Advertisement

Science in China Series B: Chemistry

, Volume 41, Issue 2, pp 113–121 | Cite as

SPC cluster modeling of metal oxides: ways of determining the values of point charges in the embedded cluster model

  • Xin Xu
  • Hiroshi Nakatsuji
  • Masahiro Ehara
  • Xin Lü
  • Nanqin Wang
  • Qianer Zhang
Article

Abstract

Several criteria for determining self-consistently the magnitude of point charges employed in the embedded cluster modeling of metal oxides have been proposed and investigated. Merits and demerits of these criteria have been compared.Ab initio study has been performed to show the influence of the values of point charges chosen on the calculated electronic properties of the embedded MgO cluster. The calculation results demonstrate that the electronic properties of the embedded cluster are of great dependence on the magnitude of the embedding point charges; that the employment of the nominal charges, ±2.0, would cause overestimation of the crystal potential even in the case of the so-called purely ionic oxide. MgO; and that certain requirements for the consistence between the embedded cluster and the embedding point charges should be reached. It is further found that errors for the calculated properties of the embedded cluster still exist with respect to those of bulk solid even in the case that self-consistence in terms of charge, dipole moment, or electrostatic potential was met between the cut-out cluster and the embedding point charges. As far as spherical expansion is performed upon the embedding point charges, which furnishes the embedding point charges with a continuous distribution of charge density, a global agreement is reached between the calculated properties of the embedded cluster model and those of the bulk solid.

Keywords

metal oxides duster-surface analogy embedded cluster model SPC cluster model 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Kung, H. H.,Transition Metal Okides: Surface Chemistry and Catalysis, Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1989.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Freund, H. -J., Umbach, E.,Adsorption on Ordered Surfaces of Ionic Solids and Thin Films, Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1994.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Sauer, J., Molecular models inab initio studies of solids and surfaces: from ionic crystals and semiconductors to catalysis,Chem. Rev., 1989, 89(1): 199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Sauer, J., Ugliengo, P., Garrone, E., Theoretical study of van der Waals complexes at surface sites in comparison with the experiment,Chem. Rev., 1994, 94: 2095.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Colbourn, E. A., Computer simulation of defects and reactions at oxides surfaces,Surf. Sci. Rep., 1992, 15: 281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Pacchioni, G., Illas, F., Does the electronegativity scale apply to ionic crystals as to molecules? A theoretical study of the bonding character in molecular and crystalline alkaline-earth oxides based on dipole moments,Chem. Phys., 1995, 199: 155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Pacchioni, G., Neyman, K. M., Rosch, N., CO adsorption on the (001) surface of MgO: a comparison of Hartree-Fock and local density functional results,J. Electron Spectrosc. Relat. Phenom., 1994, 96: 13.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Xu, X., Lu, X., Wang, N. Q. et al., Charge-consistency modeling of CO/NiO(100) chemisorption system.Chem. Phys. Letters, 1995, 235: 541.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Xu, G., Wang, X.,Structure of Matter (in Chinese), Beijing: Higher Education Press, 1987, 621.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Wyckoff, R. W. G.,Crystal Structures, New York: John Willey, 1963.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Frisch, M. J., Trucks, G. W., Schlegel, H. B. et al., Gaussian 92, Gaussian, Inc., Pittsburgh, P. A., 1993.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Dupuis, M., Farazdel, A., King, H. F. et al.,Hando8From MOTECC-91, IBM Corporation, Center for Scientific & Engineering Computations. NY 12401. USA.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Science in China Press 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • Xin Xu
    • 1
    • 2
  • Hiroshi Nakatsuji
    • 2
  • Masahiro Ehara
    • 2
  • Xin Lü
    • 1
  • Nanqin Wang
    • 1
  • Qianer Zhang
    • 1
  1. 1.State Key Laboratory for Physical Chemistry of Solid Surfaces, Institute of Physical ChemistryDepartment of Chemistry, Xiamen UniversityXiamenChina
  2. 2.Department of Synthetic Chemistry and BiochemistryFaculty of Engineering, Kyoto UniversityKyotoJapan

Personalised recommendations