Annals of Behavioral Medicine

, Volume 34, Issue 3, pp 295–303 | Cite as

The relation of acculturation to latinas’ perceived neighborhood safety and physical activity: A structural equation analysis

  • Latrice C. Pichon
  • Elva M. Arredondo
  • Scott Roesch
  • James F. Sallis
  • Guadalupe X. Ayala
  • John P. Elder


Background: Physical activity rates are low for adult Latinas. In the United States, only 7.8% of adult Latinas met Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommendations for weekly vigorous leisure-time physical activity.Purpose: The purpose of this study is to test a theoretical model examining the direct and indirect influence of individual factors (demographic factors and acculturation) and the direct influence of built environmental variables (perceived neighborhood safety/aesthetics) on Latinas’ physical activity in a U.S. border region.Methods: Acculturation, perceived neighborhood safety/aesthetics, sociodemographic variables, and minutes of physical activity a week were collected from 526 Latinas using standardized survey measures.Results: Only 30% of the Latinas reported meeting International Physical Activity Questionnaire’s vigorous physical activity criteria, 8.6% met moderate, and 46.4% met walking. Findings from the structural equation modeling indicated that acculturation was positively associated with Latinas’ vigorous and moderate physical activity, with no significant relation to walking. There were no direct associations of perceived neighborhood safety/aesthetics on any of the three measures of physical activity.Conclusions: Data suggest that acculturating to the U.S. mainstream culture may have positive effects on Latinas’ reported physical activity. Contrary to studies of other populations, the perceived neighborhood environment was not related to Latinas’ physical activity. Culturally appropriate interventions are needed for Latinas who are less acculturated into the United States.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. (1).
    Schoenborn CA, Adams PF, Barnes PM, Vickerie JL, Schiller JS: Health behaviors of adults: United States, 1999–2001.Vital and Health Statistics. Series 10: Data from the National Health Survey. 2004,219:1–79.Google Scholar
  2. (2).
    Evenson KR, Sarmiento OL, Tawney KW, Macon ML, Ammerman AS: Personal, social, and environmental correlates of physical activity in North Carolina Latina immigrants.American Journal of Preventive Medicine. 2003,25(Suppl. 1):77–85.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. (3).
    Voorhees CC, Rohm Young D: Personal, social, and physical environmental correlates of physical activity levels in urban Latinas.American Journal of Preventive Medicine. 2003,25(Suppl. 1):61–68.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. (4).
    Wilbur J, Chandler PJ, Dancy B, Lee H: Correlates of physical activity in urban midwestern Latinas.American Journal of Preventive Medicine. 2003,25(Suppl, 1):69–76.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. (5).
    Cuéllar I, Arnold B, Maldonado R: Acculturation rating scale for Mexican Americans-ii: A revision of the original ARSMA scale.Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences. 1995,17:275–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. (6).
    Crespo CJ, Smit E, Carter-Pokras O, Andersen R: Acculturation and leisure-time physical inactivity in Mexican American adults: Results from NHANES III, 1988–1994.American Journal of Public Health. 2001,91:1254–1257.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. (7).
    Evenson KR, Sarmiento OL, Ayala GX: Acculturation and physical activity among North Carolina Latina immigrants.Social Science and Medicine. 2004,59:2509–2522.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. (8).
    Stokols D: Translating social ecological theory into guidelines for community health promotion.American Journal of Health Promotion. 1996,10:282–298.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. (9).
    Stokols D: Social ecology and behavioral medicine: Implications for training, practice, and policy.Behavioral Medicine. 2000,26:129–138.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. (10).
    Stokols D, Allen J, Bellingham RL: The social ecology of health promotion: Implications for research and practice.American Journal of Health Promotion. 1996,10:247–251.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. (11).
    Godbey GC, Caldwell LL, Floyd M, Payne LL: Contributions of leisure studies and recreation and park management research to the active living agenda.American Journal of Preventive Medicine. 2005,28(Suppl. 2):150–158.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. (12).
    Humpel N, Owen N, Leslie E: Environmental factors associated with adults’ participation in physical activity: A review.American Journal of Preventive Medicine. 2002,22:188–199.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. (13).
