Economic Botany

, Volume 31, Issue 2, pp 189–203 | Cite as

Plant Hallucinogens and the religion of the Mochica—an ancient Peruvian people

  • Marlene Dobkin de Rios
Article

Conclusion

This article has attempted to reinterpret a now extinct prehistoric people, the Mochica of Peru, in light of our knowledge of contemporary regional hallucinogenic use. An analysis of Mochica pottery motifs suggests the use of a variety of plant hallucinogens which may have permitted access to supernatural realms. I have argued that studies such as this of prehistoric peoples show the central role that hallucinogenic plants have had throughout time and present a new path to the understanding of prehistoric religions.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature Cited

  1. Bennett, W. C, and J. B. Bird. 1946. The archaeology of the Central Andes. In Handbook of South American indians, Vol. 2. The Andean civilizations. Julian Steward, ed. Bulletin 143. Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  2. Benson, E. P. 1972. The Mochica. Praeger, New York.Google Scholar
  3. -. 1974. A man and a feline in Mochica art. Dumbarton Oaks Studies in Pre-Columbian Art and Archaeology No. 14. Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  4. Campbell, J. 1964. Masks of God. Primitive mythologies. Viking Press, New York.Google Scholar
  5. Castaneda, C. 1972. Journey to Ixtlan. The lessons of Don Juan. Simon and Schuster, New York.Google Scholar
  6. Cobo, B. 1956. Obras de Padre Cobo. Tomo 1. Madrid.Google Scholar
  7. Daly, J. W., and B. Witkop. 1971. Chemistry and pharmacology of frog venoms. In Venomous animals and their venoms 2:497–519.Google Scholar
  8. Disselhoff, H. D. 1967. Daily life in ancient Peru. Trans. A. Jaffa. McGraw Hill, New York.Google Scholar
  9. Dobkin de Rios, M. 1968a. Folk curing with a psychedelic cactus in northern Peru. Internat. J. of Social Psychiatry 15:23–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. —. 1968b.Trichocereus pachanoi—a Mescaline Cactus use in folk healing in northern Peru. Econ. Bot. 22:191–194.Google Scholar
  11. — 1971. Peruvian hallucinogenic healing: an overview. Proceedings, 5th World Congress of Psychiatry. Mexico, Excerpta Medica.Google Scholar
  12. -. 1972. Visionary vine: psychedelic healing in the Peruvian Amazon. Chandler, San Francisco.Google Scholar
  13. -. 1973. The non-Western use of hallucinatory agents. In Second Report of the National Commission on Marihuana and Drug Abuse, Appendix, Vol. II. Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  14. —. 1974. The influence of psychotropic flora and fauna on Maya religion. Current Anthropology 15(2)147–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. -. n.d.1 Suggestive hallucinogenic-derived motifs from New World monumental earthworks. Paper read at conference, Nov. 19, 1975, Institute of Religious Studies, Santa Barbara, in honor of Mircea Eliade.Google Scholar
  16. -. n.d.2 The distribution ofTambo structures in the art of nuclear America and its implication for plant hallucinogenic ingestion.Google Scholar
  17. —, and F. Katz. 1975. Some relationships between music and hallucinogenic ritual: the jungle gym in consciousness. Ethos 3:64–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Eliade, M. 1958. Shamanism: archaic techniques of ecstasy. Trans. William Trask. Pantheon, New York.Google Scholar
  19. Erspamer, V. T., et al. 1967. 5-methoxy-and 5-hydroxyindoles in the skin of Bufo Alvarius. Biochemical Pharmacology 14:1149–1164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Friedberg, C. 1959. Rapport sur une Mission au Perou-Description deu Materiel Recueilli, Expose, Sommaire des Recherches Enterprises. Travaux de l’Institut Francais d’Etudes Andines VII:65–94.Google Scholar
  21. — 1960. Utilisation d’un Cactus a Mescaline au Nord du Perou(Trichocereus pachanoi Brit. et Rose). Proceedings 6th International Congress of Anthropological and Ethnological Sciences 2:21–26.Google Scholar
  22. Furst, P. T. 1965. West Mexican tomb sculpture as evidence for shamanism in prehispanic Mesoamerica. Antropológica 15:29–80.Google Scholar
