Advertisement

The Botanical Review

, Volume 14, Issue 6, pp 319–358 | Cite as

Fasciation

  • Orland E. White
Article

Keywords

Botanical Review Succulent Plant Ovary Locule Erigeron Canadensis Leafy Gall 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  1. 1.
    Anonymous. Fasciation. Gard. Chron. p. 838. 1869.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Anonymous. A fasciatedTropaeolum. Gard. Chron. III.55: 133–134. 1914.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Anonymous. A growth disorder of strawberries ascribed to nematodes. Jour. Hered.15: 131. 1924.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Anonymous. Fasciation [Editorial]. Gard. Chron.155: 203. 1944.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Anonymous. Fasciation in the roots of orchids. Gard. Chron.1: 703. 1874.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Baker, R. T. andH. G. Smith. The pines of Australia [See illus. p. 333]. New South Wales, Dept. Publ. Instr., Tech. Educ. Ser. 16. 1909.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bauhin, C. Pinax Theatri Botanici. p. 121. 1623.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bausor, S. C. Fasciation and its relation to problems of growth. I. Shape changes in the shoot. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club64: 383–400. 1937.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    —. Fasciation and its relation to problems of growth. II. Changes from the fasciated to the normal state, with a discussion on the nature of the shoot. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club64: 445–475. 1937.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Beaumont, Dr. Branching palms. [Extracted from a letter from F. Scott to the Agri-Horticultural Society of India]. Gard. Chron.1: 116–118. 1874.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Becker, H. F. Xerophyte exhibit of the Brooklyn Botanic Garden at 24th International Flower Show, March 15–20, 1937. Cactus & Succ. Jour.8: 193–195. 1937.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Blank, L. Fasciation des rameaux d’unSambucus. Ann. Soc. Bot. Lyon. p. 5. 1902.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Blaringhem, L. Anomalies héréditaires provoquées par les traumatismes. Compt. Rend. Acad. Sci., Paris140: 378. 1905.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    — A propos de l’hérédité des fascies deCapsella viguieri. Compt. Rend. Acad. Sci., Paris169: 298–300. 1919.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    — A propos de l’hérédité des fascics deCapsella viguieri. Compt. Rend. Acad. Sci., Paris170: 677–679. 1920.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    — Sur une fascie dePetasites officiralis. Moench et la sexualité des fleurons des capitules anormaux. Rev. Path. Vég. & Ent. Agr.12: 131–136. 1925.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Blodgett, F. H. Fasciation in field peas. Pl. World8: 170–177. 1905.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Boehmer. De plantis fasciatus. 1752.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Bowden, W. M. [Personal communications, 1943–46.]Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Brannon, M. A. Fasciation. Bot. Gaz.58: 518–526. 1914.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Bréthes, J. Cuatro casos de teratológia botánica. Physis (Rev. Soc. Argentina Cien. Nat.8: 588–590). 1927.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Brévière, M. Extrait d’une lettre de M. Brévière, de Saint-Saulge. Bull. Soc. Bot. France28: 5. 1881.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Brown, N. A. Sweet pea fasciation, a form of crown gall. Phytopath.17: 29–30. 1927.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Buchenau, F. Verdoppelung der Spreite bei einem Tabaksblatte. Abh. Naturw. Ver. Bremen7: 443–445. 1883.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Burkill, J. H. Fertility of branched coconut palms. Gard. Bull. (Straits’ Settlement)3: 1–2. 1924.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Capinpin, J. M. A case of teratological twinning in banana. Philipp. Agr.15: 167. 1926.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Choquet, A. Les fasciations végétales. Bull. Mens. Soc. Nat. Hort. France6: 42–43. 1939.Google Scholar
  28. 27a.
    Clausen, Roy E. [Personal correspondence].Google Scholar
  29. 28.
    Clos, D. Essai de tératologie taxinomique. 1–80. 1871.Google Scholar
  30. 29.
    Cobbold, A. The grafting of cacti. Gard. Chron.90: 108. 1931.Google Scholar
  31. 30.
    Collins, G. N. Structure of the maize ear as indicated inZea-Euchlaena hybrids. Jour. Agr. Res.17: 127–135. 1919.Google Scholar
  32. 31.
