The Botanical Review

, Volume 13, Issue 9, pp 479–541 | Cite as

The endosperm in seed development

  • R. A. Brink
  • D. C. Cooper


Pollen Tube Botanical Review Seed Development Female Gametophyte Endosperm Development 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature Cited

  1. 1.
    Afzelius, K. Apomixis in der Gattung Arnica. Svensk Bot. Tid.30: 572–579. 1936.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Akerberc, E. Further studies of the embryo- and endosperm development inPoo pratensis. Hereditas29: 199–201. 1943.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Alderman, W. H. Experimental work on self-sterility in the apple. Proc. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci.: 94–101. 1917.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Andrew, R. al. Some effects of the waxy and sugary genes on endosperm development in maize. Jour. Agr. Res.69: 355–371. 1944.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Armstrong, J. M. Hybridization ofTriticum andAgropyron. I. Crossing results and description of first generation hybrids. Canad. Jour. Res., C,14: 190–202. 1936.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    — Investigations inTriticum-Agropyron hybridization. Emp. Jour. Exp. Agr.13: 41–53. 1945.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Asplund, E. Studien über die Entwicklungsgeschichte der Blüten einiger Valerianaceen. Kung. Svenska Vet. Akad. Handl.61(3). 1920.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Avery, G. S., al. Auxin content of maize kernels during ontogeny, from plants of varying heterotic vigor. Am. Jour. Bot.29: 765–772. 1942.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Beasley, J. O. Hybridization of American 26-chromosome and Asiatic 13-chromosome species ofGosspyium. Jour. Agr. Res.60: 175–182. 1940.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Berger, C. A. Some criteria for judging the degree of polyploidy of cells in the resting stage. Am. Nat.75: 93–96. 1941.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Blake, M. A. Some results of crosses of early ripening varieties of peaches. Proc. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci.37: 232–241. 1939.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Blakeslee, A. al. Inheritance in tetraploidDaturas. Bot. Gaz.76: 329–373. 1923.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    — andSatina, S. New hybrids from incompatible crosses inDatura through culture of excised embryos on malt media. Science99: 331–334. 1944.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Böös, G. Neue embryologische Studien überAlchimella arvensis L. Scop. Bot. Not.1924: 209–250. 1924.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Boyes, J. W. andThompson, W. P. The development of the endosperm and embryo in reciprocal interspecific crosses in cereals. Jour. Genet.34: 203–227. 1937.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Bradbury, Dorothy. A comparative study of the developing and aborting fruits ofPrunus cerasus. Am. Jour. Bot.16: 525–542. 1929.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Brink, R. A. Mendelian ratios and the gametophyte generation in angiosperms. Genetics10: 359–394. 1925.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    — andBurnham, C. R. Differential action of the sugary gene in maize on two alternative classes of male gametophytes. Genetics12: 348–378. 1927.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    — andCooper, D. C. Double fertilization and development of the seed in angiosperms. Bot. Gaz.102: 1–25. 1940.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    —— Incomplete seed failure as a result of somatoplastic sterility. Genetics26: 487–505. 1941.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    —— The antipodals in relation to abnormal endosperm behavior inHordeum jubatum ×Secale cereale hybrid seeds. Genetics29: 391–406. 1944.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    et al. A hybrid betweenHordeum jubatum andSecale cereale reared from an artificially cultivated embryo. Jour. Hered.35: 67–75. 1944.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    — andMacGillivray, J. H. Segregation for the waxy character in maize pollen and differential development of the male gametophyte. Am. Jour. Bot.11: 465–469. 1924.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Bryant, L. R. A study of the factors affecting the development of the embryo-sac and the embryo in the Mclntosh apple. Univ. N. H. Agr. Exp. Sta., Bul.61: 1–40. 1935.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Buch holz, J. T. Embryological aspects of hybrid vigor in pines. Science102: 135–142. 1945.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    — andBlakeslee, A. F. Pollen-tube behavior with reference to sterility inDatura. Mem. Hort. Soc. N. Y.3: 245–260. 1927.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    —— Pollen-tube growth in crosses between balanced chromosomal types ofDatura stramonium. Genetics14: 538–568. 1929.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Capoor, S. P. Contribution to the morphology of some Indian Liliaceae. II. The gametophytes ofUrginea indica Kunth. Bel. Bot. Centralb.56: 156–170. 1937.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Carano, E. Ulteriori osservazioni suEuphorbia dulcis L. in rapporto col suo comportamento apomittico. Annali di Bot.17: 50–79. 1926.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Chamberlain, C. J. Gymnosperms, structure and evolution. 1935.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Christoff, M. Cytological studies in the genusNicotiana. Genetics13: 233–277. 1928.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Clark, F. J. and Copeland, F. C. Chromosome aberrations in the endosperm of maize. Am. Jour. Bot.27: 247–251. 1940.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Cleland, R. E. Some aspects of the cyto-genetics ofOenothera. Bot. Rev.2: 316–348. 1936.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Collins, G. N. andKempton, J. H. Effects of cross-pollination on the size of seed in maize. U. S. Dept. Agr., Bur. Pl. Ind., Cir.124: 9–15. 1913.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Cooper, D. C. Macrosporogenesis and development of the embryo-sac ofLilium Henryi. Bot. Gaz.97: 346–355. 1935.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    — Macrosporogenesis and the development of the seed ofPhryma leptostachya. Am. Jour. Bot.28: 755–761. 