American Potato Journal

, Volume 29, Issue 1, pp 8–16 | Cite as

Potato vine killing methods as related to rate of kill, vascular discoloration, and virus disease spread

  • C. E. Cunningham
  • P. J. Eastman
  • Michael Goven
Article

Summary

The effect of various vine-killing methods on five varieties of potatoes was studied over the 1948–1950 period.

All varieties were killed more easily as they matured. Later-maturing varieties were more difficult to kill than the earlier-maturing.

Of the chemicals used, the dinitros and tar acids gave the most rapid rate of kill, the arsenicals an intermediate rate, and cyanamid a relatively slow rate of kill.

The greatest amount of discoloration occurred in the early-maturing varieties. With the exception of the rotobeater and hand-pulling, those materials or methods that killed the vines most rapidly tended to produce the greatest amount of vascular discoloration. The amount of vascular discoloration produced by vine-killing tended to increase with age of the plants until the plants were maturing rapidly, at which time there was a decline in the amount of discoloration. No appreciable fading or increase in vascular discoloration was detected in tubers during storage of 5 varieties at 37° and 50°F. when examined in November and February. The amount of discoloration did not appear to increase or fade in Irish Cobbler tubers when examined at intervals of one and two weeks after application of the material.

Rotobeating potato vines followed by a chemical spray reduced the spread of the leafroll virus, as compared with rotobeating alone or chemical vine-killing alone.

Keywords

AMERICAN Potato Journal Cyanamid Irish Cobbler Potato Jour Chemical Spray 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature cited

  1. 1.
    Bonde, R. and Schultz, E. S. 1945. The control of potato late-blight tuber rot. Amer. Potato Jour. 22:163–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    -, and -. 1949. Control of late-blight tuber rot. Maine Agr. Exp. Sta. Bull. 471.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Callbeck, H. C. 1948. Current results with potato vine killers in Prince Edward Island. Amer. Potato Jour. 25:225–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    —. 1949. Potato vine-killing in Prince Edward Island. Amer. Potato Jour. 26:409–419.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Folsom, D. 1942. Stem-end browning storage studies. Maine Agr. Exp. Sta. Bull. 411:301–302.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    — and Goven, M. 1943. Storage temperatures and stem-end browning. Maine Agr. Exp. Sta. Bull. 420:339–340.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    — and — 1944. Stem-end browning storage temperatures. Maine Agr. Exp. Sta. Bull. 426:231–232.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    —and Rich, A. E. 1940. Potato tuber net-necrosis and stem-end browning studies in Maine. Phytopath. 30:313–332.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hoyman, W. G. 1947. Observations on the use of potato vine-killers in the Red River Valley of North Dakota. Amer. Potato Jour. 24:110–116.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    — 1948. Potato-vine killers. (Abstract) Amer. Potato Jour. 25:52.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Prince, A. E., et al. 1948. Potato top killing. Maine Agr. Exp. Sta. Bull. 460: 36–37.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Rich, A. E. 1950. The effect of various defoliants on potato vines and tubers in Washington. Amer. Potato Jour. 27:87–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Schultz, E. S. and Folsom, D. 1920. Transmission of the mosaic disease of Irish potatoes. Jour. Agr. Res. 19:315–337.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    −, Bonde, R. and Raleigh, W. P. 1944. Early harvesting of healthy seed potatoes for the control of potato diseases in Maine. Maine Agr. Exp. Sta. Bull. 427.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Steinbauer, G. P. 1946. Potato vine-killing. Maine Agr. Exp. Sta. Mimeo. Report.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Upton, F. and Folsom, D. 1941. Stem-end browning and net necrosis in storage. Maine Agr. Exp. Sta. Bull. 405:502–503.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 1952

Authors and Affiliations

  • C. E. Cunningham
    • 1
  • P. J. Eastman
    • 1
  • Michael Goven
    • 1
  1. 1.Maine Agricultural Experiment StationOrono

Personalised recommendations