American Journal of Potato Research

, Volume 83, Issue 1, pp 9–19 | Cite as

Defender: A high-yielding, processing potato cultivar with foliar and tuber resistance to late blight

  • R. G. Novy
  • S. L. Love
  • D. L. Corsini
  • J. J. Pavek
  • J. L. Whitworth
  • A. R. Mosley
  • S. R. James
  • D. C. Hane
  • C. C. Shock
  • K. A. Rykbost
  • C. R. Brown
  • R. E. Thornton
  • N. R. Knowles
  • M. J. Pavek
  • N. Olsen
  • D. A. Inglis
Article

Abstract

The potato cultivar Defender is high-yielding, white-skinned, and notable for having foliar and tuber resistance to late blight infection caused byPhytophthora infestans (Mont.) de Bary. It was released in 2004 by the USDA-ARS and the agricultural experiment stations of Idaho, Oregon, and Washington. Defender is suitable for processing into french fries and other frozen potato products directly from the field or from storage. Defender also may be used for fresh markets in regions such as California, where cultivars with long tubers and white skin are traditionally grown. Resistances to late blight and other potato diseases make Defender an ideal candidate for organic potato production. Defender consistently produced greater total and U.S. No. 1 yields than ‘Russet Burbank’ in Idaho trials. In early harvest trials conducted in the western U.S., average total yields of Defender were 17% and 23% greater than yields for ‘Ranger Russet’ and ‘Shepody’, respectively. In full-season trials conducted in the western U.S., Defender averaged 10% and 15% higher yields than Ranger Russet and Russet Burbank, respectively. Specific gravity of Defender is consistently high, with values comparable to those of Ranger Russet; tuber ascorbic acid (Vitamin C) levels are also high. In addition to late blight, Defender also is resistant to tuber early blight (Alternaria solani, (Ellis & G. Martin), L.R. Jones & Grout), potato virus X, and net necrosis; it has moderate levels of resistance to Verticillium wilt (Verticillium dahliae, Kleb), pink rot, foliar early blight, corky ringspot, and Erwinia soft rot. Defender is susceptible to scab (common and powdery) and potato leafroll virus; it has moderate susceptibility to dry rot (Fusarium spp.) and potato virus Y. Susceptibilities to internal necrosis, tuber greening, and blackspot bruise also have been noted, but may be minimized through cultural and harvest practices.

Additional key words

Solanum tuberosum variety breeding vitamin C organic production 

Resumen

Defender es un cultivar de papa de alto rendimiento, piel blanca y excelente por su resistencia al tizón tardío causado porPhytophthora infestans (Mont.) de Bary, tanto a la infección foliar como a la de los tubérculos. Ha sido liberada el 2004 por USDA-ARS y las Estaciones Experimentales Agrícolas de Idaho, Oregon y Washington. Defender es apropiado para el procesamiento de papa frita y otros productos congelados de papa, directamente del campo o del almacén. Defender puede también ser usado en regiones como California, donde se cultivan tradicionalmente variedades de tubérculos alargados y piel blanca. La resistencia al tizón tardío y otras enfermedades de la papa hace de Defender un candidato ideal para la producción orgánica. Defender tuvo consistentemente un mayor rendimiento de tubérculos de grado “US No. 1” que Russet Burbank en pruebas en Idaho. En ensayos de cosecha temprana realizados en el oeste de EUA, el promedio de rendimiento total de Defender fue de 17 y 23% mayor que el de las variedades Ranger Russet y Shepody respectivamente. En ensayos de ciclo completo realizadas en el oeste, Defender tuvo rendimientos 10 y 15% mayores que Ranger Russet y Russet Burbank respectivamente. El peso específico de Defender es consistentemente alto, con valores comparables a los de Ranger Russet y los niveles de ácido ascórbico (Vitamina C) son también altos. Además de ser resistente al tizón tardío, Defender es también resistente al tizón temprano (Alternaria solani (Ellis & G. Martín) L. R. Jones & Grout), Virus X de la papa y necrosis en red. Tiene niveles moderados de resistencia a marchitez por Verticillium (Verticillium dahliae Kleb.), pudrición rosada, tizón foliar temprano, mancha corchosa en anillo y pudrición blanda causada por Erwinia. Defender es susceptible a la sarna (común y polvorienta) y al virus del enrollamiento; tiene moderada susceptibilidad a la pudrición seca (Fusarium spp.) y al virus Y de la papa. También se ha notado susceptibilidad a necrosis interna, verdeamiento del tubérculo y mancha negra, pero estas pueden minimizarse a través de prácticas culturales.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature cited

