Advertisement

The Botanical Review

, Volume 41, Issue 3, pp 233–258 | Cite as

Plant pubescence: An ecological perspective

  • Hyrum B. Johnson
Article

Keywords

Botanical Review Glandular Trichome Salt Gland Glandular Hair Carnegie Inst 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature Cited

  1. Amelunxen, F. 1964. Electronenmikroskopische Untersuchungen an den Druessenhaaren vonMentha piperka. Planta12: 121–139.Google Scholar
  2. Appel, O. 1915. Disease resistance in Plants. Science41: 773–782.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bary, Anton de. 1884. Comparative Anatomy of the Vegetative Organs of the Phanerogams and Ferns (translated by F. O. Bower). Oxford, xiv: 659 pp.Google Scholar
  4. Benson, L. 1957. Plant Classification. D.C. Heath and Company, Boston, xiv: 688 pp.Google Scholar
  5. Beckman, C. H., W. C. Mueller, and W. E. McHardy. 1972. The localization of stored phenols in plant hairs. Physiol. Plant Path.2: 69–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Berry, W. L. 1971. Characteristics of salts secreted byTamarix aphylla. Amer. J. Bot.57: 1226–1230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Billings, W. D., and R. J. Morris. 1951. Reflection of visible and infrared radiation from leaves of different ecological groups. Amer. J. Bot.38: 327–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Broersma, D. B., R. L. Bernard, and W. H. Luckmann. 1972. The effects of soybean pubescence on populations of potato leafhopper. J. Econ. Entomol.65: 78–82.Google Scholar
  9. Candolle, Aug. P. de. 1841. Vegetable Organography; or, an Analytical Description of the Organs of Plants (translated by Boughton Kingdon), Vol. I. Houlston and Stoneman, London, xii: 326 pp.Google Scholar
  10. Cannon, W. A. 1908. On the origin of structures in plants. Amer. Nat.42: 779–782.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cannon, W. A. 1909. Studies in heredity as illustrated in the trichomes of species and hybrids ofJuglans, Oenothera, Papaver, andSolanum. Carnegie Inst. Washington Publ.117: 67 pp.Google Scholar
  12. Carlquist, S. 1961. Comparative Plant Anatomy. Holt, Rinehart and Winston, N. Y. ix: 146 pp.Google Scholar
  13. Clausen, J., and W. M. Hiesey. 1958. Experimental studies on the nature of species. IV. Genetic structure of ecological races. Carnegie Inst. Washington Publ.615: 312 pp.Google Scholar
  14. Clausen, J. D., D. Keck, and W. M. Hiesey. 1940. Experimental studies on the nature of species. I. The effect of varied environments of Western North American plants. Carnegie Inst. Washington Publ.52: 452 pp.Google Scholar
  15. Cooper, W. S. 1922. The broad-sclerophyll vegetation of California. Carnegie Inst. Washington Publ.319: 124 pp.Google Scholar
  16. Coulter, J. M., C. R. Barnes, and H. C. Cowles. 1911. A Text Book of Botany for Colleges and Universities. Vol. II. Ecology. Amer. Book Co., N. Y. x: 485–964 + index.Google Scholar
  17. Delevoryas, T. 1962. Morphology and Evolution of Fossil Plants. Holt, Rinehart and Winston, N. Y. ix: 189 pp.Google Scholar
  18. Dolzmann, P. 1964. Elektronenmikroskopische Untersuchungen an den Saughaaren vonTillandsia usenoides. (Bromeliaceae). I. Feinstrukter der kuppelzelle. Planta Arch. Wiss. Bot.60: 461–472.Google Scholar
  19. Dolzmann, P. 1965. Elektronenmikroskopische Untersuchungen an den Saughaaren vonTillandsia usenoides. (Bromeliaceae). II. Feinstruktur der Plasmodesmen. Planta64: 76–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Ehrlich, P. R., and P. H. Raven. 1964. Butterflies and plants: A study on coevolution. Evolution18: 586–608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Esau, K. 1965. Plant Anatomy. John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York, xx: 767 pp.Google Scholar
  22. Feeny, P. P. 1968. Seasonal changes in the tannin content of oak leaves. Phyto-chemistry7: 871–880.Google Scholar