1941.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    — Haploid-diploid twin embryos inLilium andNicotiana. Am. Jour. Bot.30: 408–413. 1943.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    — andBrink, R. A. Partial self-incompatibility and the collapse of fertile ovules as factors affecting seed formation in alfalfa. Jour. Agr. Res.60: 453–472. 1940.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    —— Somatoplastic sterility as a cause of seed failure after interspecific hybridization. Genetics25: 593–617. 1940.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    —— Collapse of the seed following the mating ofHordeum jubatum ×Secale cereale. Genetics29: 370–390. 1944.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    —— Seed collapse following matings between diploid and tetraploid races ofLycopersicon pimpinellifolium. Genetics30: 376–401. 1945.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Cori, G. al. The mechanism of formation of starch and glycogen. Federation Proc.4: 234–241. 1945.Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Correns, C. Untersuchungen über die Xenien beiZea mays. Ber. Deut. Bot. Ges.17: 410–417. 1899.Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Coulter, J. M. The embryo sac and embryo ofGnetum Gnemon. Bot. Gaz.46: 81–97. 1908.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    — Relation of megaspores to embryo sacs in angiosperms. Bot. Gaz.45: 361–366. 1908.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    — The endosperm of angiosperms. Bot. Gaz.52: 380–385. 1911.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    -et al. Textbook of botany. 1910.Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Chamberlain, C. J. Morphology of gymnosperms. 1917.Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    — andLand, W. J. G. Gametophytes and embryo ofTorreya taxifolia. Bot. Gaz.39: 161–178. 1905.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Cummings, J. M. Preliminary report on meiotic chromosomes in newDatura hybrids from embryos excised from incompatible crosses. [Abs.] Genetics30: 3. 1945.Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Dahlgren, K. V. O. Zytologische und embryologische Studien über die Reihen Primulales und Plumbaginales. Kung. Svenska Vet. Akad. Handl.56, No. 4. 1916.Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    — Notes on the ab initio cellular endosperm. Bot. Not.1923: 1–24. 1923.Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    — Die Embryologie einiger Alismataceae. Svensk Bot. Tid.22: 1–17. 1928.Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    — Zur Embryologie der Saxifragoideen. Svensk Bot. Tid.24: 429–448. 1930.Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    — Die Embryosackentwicklung vonEchinodorus tnacrophyllus undSagittaria sagittifolia. Planta21: 602–612. 1934.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    — Die Embryologie vonImpatiens Roylei. Svensk Bot. Tid.28: 103–125. 1934.Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    — Endosperm und Embryobildung beiZostera marina. Bot. Not.1939: 607–615. 1939.Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    Darlington, C. D. Recent advances in cytology. 1932.Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    Degmen, E. S. andAuchter, E. C. Metaxenia studies with apples. Proc. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci.31: 213–220. 1934.Google Scholar
  60. 60.
    Demerec, M. A case of pollen dimorphism in maize. Am. Jour. Bot.11: 461–464. 1924.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    — Cross sterility in maize. Zeit. Ind. Abst. Ver.50: 281–291. 1929.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Dermen, H. Aposporic parthenogenesis in a triploid apple,Malus hupehensis. Jour. Arn. Arb.17: 90–105. 1936.Google Scholar
  63. 63.
    Detjen, L. R. Physiological dropping of fruits. I. Relation of pollination, fertilization and embryo abortion to abscission in fruits. Del. Agr. Exp. Sta., Bul.143: 1–47. 1926.Google Scholar
  64. 64.
    Dieterich, K. Ueber die Kultur von Embryonen ausserhalb der Samen. Flora17: 379–417. 1924.Google Scholar
  65. 65.
    Dorsey, M. J. A study of sterility in the plum. Genetics4: 417–488. 1919.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    East, E. M. Genetic reactions inNicotiana. I. Compatibility. Genetics20: 403–413. 1925.Google Scholar
  67. 67.
    Edman, G. Zur Entwicklungsgeschichte der GattungOxyria Hill, nebst zytologischen, embryologischen und systematischen Bemerkungen über einige andere Polygonaceen. Acta Horti Bergiani9: 165–291. 1929.Google Scholar
  68. 68.
    — Apomeiosis und apomixis beiAtraaphaxis frutescens C. Koch. Acta Horti Bergiani11: 13–66. 1931.Google Scholar
  69. 69.
    Emerson, R. al. A summary of linkage studies in maize. Cornell Univ. Agr. Exp. Sta., Mem.180: 1–83. 1935.Google Scholar
  70. 70.
    Ernst, A. Embryobildung beiBalanophora. Flora106: 129–159. 1914.Google Scholar
  71. 71.
    Esenbeck, E. andSuessenguth, K. Über die aseptische Kultur pflanzlichen Embryonen, zugleich ein Beitrag zum Nachweis der Enzymausscheidung. Arch. Exp. Zell.1: 547–586. 1925.Google Scholar
  72. 72.
    Fagerlind, F. Embryologische, zytologische und Bestäubungsexperimentelle Studien in der Familie Rubiaceae nebst Bemerkungen über einige Polyploiditätsprobleme. Acta Horti Bergiani11: 195–470. 1937.Google Scholar
  73. 73.
    -. Bau und Entwicklung der Gnetum-gametophyten. Kung. Svenska Vet. Handl. III,19(8). 1941.Google Scholar
  74. 74.
    — Kompatibilität und Inkompatibilität in der GattungRosa. Acta Horti Bergiani13: 247–302. 1944.Google Scholar
  75. 75.
    Fisher, G. C. Seed development in the genusPeperomia. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club41: 137–156, 221–241. 1914.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. 76.
    Fitting, H. Entwicklungsphysiologische Probleme der Fruchtbildung. Biol. Centralblatt29: 193–206, 225–239. 1909.Google Scholar
  77. 77.
    Focke, W. Die Pflanzen-mischlinge. 1881.Google Scholar
  78. 78.
    Friesendahl, A. Cytologische und entwicklungsgeschichte Studien überMyricaria germanica Desv. Kung. Svenska Vet. Akad. Handl.48(7). 1912.Google Scholar
  79. 79.
    Frost, H. B. Polyembryony, heterozygosis and chimeras inCitrus. Hilgardia1: 365–402. 1926.Google Scholar
  80. 80.