  1. Brown CR, H Mojtahedi, GS Santo, P Hamm, JJ Pavek, D Corsini, S Love, JM Crosslin, and PE Thomas. 2000. Potato germplasm resistant to corky ringspot disease. Amer J Potato Res 77:23–27.Google Scholar
  2. Corsini D, and JJ Pavek. 1986. Fusarium dry-rot resistant potato germplasm. Am Potato J 63:629–638.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Corsini D, J Pavek, C Brown, D Inglis, M Martin, M Powelson, A Dorrance, and H Lozoya-Saldaña. 1999. Late blight resistant potato germplasm release AWN86514-2. Amer J Potato Res 76:45–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Corsini DL, JJ Pavek, and JR Davis. 1988. Verticillium wilt resistance in non-cultivated tuber-bearingSolanum species. Plant Dis 75:148–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Corsini DL, JJ Pavek, MW Martin, and CR Brown. 1994. Potato germplasm with combined resistance to leafroll virus and viruses X and Y. Am Potato J 71:377–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Hane D, and L Leroux. 2004. 2003 Tri-state potato variety trials. Idaho Agricultural Experiment Station, Progress Report 371. pp 107–113.Google Scholar
  7. Inglis DA, DA Johnson, DE Legard, WE Fry, and PB Hamm. 1996. Relative resistance of potato clones in response to new and old populations ofPhytophthora infestans. Plant Dis 80:575–578.Google Scholar
  8. Johansen RH. 1965. Norgold Russet, a new, early maturing potato variety with good type and scab resistance. Am Potato J 42:201–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Kleinkopf GE, N Olsen, TL Brandt, and MJ Frazier. 2004. Storage requirements for new and “potential release” cultivars for the potato industry.In: Potato Research and Extension Progress Reports, 2004. University of Idaho and the Idaho Potato Commission. pp 31–35.Google Scholar
  10. Kleinkopf GE, N Olsen, TL Brandt, and MJ Frazier. 2005. Storage requirements for new and “potential release” cultivars for the potato industry.In: Potato Research and Extension Progress Reports, 2004. University of Idaho and the Idaho Potato Commission. pp 29–33.Google Scholar
  11. Love, S, RG Novy, DL Corsini, and P Bain. 2003. Potato variety selection and management.In: J Stark and S Love (eds), Potato Production Systems. University of Idaho, Agricultural Communications, Moscow, Idaho. pp. 21–47.Google Scholar
  12. Love SL, T Salaiz, B Shafii, WJ Price, AR Mosley, and RE Thornton. 2004. Stability of expression and concentration of ascorbic acid in North American potato germplasm. HortScience 39(1):156–160.Google Scholar
  13. Mosley A, S Yilma, D Hane, S James, K Rykbost, C Shock, B Charlton, E Eldredge, and L Leroux. 2003. Oregon.In: KG Haynes (ed), National Potato Germplasm Evaluation and Enhancement Report, 2001. pp 369–388.Google Scholar
  14. Pavek JJ, DL Corsini, DR Douglas, RE Ohms, JG Garner, HC McKay, C Stanger, GE Vogt, WC Sparks, R Kunkel, JR Davis, AJ Walz, CE Dallimore, and J Augustin. 1978. Butte: A long russet potato variety with excellent dehydrating quality. Am Potato J 55:685–690.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Porter LD, DA Inglis, and DA Johnson. 2004. Identification and characterization of resistance toPhytophthora infestans in leaves, stems, flowers, and tubers of potato clones in the Pacific Northwest. Plant Dis 88:965–972.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • R. G. Novy
    • 1
  • S. L. Love
    • 2
  • D. L. Corsini
    • 3
  • J. J. Pavek
    • 3
  • J. L. Whitworth
    • 1
  • A. R. Mosley
    • 4
  • S. R. James
    • 5
  • D. C. Hane
    • 6
  • C. C. Shock
    • 7
  • K. A. Rykbost
    • 8
  • C. R. Brown
    • 9
  • R. E. Thornton
    • 10
  • N. R. Knowles
    • 11
  • M. J. Pavek
    • 11
  • N. Olsen
    • 12
  • D. A. Inglis
    • 13
  1. 1.U.S. Dept. of Agriculture (USDA)-Agricultural Research Service (ARS)Aberdeen Research & Extension (R & E) CenterAberdeenUSA
  2. 2.Aberdeen R & E CenterUniversity of IdahoAberdeenUSA
  3. 3.Retired from the USDA-ARSAberdeenUSA
  4. 4.Oregon State UniversityCorvallisUSA
  5. 5.Central Oregon Experiment StationOregon State UniversityRedmondUSA
  6. 6.Hermiston Agricultural Research and Extension CenterOregon State UniversityHermistonUSA
  7. 7.Malheur Experiment StationOregon State UniversityOntarioUSA
  8. 8.Klamath Experiment StationOregon State UniversityKlamath FallsUSA
  9. 9.USDA/ARSProsserUSA
  10. 10.Retired from Washington State UniversityPullmanUSA
  11. 11.Washington State UniversityPullmanUSA
  12. 12.Twin Falls R & E CenterUniversity of IdahoTwin FallsUSA
  13. 13.Mount Vernon R & E UnitWashington State UniversityMount VernonUSA

Personalised recommendations