American Potato Journal

, Volume 22, Issue 10, pp 297–311 | Cite as

Fertilizer placement for potatoes: A comparison of level-band and hi-lo methods

  • J. C. Campbell
  • Arthur Hawkins
  • B. E. Brown
  • J. A. Chucka
Article

Summary

In recent years much interest has been taken in the placement of fertilizers for the potato crop. The results of several years’ field work, 1931–35, showed that of the 6 or 7 methods of placement compared, the most profitable method was the one which placed the fertilizer in a band on each side of the seed piece, two inches therefrom and on a level with or slightly below the lower plane of the seed piece. Accordingly this particular method was officially recommended by the National Joint Committee on Fertilizer Application and it is the one that has been generally adopted by potato growers and machinery manufacturers alike. Since the general adoption of this method, other methods have been suggested for the potato crop. One of them, the so-called Hi-Lo method, is reputed to have an advantage from placing one of the fertilizer bands two to three inches below the seed piece level into presumably more moist soil in order to better maintain its nutrient availability to the potato plants should dry weather prevail. Another suggested change involved placing more of the fertilizer in the lower band than in the upper one, such as the 25–75 per cent fertilizer distribution considered in the, present tests.

Keywords

AMERICAN Potato Journal Seed Piece Potato Crop National Joint Committee Placement Method 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature Cited

  1. 1.
    Martin, Wm. H., and Brown, B. E. 1931. Fertilizer placement studies with the potato. Proc. Potato Association of America. 18:77–114. (A report covering cooperative fertilizer placement work on potatoes. New Jersey Agr. Exp. Sta. and U. S. Department of Agriculture).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Brown, B. E., and Cumings, G. A. 1936. Fertilizer placement for potatoes. Amer. Potato Jour. 13:265–272.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Houghland, G. V. C.,et al. 1931–1936. Reports on potato fertilizer placement. Proc. of the Joint Committee on Fertilizer Application for 1931–1936. Published and distributed by the National Fertilizer Association.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cumings, G. A., Houghland, G. V. C., and Collaborators., 1939. Fertilizer placement for potatoes. U.S.D.A. Tech. Bul., No. 669. (Illus.)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cumings, G. A.,et al. 1938. Methods of applying fertilizer. Recommendation of the National Joint Committee on Fertilizer Application. Published by the National Fertilizer Association.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Smith, Ora. 1942. Fertilizer placement and rate of application, variety, seed spacing and size of seed piece experiment. Proc. 18th Ann. Meeting, National Joint Committee on Fertilizer Application, pp. 147–149.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Smith, Ora, Kelly, W. C., and Hommel., R. F. 1942. Relation of fertilizer placement, rate of application, source of nitrogen and potassium, irrigation and distance of seed spacing to yields of potatoes. Proc. 19th Ann. Meeting, Joint Committee on Fertilizer Application, pp. 149–154.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Smith, Ora. 1944. Potato fertilization and nutrition studies in 1943. Amer. Potato Jour. 21:342–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 1945

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. C. Campbell
    • 1
  • Arthur Hawkins
    • 2
  • B. E. Brown
    • 3
  • J. A. Chucka
    • 4
  1. 1.New Jersey Agricultural Experiment StationNew Brunswick
  2. 2.Bureau of Plant Industry, Soils, and Agricultural Engineering, Agricultural Research AdministrationUnited States Department of AgricultureOrono
  3. 3.Bureau of Plant Industry, Soils, and Agricultural Engineering, Agricultural Research AdministrationUnited States Department of AgricultureBeltsville
  4. 4.Maine Agricultural Experiment StationOrono

Personalised recommendations