    Compton, R. H. The anatomy of the Mummy pea. New Phyt.10: 249–255. 1911.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 32.
    Conard, H. S. Fasciation in the sweet potato. Univ. Penn., Bot. Lab., Contr.2: 205. 1901.Google Scholar
  34. 33.
    Cook, M. T. Teratologia de la piña. Primer Informe Anual de la Estacion Central Agrónomica de Cuba. Lam. 43-46: 244–247. 1906.Google Scholar
  35. 34.
    Costerus, J. C. andJ. J. Smith, Jr. Studies in tropical teratology. Ann. Jard. Bot.13: 97–118. 1896.Google Scholar
  36. 35.
    —. Studies in tropical teratology. Ann. Buitenzorg II.9: 98–116. 1911.Google Scholar
  37. 36.
    Crane, M. B. Heredity of types of inflorescence and fruits in tomato. Jour. Genet.5: 1–11. 1915.Google Scholar
  38. 37.
    Crescini, F. Sulla fasciazione delia canapa (Cannabis sativa L.). Arch. Bot. Sist. Fiteogeogr. e. Genet.10: 387–389. 1934.Google Scholar
  39. 38.
    Cutler, H. C. Races of maize in South America. Harvard Univ., Bot. Mus. Leaf.12: 257–291. 1946.Google Scholar
  40. 39.
    Cutting, E. M. Observations on variations in the flowers ofStachys sylvatica L. Ann. Bot.35: 409–426. 1921.Google Scholar
  41. 40.
    Dammer, U. Fasciation in roots ofPothos aurea. Gard. Chron.26: 724. 1886.Google Scholar
  42. 41.
    Daniel, L. Études expérimentales d’arboriculture. Jardin18: 268–270, 276–278. 1904.Google Scholar
  43. 42.
    Darrow, G. M. andE. B. Morrow. Breeding new strawberry varieties. N. C. Agr. Exp. Sta., Bull. 320. 1939.Google Scholar
  44. 43.
    Davies, P. A. andE. Bennett. Abnormal branching inAilanthus. Jour. Hered.20: 348–349. 1929.Google Scholar
  45. 44.
    DeCandolle, A. P. Organographie végétale. Vol.2: 195. 1827.Google Scholar
  46. 45.
    DeCandolle, C. Fasciation chez un sapin. Arch. Sci. Phys. & Nat.21: 95. 1889.Google Scholar
  47. 46.
    Demoulin, G. Fleur monstrueuse duCereus peruvianus var.monstrosus Otto. Belgique Horticole. p. 232. 1874.Google Scholar
  48. 47.
    DeToni, C. Letture contributo alla teratologia del generaChrysanthemum L. Atti Royal Accad. Sci. Torino54: 254–257. 1918–1919.Google Scholar
  49. 48.
    DeVries, H. Over de erfelijkheid der fasciatiën. Bot. Jaarb.6: 72–118. 1894.Google Scholar
  50. 49.
    — On biastrepsis in relation to cultivation. Ann. Bot.8: 396. 1899.Google Scholar
  51. 50.
    — Sur la culture des monstrosités. Compt. Rend. Acad. Sci., Paris128: 125. 1899.Google Scholar
  52. 51.
    — Über die Abhängigkeit der Fasciation vom Alter bei zweijähriger Pflanzen. Bot. Centralblatt.77: 289. 1899.Google Scholar
  53. 52.
    — Sur la culture des fasciations des espèces annuelles et bisannuelles. Rev. Gén. Bot.11: 136–151. 1899.Google Scholar
  54. 53.
    -DeVries, H. Die Mutationstheorie. Vol.2. 1901–1903.Google Scholar
  55. 54.
    -. Species and varieties, their origin by mutation. 1906.Google Scholar
  56. 55.
    -. The mutation theory.2 Vols. 1909–1910.Google Scholar
  57. 56.
    Duarte, D’Oliveira, J. Sur la transmission de la fasciation et de la dichotomie à la suite de la greffe de deux vignes Portugueses. Compt. Rend. Acad. Sci., Paris170: 615–616. 1920.Google Scholar
  58. 57.
    Emerson, R. A. Inheritance of certain “abnormalities” in maize. Am. Breed. Assoc., Rept.8: 385–399. 1912.Google Scholar
  59. 58.