  23. —. 1972. Symbolism and psychopharmacology: the toad as earth mother in Indian America. In Religion en Mesoamerica XII, Mesa Redonda, Sociedad Mexicana de Antropologia, Mexico.Google Scholar
  24. Gillen, J. 1947. The Moche: a Peruvian coastal community. Publications of the Institute of Social Anthropology, Smithsonian Institution III, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  25. Grof, S. 1972. Transpersonal experiences: observations from LSD psychotherapy. J. of Transpersonal Psychology 4:45–80.Google Scholar
  26. Janiger, O. and M. Dobkinde Rios. 1975. Nicotiana an hallucinogen? Econ. Bot. 30:149–151.Google Scholar
  27. Johnston, T. F. 1972. Datura use in a Tsonga Girls’ Puberty School. Econ. Bot. 26:340–351.Google Scholar
  28. Katz, F., and M. Dobkinde Rios. 1971. Hallucinogenic music: an analysis of the role of whistling in Peruvian Ayahuasca healing sessions. J. of American Folklore 84:320–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kutscher, G. 1950. Chimu. Eine Altindianische Hochkulture. Mann.Google Scholar
  30. — 1967. Iconographie studies as an aid in the reconstruction of early Chimu civilization. In Peruvian Archaeology. Selected Readings. John H. Rowe and Dorothy Menzel (eds.). Peak, Palo Alto, Calif.Google Scholar
  31. La Barre, W. 1970. Old and New World narcotics: a statistical question and an ethnological reply. Econ. Bot. 24:73–80.Google Scholar
  32. Lanning, E. 1967. Peru before the Incas. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.Google Scholar
  33. Larco Hoyle, R. 1939. Los Mochicas. 2 Vols. Lima.Google Scholar
  34. — 1969. Checcan. Nagel Press, New York.Google Scholar
  35. Lavallée, D. 1970. Les Representations Animales dans La Ceramique Mochica. Memoires de l’Institut d’Ethnologie IV. Musée de l’Homme,Paris.Google Scholar
  36. Pitt-Rivers, J. 1970. Spiritual power in Central America. The Naguals of Chiapas. In Witchcraft confessions and accusations, Mary Douglas (ed.). Tavistock Publications, New York.Google Scholar
  37. Sawyer, A. R. 1966. Ancient Peruvian ceramics: the Nathan Cummings Collection. Metropolitan Museum of Art. Greenwich, Conn. N.Y. Graphic Society.Google Scholar
  38. Schultes, R. E. 1967. The place of ethnobotany in the ethnopharmacologic search for psychotomimetic drugs. In Ethnopharmacologic search for psychoactive drugs, D. Efron (ed.), Public Health Service Publication 1645. Washington, D.C. Pp. 33–58.Google Scholar
  39. — 1972a. An overview of hallucinogens in the western hemisphere. In Flesh of the Gods, the ritual use of hallucinogens. Peter T. Furst (ed.). Praeger, New York. Pp. 3–54.Google Scholar
  40. —1972b. The ethnotoxicological significance of additives to New World hallucinogens. Plant Science Bulletin 18:34–40.Google Scholar
  41. Sharon, D. 1972a. Eduardo the Healer. Natural History 81:32–47.Google Scholar
  42. — 1972b. The San Pedro cactus in Peruvian folk healing. In Peter Furst, (ed.), Flesh of the Gods: the ritual use of hallucinogens. Praeger, New York.Google Scholar
  43. —, and C. Donan. 1974. Shamanism in Moche iconography. In Ethnoarchaeology. Monograph IV, Institute of Archaeology, Univ. of California, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
  44. Taylor, R. E. 1970. The shaft tombs of Western Mexico: problems in the interpretation of religious function in non-historic archaeological contexts. American Antiquity 35(2)160–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Towle, M. 1961. The ethno-botany of pre-Columbian Peru. Viking Fund Publication in Anthropology 30. New York.Google Scholar
  46. Wallace, A. F. C. 1966. Religion, an anthropological view. Random House, New York.Google Scholar
  47. Wasson, R. G., and V. P. Wasson. 1957. Russia, mushrooms and history. 2 Vols. Pantheon, New York.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The New York Botanical Garden 1977

Authors and Affiliations

  • Marlene Dobkin de Rios
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of AnthropologyCalifornia State UniversityFullerton

Personalised recommendations