  23. Fernald, M. L. 1950. Gray’s Manual of Botany, 8th Ed. American Book Co., N.Y. lxiv: 1632 pp.Google Scholar
  24. Fritsch, F. E., and E. Salisbury. 1965. Plant form and function. Bell, London.Google Scholar
  25. Gallun, R. L. 1966. Resistance of small grains to the cereal leaf beetle. J. Econ. Entomol.59: 827–829.Google Scholar
  26. Gates, D. M. 1962. Energy Exchange in the Biosphere. Harper and Row, N. Y. viii: 151 pp.Google Scholar
  27. Gates, D. M. 1966. Spectral distribution of solar radiation at the Earth’s surface. Science151: 523–529.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Gates, D. M., H. J. Keegan, J. C. Schleter, and V. R. Weidner. 1965. Spectral properties of plants. Appl. Optics4: 11–20.Google Scholar
  29. Gates, D. M., and W. Tantraporn. 1952. The reflectivity of deciduous trees and herbaceous plants in the infrared to 25 microns. Science115: 613–616.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Gates, D. M. 1968. Transpiration and leaf temperature. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol.19: 211–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Gausman, H. W., and R. Cardenas. 1969. Effect of leaf pubescence ofGynura aurantraca on light reflectance. Bot. Gaz.130: 158–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Gausman, H. W., and R. Cardenas. 1973. Light reflectance by leaflets of pubescent, normal and glabrous soybean lines. Agron. J.65: 837–838.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Gerarde, J. 1633. The Herball or Generall Historie of Plantes. (Enlarged and amended by Thomas Johnson. I Printed by Adam a Islip, Joice Norton and Richard Witakers, London. 1696 pp.Google Scholar
  34. Gilbert, L. E. 1971. Butterfly-plant coevolution: HasPassiflora adenopoda won the selectional race with Heliconiine butterflies? Science172: 585–586.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Gleason, H. A., and A. Cronquist. 1963. Manual of Vascular Plants of Northeastern United States and Adjacent Canada. D. Van Nostrand Co., Inc. Princeton, N. J.Google Scholar
  36. Goodspeed, T. H. 1954. The genus Nicotiana. Waltham, Mass.: Chronica Botanica Co. Chronica Botanica16: xxii + 536 pp.Google Scholar
  37. Grew, N. 1965. The Anatomy of Plants. Johnson Reprint Corp., N. Y. (Reprinted from 1862 ed.). xvii + 304 + index + plates.Google Scholar
  38. Guettard, J. E. 1745. Sur les corps glanduleaux des plantes, leurs filets on poils et les matières qui en sortent. Acad. Roy. Sci., Paris1745: 261–308.Google Scholar
  39. Haberlandt, G. J. F. 1914. Physiological Plant Anatomy (translated by M. Drummond). Macmillan and Co., London, xv + 777 pp.Google Scholar
  40. Hammond, C. T., and P. G. Mahlberg. 1973. Morphology of glandular hairs ofCannabis saliva from scanning electron microscopy. Amer. J. Bot.60: 524–528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Hanson, H. C. 1917. Leaf structure as related to environment. Amer. J. Bot.4: 533–559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Heinrich, G. 1973. Die Feinstruktur der Trichom-Hydathoden vonMonarda fistulosa. Protoplasma77: 271–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Hendrycy, K. 1967. The effect of trichomes on transpiration and ion uptake inVerbascum thapsus. L. Bios.39: 21–26.Google Scholar
  44. Hooke, R. 1665. Micrographia. London. xxxiv + 246 pp.Google Scholar
  45. Hummel, K., and K. Staesche. 1962. Die Verbreitung der Haartypen in den natürlichen Verwandtschaftsgruppen.In: Handbuch der Pflanzenanatomie (Ed. by W. Zimmerman and P. G. Ozenda). Gebrüder Borntraeger, Berlin 4(5): 209–292.Google Scholar
  46. Inamden, J. A., K. S. Patel, and R. C. Patel. 1973. Studies on Plasmodesmata in the trichomes and leaf epidermis of some Asclepiadaceae. Ann. Bot.37: 657–660.Google Scholar