    Engler, A. Loranthaceae. Die näturlichen Pflanzenfamilien. III. Abt.1: 156–198. Fig. 107B. 1894.Google Scholar
  60. 59.
    Ernst, A. Botanische Notizen aus Venezuela. Bot. Centrabl.1: 574. 1880.Google Scholar
  61. 60.
    Fermond, C. Essai de phytomorphieI. pp. 299–301. 1864.Google Scholar
  62. 61.
    Figini, G. P. Fasciazione, nutrizione, peloria. Osservazioni culturali sul’Antirrhinum majus L. Soc. Nat. & Mat. Modena. pp. 25–46. 1925.Google Scholar
  63. 62.
    — L’ereditarietà della fasciazione nell’Antirrhinum majus L. Nuovo Gior. Bot. Ital.33: 65–87. 1926.Google Scholar
  64. 63.
    Flintoff, R. J. Fasciation in black currants (Ribes nigrum L.). Northw. Nat.9: 279–280. 1934.Google Scholar
  65. 64.
    Fobe, F. Ueber die sogenannten Hahnenkammformen bei den Kakteen. Monatschr. Kakteenkunde16: 87. 1906.Google Scholar
  66. 65.
    Fowler, M. E. Fasciation ofBetula pendula dalecarlica. Phytopath.26: 390–392. 1936.Google Scholar
  67. 66.
    Fremy, P. Notes de tératologie végétale. Bull. Soc. Linn. Normandie VII,9: 73–74. 1926 (1927).Google Scholar
  68. 67.
    Frimmel, F. Über die Vererbung der Fruchtgrösse des Tomaten. Zeits. Pflanzenzucht8: 457–462. 1922.Google Scholar
  69. 68.
    Fuentes, M., F. Teratologia vegetal: algunos ejemplares teratologicos de plantas conservados en el museo nacional de Santiago de Chile. Rev. Chil. Hist. Nat.28: 58–66. 1924.Google Scholar
  70. 69.
    Garcia Lopez, A. Algunos casos teratologicos en la vid. Bol. Est. Pat. Veg. (Madrid)1: 99–100. 1926.Google Scholar
  71. 70.
    Georgescu, C. C. Die experimentelle Erzielung von verbänderten Achselsprosser bei den forstlichen Keimlingen. Forstwiss. Centralbl.47: 757–764. 1925.Google Scholar
  72. 71.
    — Beiträge zur Kenntnis der Verbänderung und einiger verwandter teratologischer Erscheinungen. Bot. Abhandl. Heft11: 7–120. 1927.Google Scholar
  73. 72.
    Gerarde, J. The herball or generall historie of plantes. pp. 1220–1221. 1633. E. ed. 1597.Google Scholar
  74. 73.
    Gerbault, E. L. Fasciation et pélorisation partielle d’unDelphinium vivace. Bull. Soc. Linn. Normandie4: 133–141. 1921.Google Scholar
  75. 74.
    Godron, A. Mélanges de tératologie végétale. Soc. Nat. Sci. Cherbourg Mem.16: 81–127. 1871–72.Google Scholar
  76. 75.
    Goebel, K. Organography of plants. 2 Vols. 1900–1905.Google Scholar
  77. 76.
    Groth, B. H. A. Report of progress. N. J. Agr. Exp. Sta., Rep. pp. 386–388. 1911.Google Scholar
  78. 77.
    Györffy, I. Fasciation der männilichen Blütenschaftträger vonRadiana rumaenica Schniffner. Magyar Bot. Lapok.25: 48–49. 1926 (1927).Google Scholar
  79. 78.
    Haage andSchmidt. Haupt-Verzeichnis ü. Samen u. Pflanzen. pp. 1–284. 1912.Google Scholar
  80. 79.
    Hagiwara, T. Genetic studies of the fasciation in morning glories. Bot. Mag. (Tokyo)40: 281–294. 1926.Google Scholar
  81. 80.
    Hamilton, A. A. Root fasciation in cycads. Australian Nat.4: 134. 1920.Google Scholar
  82. 81.
    Harris, J. A. New fasciations. Torreya5: 157–160. 1905.Google Scholar
  83. 82.
    Harshberger, J. W. Cockscomb fasciation of pineapples. Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci. Philadelphia. pp. 609–611. 1901.Google Scholar
  84. 83.
