogenous Explanatory Variables Is Weak.”Journal of the American Statistical Association 90: 443–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brooks, A.C. 2005. “Does Social Capital Make You Generous?” Social Science Quarterly 86: 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brooks, A.C. 2004a. “Faith, Secularism, and Charity.”Faith and Economics 43: 1–8.Google Scholar
  6. Brooks, A.C. 2004b. “The Effects of Public Policy on Private Charity.”Administration & Society 36: 166–185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brooks, A.C. 2002. “Welfare Receipt and Private Charity.”Public Budgeting and Finance 22: 100–113.Google Scholar
  8. Brooks, J. 2004. “Donor Power: How to Meet the New Generation of Donors.”Loyalty. Newsletter of the Domain Group.Google Scholar
  9. Center on Philanthropy Panel Study. (COPPS). 2001. In thePanel Study of Income Dynamics Wave XXXII Computer File. Ann Arbor, MI: ICPSR. http://simba.isr.umich.edu)Google Scholar
  10. Center on Philanthropy Panel Study. (COPPS). 2003. In thePanel Study of Income Dynamics Wave XXXIII Computer File. Ann Arbor, MI: ICPSR. http://simba.isr.umich.edu)Google Scholar
  11. Clotfelter, C.T. 1985.Federal Tax Policy and Charitable Giving. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  12. Clotfelter, C.T., and E. Steuerte. 1981. “Charitable Contributions.” InHow Taxes Affect Economic Behavior, Aaron, Henry, and Joseph Pechman eds. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution, 403–437.Google Scholar
  13. Covinsky, K.E, R. Newcomer, P. Fox, J. Wood, L. Sands, K. Dane, and K. Yaffe. 2003. “Patient and Caregiver Characteristics Associated With Depression in Caregivers of Patients With Dementia.”Journal of General Internal Medicine 18: 1006–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gair, C. 2005. “A Report From the Good Ship SROI.” REDF report. http://www.redf.org)Google Scholar
  15. Granger, C.W.J. 1969. “Investigating Causal Relations by Econometric Models and Cross-Spectral Methods.” Econometrica 37: 424–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Henry, M. 2000 [1706-1721].Commentary on the Whole Bible. Grand Rapids, MI: Christian Classics Ethereal LibraryGoogle Scholar
  17. Hodgkinson, V.A., and Weitzman, M.S. 1996.Giving and Volunteering in the United States: Findings from a National Survey. Washington, D.C.: Independent Sector.Google Scholar
  18. Luks, A., and E. Payne. 1991.The Healing Power of Doing Good: The Health and Spiritual Benefits of Helping Others. New York: Fawcett ColumbineGoogle Scholar
  19. Moore, C.A. May 3, 2003. “Wealth & Faith: The More Philanthropists Give, the More They Enjoy Giving.” Deseret News.Google Scholar
  20. Putnam, R. D. 2000.Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
  21. Putnam, R.D. 1995. “Bowling Alone: America’s Declining Social Capital.”Journal of Democracy 6: 65–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Roper Center for Public Opinion Research. 2000.Social Capital Community Benchmark Survey. www.roper.comGoogle Scholar
  23. Schwartz, C.E., and Rabbi M. Sendor. 1999. “Helping Others Helps Oneself: Response Shift Effects in Peer Support.”Social Science and Medicine 48: 1563–1575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Schwartz, C., J.B. Meisenhelder, Y. Ma, and G. Reed. 2003. “Altruistic Social Interest Behaviors Are Associated With Better Mental Health.”Psychosomatic Medicine 65: 778–785.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Steinberg, R. 1990. “Taxes and Giving: New Findings.”Voluntas 1: 61–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Steinberg, R. 1993. “Does Government Spending Crowd Out Donations? Interpreting the Evidence.” In Ben-Ner, A. & Gui, B. Eds.The Nonprofit Sector in the Mixed Economy. Ann Arbor, MI: The Univ. of Michigan Press, 99–125.Google Scholar
  27. Steinberg, R. 1997. “Overall Evaluation of Economic Theories.”Voluntas 8: 179–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Maxwell School of Citizenship & Public AffairsSyracuse UniversitySyracuse

Personalised recommendations