  47. Jennings, D. L. 1962. Some evidence on the influence of the morphology of raspberry canes upon their liability to be attacked by certain fungi. Hort. Res.1: 100–111.Google Scholar
  48. Johnson, B. 1953. The injurious effects of hooked epidermal hairs of french beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) onAphis craccivora Koch. Bull. Entomol. Res.44: 779–788.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Johnson, B. 1956. The influence on aphids of the glandular hairs of tomato plants. Plant Path.5: 131–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Johnson, H. B. 1968. Pubescence as a structural feature of vegetation. Ph.D. dissertation. Columbia University. N.Y. 190 pp.Google Scholar
  51. Kaufman, P. B., J. D. leCroix, J. Rosen, L. Allard, and W. C. Bigelow. 1972. Scanning electron microscopy and electron probe analysis of silicification patterns in influorescence bracts of the oat. Amer. J. Bot.59: 653.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Kerner von Marilaun, A., and F. W. Oliver. 1896. The Natural History of Plants. Blackie and Son. Ltd., London: Henry Holt and Co., N. Y. 2 vols in 4. 777 pp. and 983 pp.Google Scholar
  53. Last, F. T., and R. C. Warren. 1972. Non-parasitic microbes colonizing green leaves and their form and functions. Endeavor31: 143–150.Google Scholar
  54. Lawrence, G. H. M. 1951. Taxonomy of Vascular Plants. McMillan Co. N.Y. xiii + 823 pp.Google Scholar
  55. Lersten, N. R. 1972. Stipular glands and trichomes in relation to the bacterial leaf nodule symbiosis inPhychortria ruhiaceae. Brittonia24: 123.Google Scholar
  56. Levering, A. C., and W. W. Thomson. 1972. Studies on the ultrastructure and mechanism of secretion of the salt gland of the grassSpartina. 30 Ann. Proc. Electron Microscopy Soc. Amer. 222–223.Google Scholar
  57. Levin, D. A. 1973. The role of trichomes in plant defense. Quart. Rev. of Biol.48: 3–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Lüttage, U. 1971. Structure and function of plant glands. Ann. Rev. of Plant Physiol.22: 23–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Martin, J. T., and B. E. Juniper. 1970. The Cuticles of Plants. St. Martin’s Press, N.Y. xx + 347 pp.Google Scholar
  60. McCleery, E. M. 1906. Pubescence and other external peculiarities of Ohio plants. The Ohio Natur.7: 16–17.Google Scholar
  61. McDaniel, M. E., and G. D. Janke. 1973. Leaf pubescence in oats. Crop Sci.13: 68–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. McMillan, C. 1964. Ecotypic differentiation within four North American prairie grasses. I. Morphological variation within transplanted community fractions. Amer. J. Bot.51: 1119–1128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Metcalfe, C. R., and L. Chalk. 1950. Anatomy of the Dicotyledons. Oxford Clarendon Press. Vol. I: 1–724: Vol. II: 726–1500.Google Scholar
  64. Miroslavov, E. A. 1959. The physiological role of the noncapitate trichomes of the sepals of the flower ofMelampyrum nemorosum. English translation of Doklady-Botanical Science Section126: 128–131.Google Scholar
  65. Mohr, Hans. 1959. Der Lichteinfluss auf die Haarbildung am Hypokotyl vonSinapis alba L. Planta53: 109–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Mosquin, T. 1966. A new taxonomy forEpilobium angustifolium L. Onagraceae. Brittonia18: 167–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Munz, P. A., and P. P. Keck. 1968. A California Flora. Univ. of Calif., L.A. 1681 pp.Google Scholar
  68. Netolitsky, F. 1932. Die PflanzenhaareIn: Handbuch der Pflanzenanatomie (Ed. by K. Linsbauer). 4(2): 1–253. Gebrüder Borntraeger, Berlin.Google Scholar
  69. Osmond, C. B., U. Lüttage, K. R. West, C. K. Pallaghy, and B. Shacher-Hill. 1969. Ion absorption inA triplex leaf tissue. II. Secretion of ions to epidermal bladders. Aust. J. Biol. Sci.22: 797–814.Google Scholar