    Hester, J. Carnegia gigantea cristata. Desert plant life12: 85–86, 109. 1940.Google Scholar
  85. 84.
    Heusser, C. Drie korte mededeelingen betreffendeHevea brasiliensis. Arch. Rubbercultuur10: 355–363. 1926.Google Scholar
  86. 85.
    Hinks, W. On the nature of fasciated stems. Proc. Linn. Soc.2: 217. 1853.Google Scholar
  87. 86.
    Hitchin, C. E. Fasciation. Gard. Chron.116: 71. 1944.Google Scholar
  88. 87.
    Horner, A. Fasciated fruit. Proc. Pineapple Men’s Conf. 1927. Vol.6: 109–112. 1927.Google Scholar
  89. 88.
    Huntley, H. Fasciation in lilies. Gard. Chron.32: 85–86. 1902.Google Scholar
  90. 89.
    Hus, H. Fasciation inOxalis crenata and experimental production of fasciations. Mo. Bot. Gard., Rep.17: 147–152. 1906.Google Scholar
  91. 90.
    — Fasciations of known causation. Am. Nat.42: 81–97. 1908.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. 91.
    —, andA. W. Murdock. Inheritance of fasciation inZea mays L. Pl. World14: 88–96. 1911.Google Scholar
  93. 92.
    Imai, Y. Is fasciated a frequently mutating character? Bot. Gaz.90: 116–118. 1930.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. 93.
    — Genetic studies in morning glories. XVIII. On fasciation. Bot. Mag. (Tokyo)40: 655–657. 1926.Google Scholar
  95. 94.
    — andBenso Kanna. Some remarks on fasciation ofPharbitis nil. Jour. Coll. Agr. Imp. Univ. Tokyo12: 409–419. 1934.Google Scholar
  96. 95.
    Irvine, V. C. X-radiation and growth substances as affecting growth primordial tissues. Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol. & Med.43: 453–455. 1940.Google Scholar
  97. 96.
    Jaeger, G. F. Ueber die Missbildungen der Gewächse. 1814.Google Scholar
  98. 97.
    Johansen, D. A. Studies on the morphology of the Onagraceae. II. Embryonal manifestations of fasciation inClarkia elegans. Bot. Gaz.90: 75–91. 1930.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. 98.
    Johnson, E. L. Effects of X-ray upon growth, development and oxidizing enzymes ofHelianthus annuus. Bot. Gaz.82: 373–402. 1926.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. 99.
    Jones, D. F. The similarity between fasciation in plants and tumors in animals and their genetic basis. Science81: 75–76. 1935.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. 100.
    Kajanus, B. Ueber einige vegetative Anomalien beiTrifolium pratense L. Zeits. Abst. Ver.9: 111–133. 1913.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. 101.
    Kanna, B. Genetic studies inImpatiens balsamina L. Jour. Coll. Agr. Imp. Univ. Tokyo12: 421–477. 1934.Google Scholar
  103. 102.
    Keese, J. The floral keepsake. pp. 69–70. 18-.Google Scholar
  104. 103.
    Kelly, J. P. Fasciation inPhlox drummondii. Jour. Hered.18: 323–327. 1927.Google Scholar
  105. 104.
    Kidd, H. W. On fasciation. Sci. Gos.19: 196–198. 1883.Google Scholar
  106. 105.
    Kienholz, R. Fasciation in red pine. Bot. Gaz.94: 404–410. 1932.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. 106.
    Kiesselbach, T. A. Fasciated kernels, reversed kernels, and related abnormalities in maize. Am. Jour. Bot.13: 35–39. 1926.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  108. 107.
    King, H. G. Fasciated vegetable marrow. Gard. Chron.64: 147. 1918.Google Scholar
  109. 108.
    Kirsch, A. M. Teratological notes. I. An abnormal specimen ofTaraxacum. Mid. Nat.1: 24–25. 1909.Google Scholar
  110. 109.
    Klebs, G. Ueber künstliche Metamorphosen. Abh. Naturf. Ges. Halle25: 134. 1903–06.Google Scholar
  111. 110.
    Klecka, A. O fasciacích. Ochrana Rostl.6: 58–63. 1926.Google Scholar
  112. 111.
