Annals of Behavioral Medicine

, Volume 20, Issue 2, pp 64–69 | Cite as

The effects of marital transitions on changes in physical activity: Results from a 10-year community study

  • Abby C. King
  • Michaela Kiernan
  • David K. Ahn
  • Sara Wilcox
Article

Abstract

The potential effects of making a marital transition on subsequent physical activity were evaluated across a ten-year period in a population-based sample of 302 women and 256 men ages 25 to 75 years. Subjects completed a structured interview at five timepoints throughout the ten-year period during which they reported on their physical activity level as well as marital status. The transition from a married to a single state did not affect physical activity relative to remaining married when analyses of either slopes or mean values were used. In contrast, the transition from a single to a married state resulted in significant positive changes in physical activity relative to remaining single throughout the study period when physical activity slopes, though not means, were compared. The results suggest that marriage may potentially set the stage for natural changes in physical activity that could be capitalized on through appropriate intervention, but additional research is needed to verify this in light of the inconsistent pattern of findings.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. (1).
    Bouchard C, Shephard RJ, Stephens T (eds):Physical Activity, Fitness, and Health: International Proceedings and Consensus Statement. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics, 1994.Google Scholar
  2. (2).
    U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion:Physical Activity and Health: A Report of the Surgeon General. Atlanta, GA: 1996.Google Scholar
  3. (3).
    King AC, Blair SN, Bild DE, et al: Determinants of physical activity and intervention in adults.Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise. 1992,24:S221-S236.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. (4).
    Prochaska JO, DiClemente CC: States and processes of self-change in smoking: Toward an integrative model of change.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 1983,51:390–395.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. (5).
    Marcus BH, Simkin LR: The transtheoretical model: Applications to exercise behavior.Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise. 1994,26:1400–1404.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. (6).
    Felner RD, Farber SS, Primavera J: Transitions and stressful life events: A model for primary prevention. In Felner RD, Jason LA, Moritsugu JN, Farber SS (eds),Preventive Psychology: Theory, Research, and Practice, New York: Pergamon Press, 1983, 42–67.Google Scholar
  7. (7).
    King AC: Community intervention for promotion of physical activity and fitness.Exercise and Sport Sciences Reviews. 1991,19:211–259.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. (8).
    Winett RA, King AC, Altman DG:Health Psychology and Public Health: An Integrative Approach. Elmsford, NY: Pergamon Press, 1989.Google Scholar
  9. (9).
    Bloom BL:Community Mental Health: A General Introduction (2nd Ed.). Belmont, CA: Brooks/Cole, 1984.Google Scholar
  10. (10).
    Klorman R, Hilpert PL, Michael R, LaGana C, Sveen OB: Effects of coping and mastery modeling on experienced and unexperienced pedodontic patients' disruptiveness.Behavior Therapy. 1980,11:156–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. (11).
    Owens JF, Matthews KA, Wing RR, Kuller LH: Can physical activity mitigate the effects of aging in middle-aged women?Circulation. 1992,85:1265–1270.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. (12).
    Gove W: Sex, marital status, and mortality.American Journal of Sociology. 1973,79:45–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. (13).
    House J, Landis K, Umberson D: Social relations and health.Science. 1988,241:540–545.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. (14).
    Goldman N, Korenman S, Weinstein R: Martial status and health among the elderly.Social Science and Medicine. 1995,40:1717–1730.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. (15).
    Hu YR, Goldman N: Mortality by marital status: An international comparison.Demography. 1990,27:233–250.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. (16).
    Reissman C, Gerstel N: Marital dissolution and health: Do males or females have greater risk?Social Science and Medicine. 1985,20:627–635.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. (17).
    Stroebe M, Stroebe W: Who suffers more? Sex differences in health risks of the widowed.Psychological Bulletin. 1983,93:279–301.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. (18).
    Wingard D: The sex differential in morbidity, mortality, and lifestyle.Annual Review of Public Health. 1984,5:433–458.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. (19).
    Umberson D: Family status and health behaviors: Social control as a dimension of social integration.Journal of Health and Social Behavior. 1987,28:306–319.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. (20).
    Umberson D: Gender, marital status, and the social control of health behavior.Social Science and Medicine. 1992,34:907–917.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. (21).
    Joung IM, Stronks K, van de Mheen H, Mackenbach JP: Health behaviours explain part of the differences in self-reported health associated with partner/marital status in The Netherlands.Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health. 1995,49:482–488.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. (22).
    Case RB, Moss AJ, Case N, McDermott M, Eberly S: Living alone after myocardial infarction: Impact on prognosis.Journal of the American Medical Association. 1992,267:515–519.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. (23).
    Ford ES, Jones DH: Cardiovascular health knowledge in the United States: Findings from the National Health Interview Survey, 1985.Preventive Medicine. 1991,20:725–736.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. (24).
    Temple MT, Fillmore KM, Hartka E, et al: A meta-analysis of change in marital and employment status as predictors of alcohol consumption on a typical occasion.British Journal of Addiction. 1991,86:1269–1281.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. (25).
    Wickrama K, Conger RD, Lorenz FO: Work, marriage, lifestyle, and changes in men's physical health.Journal of Behavioral Medicine. 1995,18:97–111.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. (26).
    Kahn HS, Williamson DF: The contributions of income, education, and changing marital status to weitht change among U.S. men.International Journal of Obesity. 1990,14:1057–1068.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. (27).
    Kahn HS, Williamson DF, Stevens JA: Race and weight change in U.S. women: The roles of socioeconomic and marital status.American Journal of Public Health. 1991,81:319–323.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. (29).
    Farquhar JW, Fortmann SP, Maccoby N, et al: The Stanford Five-City Project: Design and methods.Journal of the American Medical Association. 1985,122:323–334.Google Scholar
  29. (29).
    Farquhar JW, Fortmann SP, Flora JA, et al: The Stanford Five-City Project: Effects of community-wide education on cardiovascular disease risk factors.Journal of the American Medical Association. 1990,264:359–365.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. (30).
    Young DR, Haskell WL, Taylor CB, Fortmann SP: Effect of community health education on physical activity knowledge, attitudes, and behavior: The Stanford Five-City Project.American Journal of Epidemiology. 1996,144:264–274.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. (31).
    Blair SN, Haskell WL, Ho P, et al: Assessment of habitual physical activity by a seven-day recall in a community survey and controlled experiments.American Journal of Epidemiology. 1986,122:794–804.Google Scholar
  32. (32).
    Spector PC, Goodnight JH, Sall JP, Sarle WS: The GLM procedure. InSAS User's Guide: Statistics, Version 5 Edition. Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc., 1985, 433–506.Google Scholar
  33. (33).
    Kraemer HC, Thiemann SA: A strategy to use “soft” data effectively in randomized clinical trials.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 1989,57:148–154.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. (34).
    Verhoef MJ, Love EJ: Women's exercise participation: The relevance of social roles compared to non-role-related determinants.Canadian Journal of Public Health. 1992,83(5):367–370.Google Scholar
  35. (35).
    Waldron I, Hughes ME, Brooks TL: Marriage protection and marriage selection—Prospective evidence for reciprocal effects of marital status and health.Social Science and Medicine. 1996,43:113–123.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Society of Behavioral Medicine 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • Abby C. King
    • 1
  • Michaela Kiernan
    • 1
  • David K. Ahn
    • 1
  • Sara Wilcox
    • 1
  1. 1.Stanford University School of MedicinePalo Alto

Personalised recommendations