  70. Preeces, T. F., and C. H. Dickenson. 1971. Ed: Ecology of Leaf Surface Microorganisms. Acad. Press, N.Y. xvii + 640 pp.Google Scholar
  71. Rauter, J. 1872. Zur Entwicklungsgeschichte einiger Trichomgebilde. Denkschr. Akad. Wien31 No. 2.Google Scholar
  72. Reifsnyder, W. E., and H. W. Lull. 1965. Radiant Energy in Relation to Forests. Technical Bulletin No. 1344. U. S. Dept. of Agriculture (Forest Service).Google Scholar
  73. Richardson, H. H. 1943. The action of bean leaves against the bedbug. J. Econ. Entom.36: 543–545.Google Scholar
  74. Robinson, T. 1974. Metabolism and function of alkaloids in plants. Science184: 430–435.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Ross, H. H. 1933. The description and life history of a new sawflySterictiphora apius (Argidae & Hymen.). Entom. Soc. of Wash.35: 13–19.Google Scholar
  76. Ruinen, J. 1961. The Phyllosphere. I. An ecologically neglected milieu. Plant and Soil25: 81–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Sabnis, T. S. 1919–1921. The physiological anatomy of the plants of the Indian Desert. J. Indian Bot.1: 35–43; 2: 272–299.Google Scholar
  78. Sachs, J. Von. 1873. Lehrbuch der Botanik Aufl. 1973. W. Engelmann, Leipzig. xvi + 848 pp.Google Scholar
  79. Sayre, J. O. 1920. The relation of hairy leaf coverings to the resistance of leaves to transpiration. Ohio J. Sci.20: 55–86.Google Scholar
  80. Schrank, F. V. P. 1794. Von den Nebengefassen der Pflanzen und ihrem Nutaen. Halle. 2 + 94 pp.Google Scholar
  81. Schmid, R. 1972. A resolution of the Eugenia-Syzygium controversy. Amer. J. Bot.59: 423–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Schneph, E. 1968. Zur Feinstruktur der schleimsezernieren den Drüssenhaare auf der Ochrea vonRumex andRheum. Planta79: 22–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Shapiro, A. A., and H. DeForest. 1932. A comparison of transpiration rates in chaparral. Ecology13: 290–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Shreve, E. B. 1921. Causes of the seasonal changes in the transpiration ofEncelia farinosa. Yearbook Carnegie Inst. of Washington.19: 73–75.Google Scholar
  85. Shull, C. A. 1929. A spectrophotometric study of reflection of light from leaf surfaces. Bot. Gaz.87: 583–607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Sinclair, R. and D. A. Thomas. 1970. Optical properties of leaves of some species in arid south Australia. Aust. J. Bot.18: 261–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Solereder, H. 1908. Systematic Anatomy of the Dicotyledons (translated by Boudle and Fritsch). Clarendon Press, Oxford. Vol. I: xii + 644: Vol. II: vi + 645–1183.Google Scholar
  88. Stace, C. A. 1965. Cuticular studies as an aid to plant taxonomy. Bull. of the British Museum (Nat. Hist.) Botany4(1): 1–78.Google Scholar
  89. Staudermann, W. 1924. Die Haare der Monokotylen. Bot. Arch.8: 105–184.Google Scholar
  90. Stephens, S. G. 1959. Laboratory studies of feeding and oviposition preferences ofAnthonomus grandis Boh. J. Econ. Entomol.52: 390–396.Google Scholar
  91. Stephens, S. G. 1961. Further studies on the feeding and oviposition preferences of the boll weevil (Anthonomus grandis). J. Econ. Entomol.54: 1085–1090.Google Scholar
  92. Stober, J. P. 1917. A comparative study of winter and summer leaves of various herbs. Bot. Gaz.63: 89–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Stuart, W. 1906. Disease resistance of potatoes. Ut. Agr. Exp. Sta. Bull.122: 105–136.Google Scholar
  94. Suckow, S. 1873. Uber Pflanzenstacheln und ihr Verhaltnis zu Haaren und Dornen. Sitzb. Bot. Schles. Ges. f. Vaterl. Kuh. Diss. Breslau 1873.Google Scholar
  95. Tharp, W. H. 1965. The cotton plant: how it grows and why its growth varies. Agricultural Handbook No. 178. United States Department of Agriculture, Washington, D.C. 17 pp.Google Scholar