    Knight, T. A. On cultivation of cockscomb. Trans. Hort. Soc. London4: 321. 1822.Google Scholar
  113. 112.
    Knox, A. A. Fasciations inDrosera, Ibervillea andCecropia. Torreya7: 102–103. 1907.Google Scholar
  114. 113.
    -. Induction, development and heritability of fasciations. Carnegie Inst. Pub. 98. 1908.Google Scholar
  115. 114.
    Lacey, M. S. Studies in bacteriosis. XXII. 1. The isolation of a bacterium associated with fasciation of sweet peas, “cauliflower” strawberry plants and “leafy gall” of various plants. Ann. Appl. Biol. 23: 302–310. 1936.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  116. 115.
    — Further studies on a bacterium causing fasciation of sweet peas. Ann. Appl. Biol.23: 743–751. 1936.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  117. 116.
    Lamarliere, L. G. de. Sur la production expérimentale des tiges et d’inflorescences fasciées. Compt. Rend. Acad. Sci., Paris128: 1601. 1899.Google Scholar
  118. 117.
    Lanzoni, F. Un caso di fasciazione totale diDigitalis purpurea L. Arch. Bot. Sist. Fitogeog. e Gen.4: 202–205. 1928.Google Scholar
  119. 118.
    Lehle. Verbänderung bei der Wegwarte (Cichorium intybus). Aus Heimat42: 375. 1929.Google Scholar
  120. 119.
    Lindley, J. Celosia coccinea. Bot. Reg.22: 1834. 1836.Google Scholar
  121. 120.
    Lindstrom, E. W. The inheritance of ovate and related shapes of tomato fruits. Jour. Agr. Res.34: 961–985. 1927.Google Scholar
  122. 121.
    -Lindstrom, E. W.. Linkage of size, shape and color genes inLycopersicon. Zeits. Ind. Abst. Ver. Suppl.2: 1031–1057. 1927.Google Scholar
  123. 122.
    Linnaeus, C. Philosophia botanica. p. 216. 1751.Google Scholar
  124. 123.
    Lobel, M. de. Plantarum de Lobel. p. 126. 1576.Google Scholar
  125. 124.
    Lock, R. H. Present state of knowledge of heredity inPisum. Ann. Royal Bot. Gard., Peradeniya4: 92–111. 1908.Google Scholar
  126. 125.
    Lohrmann. Verbänderungen anPinus silvestris L. Mitt. Deut. Dend. Ges.1927: 65–66. 1927.Google Scholar
  127. 126.
    LoPriore, G. Sulla ereditarieta della fasciazione nelle spighe del mais. Staz. Sper. Agr. Ital.51: 415–430. 1918.Google Scholar
  128. 127.
    Louis-Marie, R. P. Notes sur trois cas de fasciation. Rev. Oka: Agron., Méd., Vét.14: 155–162. 1940.Google Scholar
  129. 128.
    Luckwill, L. C. The evolution of the cultivated tomato. Jour. Royal Hort. Soc.68: 19–25. 1943.Google Scholar
  130. 129.
    Lutz, L. Sur un cas déformation tératologique du thalle chez l’Asco-phyllum nodosum. Bull. Soc. Bot. France56: 606. 1909.Google Scholar
  131. 130.
    MacArthur, J. W. Linkage groups in the tomato. Jour. Genet.29: 123–133. 1934.Google Scholar
  132. 131.
    —. Linkage studies with the tomato. II. Three linkage groups. Genetics13: 410–420. 1928.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  133. 132.
    Mannini, P. Sopra un caso di fasciazione in un ramo di gelso. Ann. Royal Staz. Bacol. Sper. Padova49: 521–532. 1937 (1938).Google Scholar
  134. 133.
    Martin-Sans, E. Quelques anomalies végétales. Bull. Soc. Hist. Nat. Toulouse56: 406–410. 1927.Google Scholar
  135. 134.
    —. Fascies chez leFraxinus excelsior L. Quelques remarques sur la fasciation. Bull. Soc. Bot. France76: 740–757. 1929.Google Scholar
  136. 135.
    —. Quelques anomalies végétales. Bull. Soc. Hist. Nat. Toulouse58: 569–572. 1929.Google Scholar
  137. 136.
    Masters, M. T. Vegetable teratology. 1869.Google Scholar
  138. 137.
