Economic Botany

, Volume 54, Issue 3, pp 310–327 | Cite as

Unraveling the commercial market for medicinal plants and plant parts on the witwatersrand, South Africa

  • Vivienne L. Williams
  • Kevin Balkwill
  • Edward T. F. Witkowski
Research

Abstract

To unravel the market for commercial medicinal plants on the Witwatersrand in South Africa, a semiquantitative approach was taken. A stratified random sample of 50 herb-traders was surveyed, and an inventory of all plants and parts sold was compiled. Research participants were questioned on the scarcity and popularity of the plants traded, as well as suppliers and origins. The rarefaction method established that the sample size was adequate. The diversity of the sample was determined using ecological indices of diversity, and found to be comparatively high. In addition, Spearman rank correlations, chi-squared and Fisher’s exact probability tests were used to assess the probability of certain taxa being used. At least 46% of the taxa traded showed a higher than expected probability of being utilized, and taxa tended to be harvested from the largest families proximate to the markets. About 511 species are traded in the region, and there is a low dominance in the use of species. Ethnic and floristic diversity are influential in deciding the trading patterns that have emerged.

Key Words

ethnobotany medicinal plants survey trade diversity biome harvesting South Africa 

Découvrir le marché des plantes médicinales et des parties de plantes dans la région du witwatersrand, en Afrique du sud.

Résumé

Pour découvrir le marché commercial des plantes médicinales et des parties de plantes, nous avons utilisé une approche semiquantitative. Un échantillon pris au hasard, de 50 commerces basé sur une connaissance corporative de ce monde spécifique, et un inventaire de toutes les variétes de plantes offertes à la vente dans ces échopes a été effectuée. Les participants, furent questionnés sur la rareté et la popularité des plantes à l’étalage, ainsi que sur l’origine et les fournisseurs de ces mêmes plantes. La méthode basée sur la raréfaction indiqua que la taille de l’échantillonage était adéquat. La diversité des échantillons fut déterminé en utilisant les indices écologiques, de diversité et se révéla, en comparaison, important. De plus, la corrélation linéaire de Spearman, le test x2, et les tests de probabilité éxacte de Fisher furent utilisés pout évaluer la probabilité de certaine taxa utilisée. Au moins 46% de la taxa vendue, montre une probabilité supérieure à la moyenne d’être utilisée, et la taxa tend a être récoltée parmi les familles de plantes situées dans la vicinité des lieux de vente. 511 espéces sont à la vente dans la région, et il n’y a pas de dominance particulière sur certaines especes. La présence de plusieurs groupes ethniques et la diversité végétale influence les habitudes commerciales qui constituent la base de l’étude.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature Cited