    Frye, T. C. A morphological study of certain Asclepiadaceae. Bot. Gaz.34: 389–413. 1902.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. 81.
    Gaines, E. F. andAase, H. C. A haploid wheat plant. Am. Jour. Bot.13: 373–385. 1926.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. 82.
    Gentcheff, G. andGustafsson, A. Parthenogenesis and pseudogamy inPotentilla. Bot. Not.1940: 109–132. 1940.Google Scholar
  83. 83.
    Goebel, K. Organographie der Pflanzen. Dritten Teil: 1379–2078. 1933.Google Scholar
  84. 84.
    Griffee, F. Comparative vigor of F1 wheat crosses and their parents. Jour. Agr. Res.22: 53–63. 1921.Google Scholar
  85. 85.
    Guignard, L. Note sur l’origine et la structure du tégument séminal chez les Capparidées, Resedacées, Hypericacées, Balsaminées et Linacées. Bull. Soc. Bot. France, II,40: 56–59. 1893.Google Scholar
  86. 86.
    — Sur les anthérozoides et la double copulation sexuelle chez les végétaux angiospermes. Cotnp. Rend. Acad. Sci., Paris128: 864–871. 1899.Google Scholar
  87. 87.
    — La double fécondation dans leNajas major. Jour, de Bot.15: 205–213. 1901.Google Scholar
  88. 88.
    Gustafsson, A. Castrierung und Pseudogamie in der GattungRubus. Bot Not.1930: 477–494. 1930.Google Scholar
  89. 89.
    — Sind dieconina-Rosen apomiktisch? Bot. Not.1931: 21–30. 1931.Google Scholar
  90. 90.
    Gustafson, F. G. Parthenocarpy: natural and artificial. Bot. Rev.8: 599–654. 1942.Google Scholar
  91. 91.
    Haagen-Smit, A. J. et al. A method for the culturing of excised, immature corn embryos in vitro. Science101: 234. 1945.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. 92.
    Haberlandt, G. Wundhormone als Erreger von Zellteilungen. Beitr. Allg. Bot.2: 1–53. 1923.Google Scholar
  93. 93.
    Håkansson, A. Studien über die Entwicklungsgeschichte der Umbelliferen. Lunds Univ. Arsskr. N. F. Afd. 2,18, No. 7. 1923.Google Scholar
  94. 94.
    — Die Entwicklung des Embryosacks und die Befruchtung beiPoa alpina. Hereditas29: 25–61. 1943.Google Scholar
  95. 95.
    — Ergänzende Beiträge zur Embryologie vonPoa alpina. Bot. Not.1944: 299–311. 1944.Google Scholar
  96. 96.
    Hall, J. G. An embryological study ofLimnocharis emarginata. Bot. Gaz.33: 214–219. 1902.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. 97.
    Hannig, E. Ueber die Kultur von Cruciferen Embryonen ausserhalb des Embryosacks. Bot. Zeit.62: 45–80. 1904.Google Scholar
  98. 98.
    Harrison, G. J. Metaxenia in cotton. Jour. Agr. Res.42: 521–544. 1931.Google Scholar
  99. 99.
    Harrold, T. J. Comparative study of the developing and aborting fruits ofPrunus persica. Bot. Gaz.96: 505–520. 1935.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. 100.
    Hassid, W. Z. Recent advances in the molecular constitution of starch and glycogen. Federation Proc.4: 227–234. 1945.Google Scholar
  101. 101.
    Hatcher, E. S. J. andGregory, F. G. Auxin production during development of the grain of cereals. Nature148: 626. 1941.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. 102.
    Heinicke, A. J. Factors influencing the abscission of flowers and partially developed fruits of the apple (Pyrus malus L.). Cornell Univ. Agr. Exp. Sta., Bul.393: 43–114. 1917.Google Scholar
  103. 103.
    Hiorth, G. Zur Kenntnis der Homozygoten-Eliminierung und der Pollenschlauchkonkurrenz beiOenothera. Zeits. Ind. Abst. Vererb.43: 171–237. 1926.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. 104.
    Hollingshead, Lillian. A lethal factor inCrepis effective only in an interspecific hybrid. Genetics15: 114–140. 1930.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  105. 105.
    Holmgren, J. Zytologische Studien über die Fortpflanzung bei den GattungenErigeron undEupatorium. Kung. Svenska Vet. Akad. Handl.59(7): 1–117. 1919.Google Scholar
  106. 106.
    Janaki-Ammal, E. K. Intergeneric hybrids ofSaccharum. Jour. Genet.41: 217–253. 1941.Google Scholar
  107. 107.
    Johansen, D. A. Morphology and embryology ofFouquieria. Am. Jour. Bot.23: 95–99. 1936.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  108. 108.
    Johnson, D. S. On the endosperm and embryo ofPeperomia pellucida. Bot. Gaz.30: 1–11. 1900.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. 109.
    — On the development ofSaururus cernuus L. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club27: 365–372. 1900.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  110. 110.
    Johri, B. M. Studies in the family Alismaceae. I.Limnophyton obtusijolium Mig. Jour. Indian Bot. Soc.14: 49–66. 1935.Google Scholar
  111. 111.
    Jones, D. F. Heritable characters of maize. IV. A lethal factor- Defective seeds. Jour. Hered.11: 161–167. 1920.Google Scholar
  112. 112.
    — Somatic segregation. Bot. Rev.7: 291–307. 1941.Google Scholar
  113. 113.
    Jörgensen, C. A. Studies on Callitrichaceae. Svensk Bot. Tid.38: 81–126. 1923.Google Scholar
  114. 114.
    — Zur Frage der systematischen Stellung der Callitrichaceen. Jahrb. Wiss. Bot.64: 440–442. 1925.Google Scholar
  115. 115.
