The effects of marital transitions on changes in physical activity: Results from a 10-year community study
- 340 Downloads
The potential effects of making a marital transition on subsequent physical activity were evaluated across a ten-year period in a population-based sample of 302 women and 256 men ages 25 to 75 years. Subjects completed a structured interview at five timepoints throughout the ten-year period during which they reported on their physical activity level as well as marital status. The transition from a married to a single state did not affect physical activity relative to remaining married when analyses of either slopes or mean values were used. In contrast, the transition from a single to a married state resulted in significant positive changes in physical activity relative to remaining single throughout the study period when physical activity slopes, though not means, were compared. The results suggest that marriage may potentially set the stage for natural changes in physical activity that could be capitalized on through appropriate intervention, but additional research is needed to verify this in light of the inconsistent pattern of findings.
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- (1).Bouchard C, Shephard RJ, Stephens T (eds):Physical Activity, Fitness, and Health: International Proceedings and Consensus Statement. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics, 1994.Google Scholar
- (2).U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion:Physical Activity and Health: A Report of the Surgeon General. Atlanta, GA: 1996.Google Scholar
- (6).Felner RD, Farber SS, Primavera J: Transitions and stressful life events: A model for primary prevention. In Felner RD, Jason LA, Moritsugu JN, Farber SS (eds),Preventive Psychology: Theory, Research, and Practice, New York: Pergamon Press, 1983, 42–67.Google Scholar
- (8).Winett RA, King AC, Altman DG:Health Psychology and Public Health: An Integrative Approach. Elmsford, NY: Pergamon Press, 1989.Google Scholar
- (9).Bloom BL:Community Mental Health: A General Introduction (2nd Ed.). Belmont, CA: Brooks/Cole, 1984.Google Scholar
- (29).Farquhar JW, Fortmann SP, Maccoby N, et al: The Stanford Five-City Project: Design and methods.Journal of the American Medical Association. 1985,122:323–334.Google Scholar
- (31).Blair SN, Haskell WL, Ho P, et al: Assessment of habitual physical activity by a seven-day recall in a community survey and controlled experiments.American Journal of Epidemiology. 1986,122:794–804.Google Scholar
- (32).Spector PC, Goodnight JH, Sall JP, Sarle WS: The GLM procedure. InSAS User's Guide: Statistics, Version 5 Edition. Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc., 1985, 433–506.Google Scholar
- (34).Verhoef MJ, Love EJ: Women's exercise participation: The relevance of social roles compared to non-role-related determinants.Canadian Journal of Public Health. 1992,83(5):367–370.Google Scholar