Efficacy of an individualized, motivationally-tailored physical activity intervention
- 2.1k Downloads
This study compared the efficacy of two low-cost interventions for physical activity adoption. Sedentary (N=194) adults recruited through newspaper advertisements were randomized to receive either a motivationally-matched, individually-tailored intervention (IT) or a standard self-help intervention (ST). Assessments and interventions were delivered by repeated mailings at baseline, one, three, and six months. Participants were assessed regarding current physical activity behavior, motivational readiness to adopt regular physical activity, and psychological constructs associated with physical activity participation (e.g. self-efficacy, decisional balance). Repeated measures analyses of variance (ANOVAs) revealed significant increases in physical activity participation between baseline and six months for both groups with a significantly greater increase among IT participants. The IT group outperformed the ST group on all primary outcome measures: (a) minutes of physical activity per week, (b) reaching Centers for Disease Control and American College of Sports Medicine (CDC/ACSM) recommended minimum physical activity criteria, and (c) achieving the Action stage of motivational readiness for physical activity adoption. Both groups showed significant improvement between baseline and six months on the psychological constructs associated with physical activity adoption (e.g. self-efficacy), with no significant differences observed between the treatment groups. Utilizing computer expert systems and self-help manuals to provide individually-tailored, motivationally-matched interventions appears to be an effective, low-cost approach for enhancing physical activity participation in the community.
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- (1).U.S. Department of Health and Human Services:Physical Activity and Health: A Report of the Surgeon General. Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, 1996.Google Scholar
- (4).Dishman RK: Overview. In Dishman RK (ed),Exercise Adherence. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics, 1988, 1–9.Google Scholar
- (5).Bandura A:Social Foundations of Thought and Action. A Social Cognitive Theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1986.Google Scholar
- (6).Janis IL, Mann L:Decision Making: A Psychological Analysis of Conflict, Choice, and Commitment. New York: Collier Macmillan, 1977, 1–10.Google Scholar
- (19).Marcus BH, Abrams DB, Parisi AF, Albrecht AE: Smoking cessation, weight gain, and exercise in women. National Cancer Institute Grant #R29CA59660, 1993.Google Scholar
- (23).Dishman RK, Sallis JF: Determinants and interventions for physical activity and exercise. In Bouchard C, Shephard RJ, Stephens T (eds),Physical Activity, Fitness, and Health: International Proceedings and Consensus Statement. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics, 1994, 214–238.Google Scholar
- (26).American Heart Association:Walking for a Healthy Heart. Dallas, TX: American Heart Association, 1984.Google Scholar
- (27).American Heart Association:Swimming for a Healthy Heart. Dallas, TX: American Heart Association, 1984.Google Scholar
- (28).American Heart Association,Cycling for a Healthy Heart. Dallas, TX: American Heart Association, 1984.Google Scholar
- (29).American Heart Association,Exercise Diary. Dallas, TX: American Heart Association, 1993.Google Scholar