    Matthews, J. R. Fasciation freaks. Garden90: 121–122. 1926.Google Scholar
  139. 138.
    Mendel, G. J. Versuche über Pflanzen-Hybriden. Verh. Naturf. Ver. Brünn4 (Abh.): 3–47. 1866.Google Scholar
  140. 139.
    Miln, T. E. Fasciation not inherent. Gard. Chron.64: 210. 1918.Google Scholar
  141. 140.
    Moebius, M. Eine Pflanzenmissbildung und Goethes Beobachtungen darüber. Natur. Mus. (Frankfurt a M.)57: 241–247. 1927.Google Scholar
  142. 141.
    Molliard, M. Hypertrophie pathologique des cellules végétales. Rev. Gén. Bot.9: 33. 1897.Google Scholar
  143. 142.
    —. Cas de virescence et de fasciation d’origine parasitaire. Rev. Gén. Bot. 12: 323–327. 1900.Google Scholar
  144. 143.
    Molyneux, E. Fasciation not inherent. Gard. Chron.64: 210. 1918.Google Scholar
  145. 144.
    Moore, T. Celosia cristata. Floral mag.1: pls.47, 49. 1861.Google Scholar
  146. 145.
    Moquin-Tandon, A. Eléménts de tératologie végétale. 1841.Google Scholar
  147. 146.
    Muncie, J. H. andM. K. Patel. Fasciations of sweet peas. Am. Jour. Bot.17: 218–230. 1930.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  148. 147.
    Munerati, O. andT. Costa. Di alcune forme teratologiche dellaBeta vulgaris L. e loro eredita. Zeits. Ind. Abs. Ver.66: 463–489. 1934.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  149. 148.
    Munting, A. Waare Oeffininge der Planten. 1672.Google Scholar
  150. 149.
    Nestler, A. Untersuchungen über Fasciationen. Oest. Bot. Zeits.44: 343. 1894.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  151. 150.
    — Über Ringfasciation. Sitzber. Akad. Wiss. Wien Math.- Nat. Cl.103: 153. 1894.Google Scholar
  152. 151.
    Nicolas, G. Notes phytotératologiques. Bull. Soc. Hist. Nat. Toulouse50: 116–119. 1922.Google Scholar
  153. 152.
    —. Notes phytotératologiques. Bull. Soc. Hist. Nat. Toulouse57: 86–90. 1928.Google Scholar
  154. 153.
    Nohara, S. Genetical studies onSesamum indicum L. Jour. Coll. Agr. Imp. Univ. Tokyo12: 227–386. 1933.Google Scholar
  155. 154.
    Owen, Miss. Fasciated medlars. Gard. Chron.23: 112–113. 1885.Google Scholar
  156. 155.
    Passerini, N. Sul significato morfologico e fisiologico della “palla” del cavolfiore e su di un caso di fasciazione della medesima. Bull. Royal 1st Supp. Agrar. Pisa7: 159–171. 1931.Google Scholar
  157. 156.
    Peattie, D. C. Fasciation in plants. Am. Bot.33: 60–62. 1927.Google Scholar
  158. 157.
    Penzig, O. Pflanzen Teratologie. Vol. 2. 1890–94.Google Scholar
  159. 158.
    Petch, T. The physiology and diseases ofHevea brasiliensis. 1911.Google Scholar
  160. 159.
    Peyritsch, J. Ueber künstliche Erzeugung von gefüllten Blüthen und anderen Bildungsabweichungen. Sitzber. Akad. Wiss. Wien., Math.- Nat. Cl.97: 597. 1888.Google Scholar
  161. 160.
    Pittier, H. Manual de las plantes usuales de Venezuela. 1926.Google Scholar
  162. 161.
    Powers, L. Formulas for determining certain theoretical effects of certain genetic factors upon inheritance of quantitative characters with special reference to aLycopersicon hybrid. Jour. Agr. Res.59: 555–557. 1939.Google Scholar
  163. 162.
    — Studies on the nature of the interactions of the genes differentiating quantitative characters in a cross betweenLycopersicon esculentum andL. pimpinellifolium. Jour. Genet.39: 139–170. 1939.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  164. 163.
    Puglisi, M. Contribute alla teratologia vegetale. I. Fasciazione diVescaria reticula, diBunias Orientalis. Ann. di Bot.4: 367. 1906.Google Scholar
  165. 164.