    Poverty in Mexico: An Assessment of Trends, Conditions, and Government Strategy (No. 28612-ME). Mexico: The World Bank, 2004.Google Scholar
  14. (14).
    Cohen DA, Scribner RA, Farley TA: A structural model of health behavior: A pragmatic approach to explain and influence health behaviors at the population level.Preventive Medicine. 2000,30:146–154.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. (15).
    Bandura A:Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Approach. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1986.Google Scholar
  16. (16).
    van Lenthe FJ, Brug J, Mackenbach JP: Neighbourhood inequalities in physical inactivity: The role of neighbourhood attractiveness, proximity to local facilities and safety in the Netherlands.Social Science and Medicine. 2005,60: 763–775.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. (17).
    De Bourdeaudhuij I, Sallis JF, Saelens BE: Environmental correlates of physical activity in a sample of Belgian adults.American Journal of Health Promotion. 2003,18:83–92.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. (18).
    McNeill LH, Wyrwich KW, Brownson RC, Clark EM, Kreuter MW: Individual, social environmental, and physical environmental influences on physical activity among black and white adults: A structural equation analysis.Annals of Behavioral Medicine. 2006,31:36–44.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. (19).
    Wilson DK, Kirtland KA, Ainsworth BE, Addy CL: Socioeconomic status and perceptions of access and safety for physical activity.Annals of Behavioral Medicine. 2004,28:20–28.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. (20).
    Ainsworth BE, Wilcox S, Thompson WW, Richter DL, Henderson KA: Personal, social, and physical environmental correlates of physical activity in African American women in South Carolina.American Journal of Preventive Medicine. 2003,25(Suppl. 1):23–29.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. (21).
    Berrigan D, Dodd K, Troiano RP, Reeve BB, Ballard-Barbash R: Physical activity and acculturation among adult Hispanics in the United States.Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport. 2006,77:147–157.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. (22).
    Pate RR, Pratt M, Blair SN, et al.: Physical activity and public health. A recommendation from the centers for disease control and prevention and the American college of sports medicine.Journal of American Medical Association. 1995,273:402–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. (23).
    U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.Physical Activity and Health: A Report of the Surgeon General. Atlanta, GA: National Center of Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, 1996.Google Scholar
  24. (24).
    Pedestrian and Bicycle Information Center: 2/10/2003Walkability checklist. Retrieved March 1, 2007 from Scholar
  25. (25).
    Ayala GX, Elder JP, Campbell NR, et al.: Correlates of body mass index and waist-to-hip ratio among Mexican women in the United States: Implications for intervention development.Womens Health Issues. 2004,14:155–164.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. (26).
    Steiger J: Structural model evaluation and modification: An interval estimation approach.Multivariate Behavioral Research. 1990,25:173–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. (27).
    Tucker LR, Lewis C: The reliability coefficient for maximum likelihood factor analysis.Psychometrika. 1973,38:1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. (28).
    Marsh HW, Balla JR, McDonald RP: Goodness-of-fit indexes in confirmatory factor analysis: The effect of sample size.Psychological Bulletin. 1988,103:391–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. (29).
    McDonald RP, Marsh HW: Choosing a multivariate model: Noncentrality and goodness of fit.Psychological Bulletin. 1990,107:247–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. (30).
    Crespo CJ, Smit E, Andersen RE, Carter-Pokras O, Ainsworth BE: Race/ethnicity, social class and their relation to physical inactivity during leisure time: Results from the third national health and nutrition examination survey, 1988–1994.American Journal of Preventive Medicine. 2000,18:46–53.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. (31).
    Easter MM, Linnan LA, Bentley ME, et al.: “Una mujer trabaja doble aqui”: Vignette-based focus groups on stress and work for Latina blue-collar women in eastern North Carolina.Health Promotion Practice. 2007,8:41–49.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. (32).
    Marquez DX, McAuley E: Gender and acculturation influences on physical activity in Latino adults.Annals of Behavioral Medicine. 2006,31:138–144.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. (33).