    — The experimental formation of heteroploid plants in the genusSolatium. Jour. Genet.19: 133–211. 1928.Google Scholar
  116. 116.
    Joshi, A. C. Morphology ofTinospora cordifolia with some observations on the origin of single integument, nature of synergidae and affinities of the Menispermaceae. Am. Jour. Bot.26: 433–439. 1939.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  117. 117.
    — andKajale, L. B. Fertilization and seed development in Amarantaceae. Proc. Indian Acad. Sci.5: 91–100. 1937.Google Scholar
  118. 118.
    — andRama Rao, V. The embryology ofGisekia pharnaceoides L. Proc. Indian Acad. Sci.3: 71–92. 1936.Google Scholar
  119. 119.
    Jost, L. Über die Selbststerilitat einiger Blüten. Bot. Zeit.65: 77–117. 1907.Google Scholar
  120. 120.
    Juel, H. O. Vergleichende Untersuchungen über typische und parthenogenetische Fortpflanzung bei der GattungAntennaria. Kung. Svenska Vet. Akad. Handl.33(5): 1–59. 1900.Google Scholar
  121. 121.
    Junell, S. Die Samenentwicklung bei einigen Labiaten. Svensk Bot. Tid.31: 67–110. 1937.Google Scholar
  122. 122.
    Kajale, L. B. Embryo and seed development in the Nyctaginaceae. I. Studies in the genusBoerhaavia. Jour. Indian Bot. Soc.17: 243–254. 1938.Google Scholar
  123. 123.
    Karpechenko, G. D. Polyploid hybrids ofRaphanus sativus L. ×Brassica oleracea L. Zeits. Ind. Abst. Ver.48: 1–85. 1928.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  124. 124.
    Katayama, Y. Crossing experiments in certain cereals with special reference to different compatibility between the reciprocal crosses. Mem. Coll. Agr. Kyoto Imp. Univ. No.27 (Genetic Ser. No. 2): 1–75. 1933.Google Scholar
  125. 125.
    — Haploid formation by x-rays inTriticum monococcum. Cytologia5: 235–237. 1934.Google Scholar
  126. 126.
    Kempton, J. H. andMcLane, J. W. Hybrid vigor and weight of germs in the seeds of maize. Jour. Agr. Res.64: 65–80. 1942.Google Scholar
  127. 127.
    Kerr, E. A. Seed development in pseudogamous and syngamous blackberries. Ph.D. Thesis, Univ. Wis. 1944.Google Scholar
  128. 128.
    Kiesselbach, T. A. The immediate effect of gametic relationship and of parental type upon the kernel weight of corn. Nebr. Agr. Exp. Sta., Res. Bul.33: 1–69. 1926.Google Scholar
  129. 129.
    Kihara, H. Formation of haploids by means of delayed pollination inTriticum monococcum. Bot. Mag. Tokyo54: 178–185. 1940. [Jap., Eng. sum.]Google Scholar
  130. 130.
    — andNishiyama, I. Different compatibility in reciprocal crosses ofAvena, with special reference to tetraploid hybrids between hexaploid and diploid species. Jap. Jour. Bot.6: 245–305. 1932.Google Scholar
  131. 131.
    - andYamashita, K. Künstliche Erzeugung haploides und triploides Einkornweizen durch Bestäubung mit röntgenbestrahlten Pollen. Commemoration Papers on Agron. prepared in honor of Prof. Akemine. 1938. [Jap., Ger. sum.]Google Scholar
  132. 132.
    Kostoff, D. Ontogeny, genetics, and cytology ofNicotiana hybrids. Genetica12: 33–118. 1930.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  133. 133.
    Kraus, E. J. The self-sterility problem. Jour. Hered.6: 549–557. 1915.Google Scholar
  134. 134.
    Krumbholz, G. Untersuchungen über das Vorkommen von Xenien und Metaxenien bei Aepfeln. Gartenbauwiss.6: 404–424. 1932.Google Scholar
  135. 135.
    Laibach, F. Das Taubwerden von Bastardsamen und die künstliche Aufzucht früh absterbender Bastardembryonen. Zeits. Bot.17: 417–459. 1925.Google Scholar
  136. 136.
    — Ectogenesis in plants. Jour. Hered.20: 201–208. 1929.Google Scholar
  137. 137.
    — Kreuzungsschwierigkeiten bei Pflanzen und die Möglichkeiten ihrer Behebung. Ber. Deut. Bot. Ges.48: 58–77. 1930.Google Scholar
  138. 138.
    Lammerts, W. E. Embryo culture an effective technique for shortening the breeding cycle of deciduous trees and increasing germination of hybrid seed. Am. Jour. Bot.29: 166–171. 1942.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  139. 139.
    Land, W. J. G. A morphological study ofThuja. Bot. Gaz.34: 249–259. 1902.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  140. 140.
    Landes, Margaret. The causes of self-sterility in rye. Am. Jour. Bot.26: 567–571. 1939.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  141. 141.
    Langlet, O. F. Über die Entwicklung des Eiappartes im Embryosack der Angiospermen. Svensk Bot. Tid.21: 478–485. 1927.Google Scholar
  142. 142.
    La Rue, C. D. The growth of plant embryos in culture. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club63: 365–382. 1936.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  143. 143.
    — Tissue cultures of spermatophytes. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci.22: 201–209. 1936.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  144. 144.
    — andAvery, G. S., Jr. The development of the embryoZizania aquatica in the seed and in artificial culture. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club65: 11–21. 1938.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  145. 145.
    Ledingham, G. F. Cytological and developmental studies of hybrids betweenMedicago sativa and a diploid form ofM. falcata. Genetics25: 1–15. 1940.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  146. 146.
    Lewis, C. T. andVincent, C. C. Pollination of the apple. Ore. Agr. Exp. Sta., Bul.104: 5–40. 1909.Google Scholar
  147. 147.
