Economic Botany

, Volume 47, Issue 3, pp 258–267 | Cite as

Role of non-timber forest products in a subsistence economy: The case of a joint forestry project in India

  • Paul P. Appasamy
Article

Abstract

Non-timber forest products (NTFP) such as fuelwood, fodder, fruit, medicinal plants, and small timber are important to the rural poor in India. The traditional usufruct rights that the poor enjoyed have been gradually eroded by state control. This process has accelerated with increases in the prices of timber and industrial wood products. Non-timber forest products collected by the poor do not enter the system of national accounts, which results in the undervaluation of the forest wealth of the country. According to some estimates, the total demand for these products outstrips the sustainable yield of the forests in India. To ensure the best use of the forests, it is necessary for rural communities to share the responsibility of forest management with the forest departments. A proposed joint forestry project in South India is discussed as a case study of this innovative approach to forest management. Data on the existing patterns of NTFP extraction are presented to gain a better understanding of the role that these products play in the life of the rural poor. Policies from the case study are discussed in the concluding section.

Key Words

non-timber forest products tropical forests India economic valuation 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature Cited

  1. Appasamy, Paul. 1992. Micro-watershed management: case study of a Tamil Nadu village. Pages 222–228in Anil Agarwal, ed., The price of forests. Centre for Science and Environment, New Delhi.Google Scholar
  2. Arnold, J. E. 1990. Social forestry and communal management in India. Social Forestry Network Paper 11b, Overseas Development Institute, London.Google Scholar
  3. Gadgil, M., and R. Guha. 1992. New forest policy for genuine friendship. The Hindu Survey of the Environment 1992. The Hindu, Madras.Google Scholar
  4. Government of India. 1992. Environmental action programs—India. Interim Document. Ministry of Environment and Forests, New Delhi.Google Scholar
  5. Jodha, N. S. 1986. Common property resources and rural poor in dry regions of India. Economic and Political Weekly 21:1160–1181.Google Scholar
  6. Kulkarni, Sharad. 1987. Forest legislation and trib-als. Economic and Political Weekly 22:2143–2148.Google Scholar
  7. Lai, J. B. 1989. Indian forests: myth and reality. Natraj Publishers, Dehra Dun, India.Google Scholar
  8. Malhotra, K. C. 1992. Joint forestry in West Bengal. Paper presented at a seminar on forests for economic development and recreation. Maxmueller Bhavan, Madras.Google Scholar
  9. Nadkarni, M. V., K. N. Ninan, and Syed Ajmal Pasha. 1992. Economic and financial viability of social forestry projects—a study of selected projects in Karnataka. Social Forestry Research Digest 23:40–69.Google Scholar
  10. Neelakantan, K. S. 1991. Survey of fuelwood use in Tamil Nadu. Paper presented at twenty-first interdisciplinary research methodology workshop. Madras Institute of Development Studies, Hyderabad.Google Scholar
  11. Palni Hills Conservation Council. 1991. Kadavak-urichi interface forestry—surveys and analysis. Ko-daikanal, Tamil Nadu, India.Google Scholar
  12. Shepherd, G. 1990. Forestry, social forestry, fuel-wood and the environment: a tour of the horizon. Social Forestry Network Paper 11a, Overseas Development Institute, London.Google Scholar
  13. Swedish International Development Authority. 1989. Social forestry project—Tamil Nadu phase II. Project Appraisal Document. Madras.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The New York Botanical Garden 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • Paul P. Appasamy
    • 1
  1. 1.Madras Institute of Development StudiesIndia

Personalised recommendations