    Jacoby E, Bull F, Neiman A: Rapid changes in lifestyle make increased physical activity a priority for the Americas.Revista Panamericana de Salud Publica. 2003,14:223–228.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. (34).
    Juarbe TC, Lipson JG, Turok X: Physical activity beliefs, behaviors, and cardiovascular fitness of Mexican immigrant women.Journal of Transcultural Nursing. 2003,14:108–116.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. (35).
    Chen W: Chinese and American college students’ motives for participation in physical activities.Perceptual and Motor Skills. 1998,87(3 Pt. 2):1463–1470.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. (36).
    Olvera N, Suminski R, Power TG: Intergenerational perceptions of body image in Hispanics: Role of BMI, gender, and acculturation.Obesity Research. 2005,13:1970–1979.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. (37).
    Hall SK, Cousins JH, Power TG: Self-Concept and perceptions of attractiveness and body size among Mexican American mothers and daughters.International Journal of Obesity. 1991,15:567–575.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. (38).
    Ayala GX, Mickens L, Galindo P, Elder JP: Acculturation and body image perception among Latino youth.Ethnicity and Health. 2007,12:21–41.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. (39).
    Dail PW: Immigration and migration in America: Social impact and social response.International Migration. 1988,26:441–452.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. (40).
    Saelens BE, Sallis JF, Black JB, Chen D: Neighborhood-based differences in physical activity: An environment scale evaluation.American Journal of Public Health. 2003,93:1552–1558.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. (41).
    Ross CE, Mirowsky J: Socially-desirable response and acquiescence in a cross-cultural survey of mental health.Journal of Health and Social Behavior. 1984,25:189–197.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. (42).
    Rauh MJ, Hovell MF, Hofstetter CR, Sallis JF, Gleghorn A: Reliability and validity of self-reported physical activity in Latinos.International Journal of Epidemiology. 1992,21:966–971.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. (43).
    Craig CL, Marshall AL, Sjostrom M, et al.: International physical activity questionnaire: 12-country reliability and validity.Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise. 2003,35:1381–1395.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. (44).
    Bollen K:Structural equation models with latent variables. New York: Wiley, 1989.Google Scholar
  45. (45).
    Kahn EB, Ramsey LT, Brownson RC, et al.: The effectiveness of interventions to increase physical activity. A systematic review.American Journal of Preventive Medicine. 2002,22(Suppl.):73–107.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. (46).
    Matsudo SM, Matsudo VR, Araujo TL, et al.: The Agita Sao Paulo program as a model for using physical activity to promote health.Revista Panamericana de Salud Publica. 2003,14:265–272.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. (47).
    Elder JP, Candelaria JI, Woodruff SI, et al.: Results of language for health: Cardiovascular disease nutrition education for Latino English-as-a-second-language students.Health Education and Behavior. 2000,27:50–63.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. (48).
    Pylypa J: Self-medication practices in two California Mexican communities.Journal of Immigrant Health. 2001,3:59–75.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. (49).
    Lara M, Gamboa C, Kahramanian MI, Morales LS, Bautista DE: Acculturation and Latino health in the United States: A review of the literature and its sociopolitical context.Annual Review of Public Health. 2005,26:367–397.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. (50).
    Prevalence of fruit and vegetable consumption and physical activity by race/ethnicity—United States, 2005.Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report. 2007,56:301–304.Google Scholar
  51. (51).
    Leslie E, Coffee N, Frank L, et al.: Walkability of local communities: Using geographic information systems to objectively assess relevant environmental attributes.Health Place. 2005,13:111–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Society of Behavioral Medicine 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Latrice C. Pichon
    • 1
  • Elva M. Arredondo
    • 2
  • Scott Roesch
    • 3
  • James F. Sallis
    • 3
  • Guadalupe X. Ayala
    • 4
  • John P. Elder
    • 4
  1. 1.Joint Doctoral Program in Public HealthSan Diego State University/University of California, San DiegoSan Diego
  2. 2.Center for Behavioral and Community Health StudiesSan Diego State UniversityUSA
  3. 3.Department of PsychologySan Diego State UniversityUSA
  4. 4.Graduate School of Public HealthSan Diego State UniversityUSA

Personalised recommendations