    Lidforss, B. Resumé seiner Arbeiten überRubus. Zeits. Ind. Abst. Ver.12: 1–13. 1914.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  148. 148.
    Lindstrom, E. W. Heritable characters of maize. XIII. Endosperm defects-sweet defective and flint defective. Jour. Hered.14: 126–135. 1923.Google Scholar
  149. 149.
    Longley, A. E. Chromosomes in maize and maize relatives. Jour. Agr. Res.28: 673–682. 1924.Google Scholar
  150. 150.
    Lowig, E. Beiträge zu Sterilitätsfragen unter besonderer Berücksichtigung einer “guter Arten”, wieSecale montanum Güss. und verschiedenerIris. Ber. Deut. Bot. Ges.123: 62–103. 1928.Google Scholar
  151. 151.
    McClintock, Barbara. The stability of broken ends of chromosomes inZea mays. Genetics26: 234–282. 1941.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  152. 152.
    McDonald, C. C. A study of seed development in three species ofErigeron with special reference to apogamy. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club54: 479–497. 1927.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  153. 153.
    McLean, S. W. New hybrids with the aberrant species,Datura ceratocaulla, secured by embryo dissection. [Abs.] Genetics30: 14–15. 1945.Google Scholar
  154. 154.
    Maheshwari, P. A critical review of the types of embryo-sacs in angiosperms. New Phytol.36: 359–417. 1937.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  155. 155.
    — Recent work on the types of embryo-sacs in angiospermsa critical review. Jour. Indian Bot. Soc.20: 229–261. 1941.Google Scholar
  156. 156.
    — The mode of endosperm formation inVallisneria, Ottelia andLimnocharis. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. (India)13: 260–263. 1943.Google Scholar
  157. 157.
    — andJohri, B. M. The embryo sac ofAcalypha indica L. Bei. bot. Centrlb.61A: 125–136. 1941.Google Scholar
  158. 158.
    — andSingh, B. Studies in the family Alismaceae. V. Proc. Nat. Inst. Sci. (India)9: 311–322. 1943.Google Scholar
  159. 159.
    Mangelsdorf, P. C. The genetics and morphology of some endosperm characters in maize. Conn. Agr. Exp. Sta., Bul.279: 513–614. 1926.Google Scholar
  160. 160.
    Mauritzon, J. Beitrag zur Embryologie der Crassulaceen. Bot. Not.1930: 233–250. 1930.Google Scholar
  161. 161.
    Maheshwari, P. Studien über die Embryologie der Familien Crassulaceae und Saxifragaceae. Akad. Abh. Lund: 1–152. 1933.Google Scholar
  162. 162.
    — Die Endosperm- und Embryo-entwicklung einiger Acanthaceen. Lunds Univ. Arsskr. N.F. Avd. 2,30: 3–42. 1934.Google Scholar
  163. 163.
    — Ein Beitrag zur Embryologie der Phytolaccaceen und Cactaceen. Bot. Not.1934: 111–135. 1934.Google Scholar
  164. 164.
    — Die Embryologie einiger Capparidaceen sowie vonTovaria pendulo. Ark. Bot.26A(15): 1–14. 1935.Google Scholar
  165. 165.
    — Etwas über die Embryologie der Bignoniaceen. Bot. Not.1935: 60–77. 1935.Google Scholar
  166. 166.
    -. Samenbau und Embryologie einiger Scitamineen. Lunds Univ. Arsskr.31(9). 1936.Google Scholar
  167. 167.
    Merry, J. Studies on the embryo ofHordeum sativum. II. The growth of the embryo in culture. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club69: 360–372. 1942.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  168. 168.
    Michaelis, P. Zur Cytologie und Embryoentwicklung vonEpilobium. Ber. Deut. Bot. Ges.43: 61–67. 1925.Google Scholar
  169. 169.
    Modilewski, J. Neue Beiträge zur Polyembryonie vonAllium odorum. Ber. Deut. Bot. Ges.48: 285–294. 1930.Google Scholar
  170. 170.
    de Mol, W. Nucleolar number and size in diptoid, triploid and aneuploid hyacinths. La Cellule38: 7–65. 1928.Google Scholar
  171. 171.
    Muir, R. M. Growth hormones as related to the setting and development of fruit inNicotiana tabacum. Am. Jour. Bot.29: 716–720. 1942.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  172. 172.
    Müller-Thurgau, H. Abhängigkeit der Ausbildung der Traubenbeeren und einiger anderer Früchte von der Entwicklung der Samen. Landw. Jahb. Schweiz12: 135–205. 1898.Google Scholar
  173. 173.
    Müntzing, A. Pseudogamie in der GattungPotentilla. Hereditas11: 267–283. 1928.Google Scholar
  174. 174.
    — Über Chromosomenvermehrung inGaleopsis-Kreuzungen und ihre phylogenetische Bedeutung. Hereditas14: 153–172. 1930.Google Scholar
  175. 175.
    — Outlines to a genetic monograph of the genusGaleopsis. Hereditas13: 185–341. 1930.Google Scholar
  176. 176.
    — Note on the cytology of some apomicticPotentilla species. Hereditas15: 166–178. 1931.Google Scholar
  177. 177.
    — Hybrid incompatibility and the origin of polyploidy. Hereditas18: 33–55. 1933.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  178. 178.
    — Aneuploidy and seed shrivelling in tetraploid rye. Hereditas29: 65–75. 1943.Google Scholar
  179. 179.
    — and G. Some new results concerning apomixis, sexuality and polymorphism inPotentilla. Bot. Not.1941: 237–278. 1941.Google Scholar
  180. 180.
    — Spontaneous changes in chromosome number in apomicticPotentilla collina. Hereditas29: 451–460. 1943.Google Scholar
  181. 181.