  96. Thomson, W. W. (In press). The structure and function of salt glands.In: Plants in saline environments (Eds. A. Poljokoff-Mayber and J. Gale) Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
  97. Thomson, W. W., W. L. Berry, and L. L. Liu. 1969. Localization and secretion of salt by the salt glands ofTamarix aphylla. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci.63: 310–317.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Thurston, L. E. and N. R. Lersten. 1969. The morphology and toxicology of plant stinging hairs. Bot. Rev.35: 393–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Thurston, R. 1970. Toxicity of trichome exudates ofNicotiana andPetunia species to tobacco hornworm larvae. J. Econ. Entomol.63: 272–274.Google Scholar
  100. Thurston, R., W. T. Smith and B. P. Cooper. 1966. Alkaloid secretion by trichomes ofNicotiana species and resistance to aphids. Entomol. Exp. App.9: 428–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Tschermak-Woess, E., and G. Hasitschka. 1953. Über die Endomitotische Polyploidisierund im Zuge der Differenzierung von Trichomen und Trichozyten bei Angiospermen. Österreich. Bot. Zeitsch.101: 79–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Uphof, J. C. Th. 1962. Plant Hairs.In: Encyclopedia of Plant Anatomy (Ed. by W. Zimmermann and P. G. Ozenda). Gebrüder Borntraeger, Berlin 4(5): 1–206.Google Scholar
  103. Van Duyn, J. W., S. G. Turnipseed, and J. D. Maxwell. 1972. Resistance in soybeans to the Mexican bean beetle. II. Reactions of the beetle to resistant plants. Crop Sci.12: 561–562.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Walker, J. C. 1924. On the nature of disease resistance in plants. Trans. Wis. Acad. Sci. Arts, letters2: 225–247.Google Scholar
  105. Walker, J. C. 1950. Plant Pathology. McGraw-Hill, N. Y.Google Scholar
  106. Wannamaker, W. K. 1957. The effect of plant hairiness of cotton strains on boll weevil attack. J. Econ. Entomol.50: 418–423.Google Scholar
  107. Warming, E. 1872. Sur la difference entre les trichomes et les epiblastemes d’un ordre plus eleve. Videnskab Medd. Nat. For. Kjobenhavn 1872, Nr. 10/12.Google Scholar
  108. Warming, E. 1909. Oecology of Plants: an Introduction to the study of plant communities. Oxford University Press, London, vi + 422 pp.Google Scholar
  109. Weiss, A. 1867. Die Pflanzenhaare. Karsten Bot. Unters.I: 369–677.Google Scholar
  110. Whittaker, R. H., and P. P. Feeny. 1971. Allelochemics: chemical interactions between species. Science171: 757–769.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  111. Wiegand, K. M. 1910. The relation of hairy and cutinized coverings to transpiration. Bot. Gaz.49: 430–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  112. Wolpert, A. 1962. Heat transfer analysis of factors affecting plant leaf temperature—significance of leaf hair. Plant Physiol.37: 113–120.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  113. Wong, C. L. and W. R. Blevin. 1966. Infrared reflectance of plant leaves. Aust. J. of Biol. Sci.20: 501–508.Google Scholar
  114. Wood, J. G. 1934. The physiology of xerophytism in Australian plants, the stomatal frequencies, transpiration and osmotic pressure of schlerophyll and tomentose-succulent leaved plants. J. Ecol.XXII (1): 69–87.Google Scholar
  115. Woolley, J. T. 1964. Water relations of soybean leaf hairs. Agron. J.56: 569–571.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  116. Wuenscher, J. E. 1970. The effect of leaf hairs ofVerbascum thapsus on leaf energy exchange. New Phytologist69: 65–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  117. Yapp, R. H. 1912.Spireae ulmaria and its bearing on the problem of xeromorphy in marsh plants. Ann. Bot.26: 815–870.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The New York Botanical Garden 1975

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hyrum B. Johnson
    • 1
  1. 1.University of CaliforniaRiverside

Personalised recommendations