    Pulney-Andy, S. Branching palms. Trans. Linn. Soc.26: 661. 1869.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  166. 165.
    Reed, T. On morphology and physiology of fasciated seedlings. Ann. Bot.26: 388–402. 1912.Google Scholar
  167. 166.
    Reichardt, H. W. Ueber eine Missbildung des Schaftes vonTaraxacum officinale Wigg. Verh. Kais.-Kön. Zool.-Bot. Ges. Wien13: 1009. 1863.Google Scholar
  168. 167.
    Renaudet, G. Contribution à l’étude de la tératologie végétale de la fasciation herbacée et ligneuse. Thèse, Poitiers. 1901.Google Scholar
  169. 168.
    Richter, P. Ueber Missbildung der Blüthenkoffe der Sonnenblume. Ber. Deut. Bot. Ges.8: 231. 1890.Google Scholar
  170. 169.
    Rumphius, G. E. Herbarium Amboinense. Vol.5: 238–284. 1750.Google Scholar
  171. 170.
    Russell, W. Cas de fasciation chezRanunculus bulbosus. Feuille Nat.45: 68–70. 1924.Google Scholar
  172. 171.
    Sabnis, T. S. Notes on Indian plant teratology. Jour. Indian Bot. Soc.10: 21–26. 1931.Google Scholar
  173. 172.
    Sachs, J. Gesammelte Abhandlungen über Pflanzen-Physiologie. Vol.1: 597. 1892.Google Scholar
  174. 173.
    —. Physiologische Versuche über die Keimung der Schminkbohne (Phaseolus multiflorus). Sitzungsber. Akad. Wiss. Wien37: 57. 1859.Google Scholar
  175. 174.
    Savelli, R. Su alcune fasciazione anulari. Nuovo Gior. Bot. Ital.34: 204–213. 1927.Google Scholar
  176. 175.
    Schneck, J. Fasciation in cherry. Pl. World8: 35–37. 1905.Google Scholar
  177. 176.
    Schoute, J. C. Fasciation and dichotomy. Rec. Trav. Bot. Nèerl.33: 649–669. 1936. [Rev. in Jour. Royal Hort. Soc.62: 276. 1937].Google Scholar
  178. 177.
    Shibuya, T. The occurrence of fasciation in flax stem in relation to the environment. Jour. Soc. Trop. Agr. (Taiwan)11: 227–236. 1939.Google Scholar
  179. 178.
    Sibilia, C. Una fascizione di Rosa. Boll. Royal Staz. Pat. Veg. (Florence)11: 293–305. 1931.Google Scholar
  180. 179.
    Singh, T. C. N. A note on fasciation of flowers inQuisqualis indica L. Jour. Indian Bot. Soc.5: 16. 1926.Google Scholar
  181. 180.
    —. Notes on the teratology of certain Indian plants. V, VI. Jour. Indian Bot. Soc.9: 248–252. 1930;10: 134–138. 1931.Google Scholar
  182. 181.
    Smith, E. F. Fasciation ofDahlia. Jour. Hered.17: 112. 1926.Google Scholar
  183. 182.
    Steiner, G. Tylenchus dipsaci, the bulb or stem nema parasitizing strawberry plants in North Carolina. U. S. Dept. Agr., Bur. Pl. Ind., Rep.15: 43. 1931.Google Scholar
  184. 183.
    Stewart, G. Abnormalities in inbred alfalfa and sugar beets. Jour. Hered.25: 449. 1934.Google Scholar
  185. 184.
    Stomps, T. J. Vergrünung als parallele Mutation. Rec. Trav. Bot. Neèrl.15: 17–26. 1919.Google Scholar
  186. 185.
    Stout, A. B. Duplication and cohesion in the main axis inCichorium intybus. Mem. Brooklyn Bot. Gard.1: 480–485. 1918.Google Scholar
  187. 186.
    Tadulingam, C. et al. Note on some examples of plant teratology from South India. Jour. Indian Bot. Soc.4: 225–26. 1925.Google Scholar
  188. 187.
    Takagi, F. On the inheritance of some characters inGlycine soja Bentham (Soybean). Tohoku Imp. Univ., Sci. Rep. IV. (Biol.)4: 577–589. 1929.Google Scholar
  189. 188.