    Murbeck, Sv. Parthenogenetische Embryobildung in der GattungAlchimella. Lunds Uniy. Arsskr. 36, Avd.2, No. 7. 1901.Google Scholar
  182. 182.
    Murneek, A. E. Pollination and fruit setting. Mo. Agr. Exp. Sta., Bul.379: 1–28. 1937.Google Scholar
  183. 183.
    Narashima Murthy, S. K. Cytological and morphological studies inLimnophyton obtusifolium Mig. Half-yr. Jour. Mysore Univ.7: 1–32. 1933.Google Scholar
  184. 184.
    Nast, C. G. The embryogeny and seedling anatomy ofJugions regia L. Lilloa6: 163–205. 1941.Google Scholar
  185. 185.
    Nawaschin, S. Resultate einer Revision des Befruchtungsyorgangs beiLilium Martagon undFritillaria tenella. Bull. Acad. Imp. Sci. St. Pet.9: 377–382. 1898. [Bot. Centralb. 77: 62. 1899].Google Scholar
  186. 186.
    Nebel, B. R. Metaxenia in apples. Jour. Hered.27: 345–349. 1936.Google Scholar
  187. 187.
    Newman, I. V. Studies in the Australian Acacias. IV. Proc. Linnean Soc. N.S. Wales56: 277–313. 1934.Google Scholar
  188. 188.
    Nicolaisen, W. Über quantitative Xenien bei Roggen und Erbsen. Zeits. Züchtung, Reihe A, Pflanzenzucht17: 265–276. 1931-32.Google Scholar
  189. 189.
    Nielsen, E. L. Cytology and breeding behavior of selected plants ofPoa pratensis. Bot. Gaz.106: 357–382. 1945.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  190. 190.
    Nixon, R. W. The immediate influence of pollen on the size and time of ripening of the fruit of the date palm. Jour. Hered.19: 240–254. 1928.Google Scholar
  191. 191.
    Noack, K. L. ÜberHypericum Kreuzungen. VI. Fortpflanzungsverhältnisse und Bastarde vonHypericum perforatum L. Zeits. Ind. Abst. Ver.76: 569–601. 1939.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  192. 192.
    Olmo, H. P. Empty-seededness in varieties ofVitis vinifera. Proc. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci.32: 376–380. 1934.Google Scholar
  193. 193.
    Pace, L. Apogamy inAtamosco. Bot. Gaz.56: 376–394. 1913.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  194. 194.
    Paddich, M. E. andSprague, H. B. Maize seed characters in relation to hybrid vigor. Jour. Am. Soc. Agron.31: 743–750. 1939.Google Scholar
  195. 195.
    Pearson, H. M. Parthenocarpy and seed abortion inVitis vinifera. Proc. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci.29: 169–175. 1932.Google Scholar
  196. 196.
    — Parthenocarpy and seedlessness inVitis vinifera. Science76: 594. 1932.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  197. 197.
    Porsch, O. Versuch einer phylogenetischen Erklärung des Embryosackes und der doppelten Befruchtung der Angiospermen. 1907.Google Scholar
  198. 198.
    — Versuch einer Phylogenie des Embryosackes und der doppelten Befruchtung der Angiospermen. Verh. Zool.-Bot. Ges. Wien1907: 120–134. 1907.Google Scholar
  199. 199.
    Quincke, F. L. Interspecific and intergeneric crosses withHordeum. Canad. Jour: Res., C,18: 372–373. 1940.Google Scholar
  200. 200.
    Raghavan, T. S. Studies in the Capparidaceae. I. The life history ofCleome Chelidonii Linn. Fil. Jour. Linn. Soc. Bot.51: 43–72. 1937.Google Scholar
  201. 201.
    Randolph, L. F. Cytogenetics of tetraploid maize. Jour. Agr. Res.50: 591–605. 1935.Google Scholar
  202. 202.
    — Developmental morphology of the caryopsis of maize. Jour. Agr. Res.53: 881–916. 1936.Google Scholar
  203. 203.
    — Embryo culture ofIris seed. Bull. Am. Iris Soc.97: 33–45. 1945.Google Scholar
  204. 204.
    — andCox, L. G. Factors influencing the germination ofIris seed and the relation of inhibiting substances to embryo dormancy. Proc. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci.43: 284–300. 1943.Google Scholar
  205. 205.
    Rangasamy, K. Contribution to the life history ofVallisneria spiralis. Jour. Indian Bot. Soc.13: 129–148. 1934.Google Scholar
  206. 206.
    Redinger, K. Über die Entstehung diploider Embryonen aus unbefruchteten, mit gattungsfremden Pollen bestäubten Samenanlagen beiPetunia nyctaginiflora. Biol. Zentralbl.58: 142–151. 1938.Google Scholar
  207. 207.
    Renner, O. Befruchtung und Embryobildung beiOenothera Lamarckiana und einigen verwandten Arten. Flora107: 115–151. 1914.Google Scholar
  208. 208.
    Robbins, W. W. andBorthwick, H. A. Development of the seed ofAsparagus officinalis. Bot. Gaz.80: 426–438. 1925.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  209. 209.
    Roberts, R. H. Apple physiology. Growth, composition, and fruiting responses in apple trees. Wis. Agr. Exp. Sta., Bul.68: 1–72. 1926.Google Scholar
  210. 210.
    Rocén, Th. Zur Embryologie der Centrospermen. Diss., Uppsala. 1927.Google Scholar
  211. 211.
    Samuelsson, G. Studien über die Entwicklungsgeschichte einigerBicornes-Typen. Svensk Bot. Tid.7: 97–188. 1913.Google Scholar
  212. 212.
    Sansome, E. al. Disintegration of ovules in tetraploid-diploid and in incompatible species crosses inDatura. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club69: 405–420. 1942.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  213. 213.