  1. Archer, R. H., and A. E. van Wyk. 1998. A taxonomic revision ofElaeodendron Jacq. (Cassinoideae: Celastraceae) in Africa. South African Journal of Botany 64(2):93–109.Google Scholar
  2. Arnold, T. H., and B. C. de Wet, eds. 1993. Plants of Southern Africa: names and distribution. Memoirs of the Botanical Survey of South Africa No. 62, National Botanical Institute, Pretoria.Google Scholar
  3. Begossi, A. 1996. Use of ecological methods in ethnobotany. Economic Botany 50:280–289.Google Scholar
  4. Bredenkamp, G., and N. van Rooyen. 1996. Rocky Highveld Grassland. Page 39in A. B. Low and A. G. Rebelo, eds., Vegetation of South Africa, Lesotho and Swaziland. Dept Environmental Affairs and Tourism, Pretoria.Google Scholar
  5. Cunningham, A. B. 1988. An investigation of the herbal medicine trade in Natal-Kwazulu. Investigational Report No. 29, Institute of Natural Resources, University of Natal, Pietermaritzburg.Google Scholar
  6. — 1991a. Development of a conservation policy on commercially exploited medicinal plants: a case study from Southern Africa. Pages 337–358in O. Akerele, V. Heywood, and H. Synge, eds., Conservation of medicinal plants. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  7. — 1991b. The herbal medicine trade: resource depletion and environmental management for a “hidden economy”. Pages 196–206in E. Preston-Whyte and C. Rogerson, eds., South Africa’s informal economy. Oxford University Press, Cape Town.Google Scholar
  8. Dauskardt, R. P. A. 1994. The evolution of health systems in a developing world metropolis: urban herbalism on the Witwatersrand. Master of Arts Dissertation, Department of Geography and Environmental Science, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg.Google Scholar
  9. Gibbs-Russell, G. E. 1985. Analysis of the size and composition of the southern African flora. Bothalia 15:613–630.Google Scholar
  10. — 1987. Preliminary floristic analysis of the major biomes of southern Africa. Bothalia 17(2):213–217.Google Scholar
  11. Huntley, B., R. Siegfried, and C. Sunter. 1989. South African environments into the 21st century. Human & Rousseau Tafelberg, Cape Town.Google Scholar
  12. Hutchings, A. 1989. Observations on plant usage in Xhosa and Zulu medicine. Bothalia 19:225–235.Google Scholar
  13. — 1996. Zulu medicinal plants: an inventory. University of Natal Press, Pietermaritzburg.Google Scholar
  14. —,and J. van Staden. 1994. Plants used for stress-related ailments in traditional Zulu, Xhosa and Sotho medicine. Part 1: Plants used for headaches. Journal of Ethnopharmacology 43:89–124.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Krebs, C. J. 1989. Ecological methodology. Harper and Row, New York.Google Scholar
  16. Low, A. B., and A. G. Rebelo, eds. 1996. Vegetation of South Africa, Lesotho and Swaziland. Dept Environmental Affairs and Tourism, Pretoria.Google Scholar
  17. Ludwig, J. A., and J. F. Reynolds. 1988. Statistical ecology—a primer on methods and computing. John Wiley and Sons, Toronto.Google Scholar
  18. Mabogo, D. E. N. 1990. The ethnobotany of the Vhavenda. Master of Science Dissertation, University of Pretoria, Pretoria.Google Scholar
  19. Mander, J., N. Quinn, and M. Mander. 1997. Trade in wildlife medicinals in South Africa. Institute of Natural Resources Investigational Report No. 154. Institute of Natural Resources, Pietermaritzburg.Google Scholar
  20. McKean, S. G. 1993. Important species document: utilised plants. Natal Parks Board Internal Report, Pietermaritzburg. 51 pp.Google Scholar
  21. Netshiungani, E. N., and A. E. van Wyk. 1980. Mutavhasindi—mysterious plant from Venda. Veld and Flora 66(3):87–90.Google Scholar
  22. Peters, C. M. 1996. Beyond nomenclature and use: a review of ecological methods for ethnobotanists. Pages 241–276in Miguel N. Alexiades, ed., Selected guidelines for ethnobotanical research: a field manual. New York Botanical Garden, New York.Google Scholar
  23. Rutherford, M. C., and R. H. Westfall. 1986. Biomes of southern Africa—an objective categorization. Memoirs of the Botanical Survey of South Africa, 54:1–98.Google Scholar
  24. Sheldon, J. W., M. J. Balick, and S. A. Laird. 1997. Medicinal plants: can utilization and conservation coexist? Advances in Economic Botany 12:1–104.Google Scholar
  25. Siegal, S. 1956. Nonparametric statistics for the behavioural sciences. McGraw-Hill, Tokyo.Google Scholar
  26. Williams, V. L., K. Balkwill, and E. T. F. Witkowski. 1997. Muthi traders on the Witwatersrand, South Africa—an urban mosaic. South African Journal of Botany 63(6):378–381.Google Scholar
  27. -,-, and -. n.d. A lexicon of plants traded in the Witwatersrand umuthi shops. Bothalia in press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The New York Botanical Garden Press, Bronx, NY 10458-5126 U.S.A 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • Vivienne L. Williams
    • 1
  • Kevin Balkwill
    • 1
  • Edward T. F. Witkowski
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Animal, Plant and Environmental SciencesUniversity of the WitwatersrandGautengSouth Africa

Personalised recommendations