    Trinchieri, G. Fasciation et “Pseudo-fasciation.” Atti Acad. Gioenia Sci. Nat. Catania 1907. [Trans. G. Renaudet. Soc. Nat. Luxemb. pp. 1–15. 1910].Google Scholar
  190. 189.
    Vasey, G. Fasciation inSophora secundiflora Lag. Bot. Gaz.12: 160. 1887.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  191. 190.
    Verplancke, G. Betteraves fasciculeés. Publ. Inst. Belge Améliorat. Betterave2: 29–30. 1934.Google Scholar
  192. 191.
    Vilmorin, Blumen-gartnerei. pp. 271. 1873.Google Scholar
  193. 192.
    Warren, P. A. Genetic studies inLycopersicum. I. The heredity of fruit shape in the garden tomato. Papers Mich. Acad. Sci.4: 357–394. 1924.Google Scholar
  194. 193.
    Weatherwax, P. A remarkable case of fasciation inOenothera biennis. Proc. Ind. Acad. Sci. 1916: 363–364. 1916.Google Scholar
  195. 194.
    — The ancestry of maize-a reply to criticism. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club46: 275–278. 1919.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  196. 195.
    White, O. E. The bearing of teratological development inNicotiana on theories of heredity. Am. Nat.47: 206–228. 1913.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  197. 196.
    -. The history ofNicotiana. II. An account of the heredity and environment of a family of tobacco plants. Brooklyn Bot. Gard., Leaf. II. No. 12. 1914.Google Scholar
  198. 197.
    —. Studies of teratological phenomena in their relation to evolution and the problems of heredity. II. The nature, causes, distribution, and inheritance of fasciation with special reference to its occurrence inNicotiana. Zeits. Ind. Abst. Ver.16: 49–185; Brooklyn Bot. Gard., Contr. 11. 1916.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  199. 198.
    —. The biology of fasciation and its relation to abnormal growth. [Abstract]. Third Int. Cancer Congr., Atlantic City. p. 79. 1939.Google Scholar
  200. 199.
    —. The biology of fasciation and its relation to abnormal growth. Jour. Hered.36: 11–22. 1945.Google Scholar
  201. 200.
    —. The germination of peas in Florida and King Tut’s Tomb. Turtox News24: 6–8. 1946.Google Scholar
  202. 201.
    Williams, B. S. [Fasciation in Maize]. Pathfinder. October 30, p. 34, 1926.Google Scholar
  203. 202.
    Wolfe, T. K. Fasciation in maize kernels. Am. Nat.50: 306–309. 1916.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  204. 203.
    Wolthuys, J. J. V. Het raadsel van het ontstaan van monstruositeiten en cristaties bij de succulenten. The enigma of the origin of monstruosity and cristation in succulent plants. [Transl. by J. A. Schuurman]. Joh. Enschede en zonen grafische Inrichting n. v., Haarlem (Holland). pp.73. 1938.Google Scholar
  205. 204.
    Worsdell, W. C. Fasciation-its meaning and origin. New Phyt.4: 55–74. 1905.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  206. 205.
    Yamaguchi, Y. Fasciation inPharbitis hederacea. Jour. Col. Sci. Imp. Univ. Tokyo39: 56. 1916.Google Scholar
  207. 206.
    — Notiz über die Vererbung der Fasziation beiPharbitis Nil. Bot. Mag. (Tokyo)40: 535–537. 1926.Google Scholar
  208. 207.
    Yamasaki, Y. Studies on the experimental production of fasciation in buckwheat by the treatment of seeds with heteroauxin solutions. Jap. Jour. Genet.16: 171–175. 1940.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  209. 208.
    Yeager, A. F. Studies on the inheritance and development of fruit size and shape in the tomato. Jour. Agr. Res. 55: 141–152. 1937.Google Scholar
  210. 209.
    Zielinski, Q. Fasciation in horticultural plants with special reference to the tomato. Proc. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci.46: 263–268. 1945.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The New York Botanical Garden 1948

Authors and Affiliations

  • Orland E. White
    • 1
  1. 1.The Blandy Experimental Farm and Miller School of BiologyUniversity of VirginiaUSA

Personalised recommendations