    Satina, S. andBlakeslee, A. F. Fertilization in the incompatible crossDatura stramonium ×D metel. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club62: 301–312. 1935.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  214. 214.
    et al. Chromosome behavior in triploidDatura. III. The seed. Am. Jour. Bot.25: 595–602. 1938.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  215. 215.
    Sawyer, M. L. CrossingIris pseudacorus andI. versicolor. Bot. Gaz.79: 60–72. 1925.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  216. 216.
    Schnarf, K. Beiträge zur Kenntnis der Samenentwicklung der Labiaten. Denks. Akad. Wiss. Wien. Math.-Nat. Kl.94: 211–275. 1917.Google Scholar
  217. 217.
    -. Embryologie der Angiospermen. 1929.Google Scholar
  218. 218.
    -. Vergleichende Embryologie der Angiospermen. 1931.Google Scholar
  219. 219.
    — Contemporary understanding of embryo-sac development among angiosperms. Bot. Rev.2: 565–585. 1936.Google Scholar
  220. 220.
    Schreiner, E. J. andDuffield, J. W. Metaxenia in an oak species cross. Jour. Hered.33: 97–98. 1942.Google Scholar
  221. 221.
    Schürhoff, P. N. Zur Phylogenie des Angiospermen-Embryosackes. Ber. Deut. Bot. Ges.37: 160–168. 1919.Google Scholar
  222. 222.
    — Zur Apogamie vonCalycanthus. Flora116: 73–84. 1923.Google Scholar
  223. 223.
    -. Die Zytologie der Blutenpflanzen. 1926.Google Scholar
  224. 224.
    Sears, E. R. Inviability of intergeneric hybrids involvingTriticum monocoecum andT. aegilopoides. Genetics29: 113–127. 1944.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  225. 225.
    Shoemaker, D. N. On the development ofHamamelis virginiana. Bot. Gaz.39: 245–266. 1905.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  226. 226.
    Skirm, G. W. Embryo culturing as an aid to plant breeding. Jour. Hered.33: 210–215. 1942.Google Scholar
  227. 227.
    Skovsted, A. Cytological studies in cotton. III. A hybrid betweenGossypium Davidsonii Kell. andG. Sturtii F. Muell. Jour. Genet.30: 397–405. 1935.Google Scholar
  228. 228.
    Smith, D. C. Intergeneric hybridization of cereals and other grasses. Jour. Agr. Res.64: 33–47. 1942.Google Scholar
  229. 229.
    Smith, W. K. Propagation of chlorophyll-deficient sweetclover hybrids as grafts. Jour. Hered.34: 135–140. 1943.Google Scholar
  230. 230.
    Söderberg, E. Bemerkungen zur Nomenklatur der parthenogenetischenErigeron-Arten. Svensk Bot. Tid.23: 261–262. 1929.Google Scholar
  231. 231.
    Sprague, G. F. Heterofertilization in maize. Science69: 526–527. 1929.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  232. 232.
    — The nature and extent of hetero-fertilization in maize. Genetics17: 358–368. 1932.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  233. 233.
    — Pollen tube establishment and the deficiency of waxy seeds in certain maize crosses. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci.19: 838–841. 1933.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  234. 234.
    — Hybrid vigor and growth rates in a maize cross and its reciprocal. Jour. Agr. Res.53: 819–830. 1937.Google Scholar
  235. 235.
    Stadler, L. J. The comparison of ultraviolet and x-ray effects on mutation. Cold Spring Harb. Symp. Quant. Biol.9: 168–178. 1941.Google Scholar
  236. 236.
    Stebbins, G. L., Jr. Cytology ofAntennaria. II. Parthenogenetic species. Bot. Gaz.94: 322–345. 1932.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  237. 237.
    —. Apomixis in the angiosperms. Bot. Rev.7: 507–542. 1941.Google Scholar
  238. 238.
    Stenar, H. Embryologische Studien. I. Zur Embryologie einiger Columniferen. II. Die Embryologie der Amaryllidaceen. Akad. Abh. Uppsala. 1925.Google Scholar
  239. 239.
    Stephens, S. G. Colchicine-produced polyploids inGossypium. I. An autotetraploid Asiatic cotton and certain of its hybrids with wild diploid species. Jour. Genet.44: 272–295. 1942.Google Scholar
  240. 240.
    Stork, H. E. Studies in the genusTaraxacum. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club47: 199–210. 1920.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  241. 241.
    Stout, A. B. Seedlessness in grapes. N. Y. State Agr. Exp. Sta., Tech. Bul.238: 1–68. 1936.Google Scholar
  242. 242.
    Sturtevant, A. H. Renner’s studies on the genetics ofOenothera. Quart. Rev. Biol.1: 283–288. 1926.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  243. 243.
    Svenson, H. G. Embryologien hosLycopsis arvensis. Svensk Bot. Tid.16: 137–138. 1922.Google Scholar
  244. 244.
    -. Zur Embryologie der Hydrophyllaceen, Boraginaceen und Heliotropiaceen. Uppsala, Univ. Ars. Mat. Nat.2. 1925.Google Scholar
  245. 245.
    Swingle, W. T. Metaxenia or the influence of the male parent on the tissues of the mother plant outside of the embryo and endosperm, especially as exemplified in the date palm. 3rd Pan Pacific Sci. Cong. (1926) Proc. I: 1164–1165 [Tokyo, 1928]. 1928.Google Scholar
  246. 246.
    Täckholm, G. Zytologische Studien über die GattungRosa. Acta Horti Bergiani7: 97–381. 1922.Google Scholar
  247. 247.
    Thompson, W. P. Shrivelled endosperm in species crosses in wheat, its cytological causes and genetical effects. Genetics15: 99–113. 1930PubMedGoogle Scholar
  248. 248.
    — Causes of difference in success of reciprocal interspecific crosses. Amer. Nat.64: 407–421. 1930.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  249. 249.
    — The causes of hybrid sterility and incompatibility. Trans. Royal Soc. Canada34: 1–13. 1940.Google Scholar
  250. 250.
    — andCameron, D. R. Chromosome numbers in functioning germ cells of species-hybrids in wheat. Genetics13: 456–469. 1928.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  251. 251.
    — andJohnston, D. The cause of incompatibility between barley and rye. Canad. Jour. Res., C,23: 1–15. 1945.Google Scholar
  252. 252.
    Tournois, J. Formations d’embryons chéz le Houblon par l’action du pollen du Chanvre. Compt. Rend. Acad. Sci., Paris153: 1160. 1911.Google Scholar
  253. 253.
    — Études sur la sexualité du Houblon. Ann. Sci. Nat.19: 49. 1914.Google Scholar
  254. 254.
    Tukey, H. B. Embryo abortion in early-ripening varieties ofPrunus avium. Bot. Gaz.94: 433–468. 1933.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  255. 255.
    — Growth of the peach embryo in relation to growth of fruit and season of ripening. Proc. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci.30: 209–218. 1933.Google Scholar
  256. 256.
    — Artificial culture of sweet cherry embryos. Jour. Hered.24: 1–12. 1933.Google Scholar
  257. 257.
    — Growth patterns of plants developed from immature embryos in artificial culture. Bot. Gaz.99: 630–665. 1938.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  258. 258.
    — andLee, A. Embryo abortion in the peach in relation to chemical composition and season of fruit ripening. Bot. Gaz.98: 586–597. 1937.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  259. 259.
    Van Overbeek, J. Hormonal control of embryo and seedling. Cold Spring Harb. Symp. Quant. Biol.10: 126–133. 1942.Google Scholar
  260. 260.
    et al. Chemical stimulation of ovule development and its possible relation to parthenogenesis. Am. Jour. Bot.28: 647–656. 1941.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  261. 261.
    et al. Factors in coconut milk essential for growth and development of very youngDatura embryos. Science94: 350–351. 1941.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  262. 262.
    et al. Cultivation in vitro of smallDatura embryos. Am. Jour. Bot.29: 472–477. 1942.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  263. 263.
    et al. Factors affecting the growth ofDatura embryos in vitro. Am. Jour. Bot.31: 219–224. 1944.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  264. 264.
    de Vries, H. Sur la fécondation hybride de l’albumen. Compt. Rend. Acad. Sci., Paris129: 973–975. 1899.Google Scholar
  265. 265.
    Waite, M. B. The pollination of pear flowers. U. S. Dept. Agr., Div. Veg. Path., Bul.5: 1–110. 1895.Google Scholar
  266. 266.
    Wakakuwa, Sh. Embryological studies on the different seed-development in reciprocal interspecific crosses of wheat. Jap. Jour. Bot.7: 151–185. 1934.Google Scholar
  267. 267.
    Watkins, A. E. Genetic and cytological studies in wheat. III. Jour. Genet.18: 375–396. 1927.Google Scholar
  268. 268.
    — Hybrid sterility and incompatibility. Jour. Genet.25: 125–162. 1932.Google Scholar
  269. 269.
    Weatherwax, P. A rare carbohydrate in waxy maize. Genetics7: 568–572. 1922.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  270. 270.
    Webber, H. J. Xenia, or the immediate effect of pollen in maize. U. S. Dept. Agr., Div. Veg. Phys. & Path., Bul.22: 1–44. 1900.Google Scholar
  271. 271.
    Webber, J. M. Polyembryony. Bot. Rev.6: 575–598. 1940.Google Scholar
  272. 272.
    Werckmeister, P. Über Herstellung und künstliche Aufzucht von Bastarden der GattungIris. Gartenbauwiss.10: 500–520. 1937.Google Scholar
  273. 273.
    Wexelsen, H. Studies on fertility, inbreeding, and heterosis in red clover (Trifolium pratense L.). Skr. Norsk. Videnshaps. Akad. Oslo, I. Math.-Nat. Kl.,1945, No. 1: 1–141. 1945.Google Scholar
  274. 274.
    White, P. R. Potentially unlimited growth of excised tomato root tips in a liquid medium. Pl. Physiol.9: 585–600. 1934.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  275. 275.
    — Controlled differentiation in a plant tissue culture. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club66: 507–513. 1939.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  276. 276.
    -White, P. R. A handbook of plant tissue culture. 1943.Google Scholar
  277. 277.
    Wilson, J. K. Calcium-hypochlorite as a seed sterilizer. Am. Jour. Bot.2: 420–427. 1915.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  278. 278.
    Winge, ø. The chromosomes. Their numbers and general importance. Compt. Rend. Lab. Carlsberg13: 131–275. 1917.Google Scholar
  279. 279.
    Winkler, H. Über Parthenogenesis und Apogamie im Pflanzenreich. Prog. Rei Bot.2: 293–454. 1908.Google Scholar
  280. 280.
    Wipf, Louise, andCooper, D. C. Chromosome numbers in nodules and roots of red clover, common vetch and garden pea. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci.24: 87–91. 1938.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  281. 281.
    Wittwer, S. H. Growth hormone production during sexual reproduction of higher plants. Mo. Agr. Exp. Sta., Res. Bul.371. 1943.Google Scholar
  282. 282.
    Woodcock, E. F. Seed studies in Nyctaginaceae. Papers Mich. Acad. Sci., Arts, Letters9: 495–502. 1929.Google Scholar
  283. 283.
    Wylie, R. B. The morphology ofElodea canadensis. Bot. Gaz.37: 1–22. 1904.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The New York Botanical Garden 1947

Authors and Affiliations

  • R. A. Brink
    • 1
  • D. C. Cooper
    • 1
  1. 1.University of WisconsinUSA

Personalised recommendations