Economic Botany

, Volume 24, Issue 2, pp 155–164 | Cite as

Our hardy Hibiscus species as ornamentals

  • Harold F. Winters


Economic Botany Light Pink Northern Form Tropical Relative Amphidiploid Plant 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature Cited

  1. 1.
    Armstrong Nurseries. 1958–60.Hibiscus Henderson Hybrids. Ontario and San Marino, Calif, p. 18, 1958; p. 20A, 1959–60. (Catalogs)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bartram, John & Son. 1807.Hibiscus palustris. Philadelphia, Pa. p. 19. (Catalog)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bates, D. M. 1965. Notes on the cultivated Malvaceae. I.Hibiscus. Baileya13(2,3): 57–130.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bliss, B. K. 1871.H. palustris roseus. Springfield, Mass. p. 34. (Catalog)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Britton, N. L. 1903. The Rose Mallows. Jour. N. Y. Bot. Garden4: 219–220. Plates 17–18.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Clausen, R. T. 1949. Checklist of the vascular plants of the Cayuga Quadrangle. Cornell Univ. Agric. Expt. Sta. Mem. 291. 87 pp.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Darby, R. H. 1969.Hibiscus ‘Lord Baltimore.’ College Park, Md. (Personal Communication)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Dodge, C. R. 1897. Useful Fiber Plants of the World. U.S. Dept. Agr. Report No. 9, 361 pp., illus.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Fernald, M. L. 1942.Hibiscus moscheutos andH. palustris. Rhodora44: 266–278.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Harrison, R. E. & Co. 1960.Hibiscus Henderson’s Hybrids, Palmerton North, New Zealand, p. 16. (Catalog)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hemming, E. S. 1952. The Perfect Mallow (Hibiscus) Marvel. Plant Life.8: 153–154.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    —. 1959. The Hardy Herbaceous Mallows. Natl. Hort. Mag.38(3): 143–144.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Henderson, W. H. 1942. New Hibiscus. The Arboretum Bull.5(3): 8, 31.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    -. 1948. GrowingHibiscus in Fresno. Golden Gard.12: 332 pp.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    —. 1951.Hibiscus. Jour. Calif. Hort. Soc.12: 120–121.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Herb, M. 1926–31.Hibiscus grandiflorus albus, p. 38, 1926–27;H. moscheutos roseus, p. 38, 1926–27;H. palustris hybridus, p. 38, 1926–27;H. grandiflorus ruber, p. 4, 1930–31. Naples, Italy. (Catalogs)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hochreutiner, B. P. G. 1900. Revision du genreHibiscus. Ann. Conserv. Jard. Bot. Genève.4: 23–191.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Howell, V. F., Maj. 1956.Hibiscus Henderson’s X Hemming Red. Surrey, England, p. 1. (Catalog)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Jacobs, M. L. & H. M. Burlage. 1958. Index of Plants of North Carolina with Reputed Medicinal Uses. Chapel Hill, N. C. 322 pp.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kennedy, C. S. 1960. Adventures with Hardy HerbaceousHibiscus. Amer. Hort. Mag.39(4): 199–203.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kuwada, H. 1964. Studies on interspecific and intergeneric hybridization in the Malvaceae. VII. The newly artificially raised amphidiploid plant named “Ai-Fuyo” (H. muta-moscheutos) obtained from the progeny ofH. mutabilis XH. moscheutos. Jap. Jour. Breeding14(1): 27–32.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    —. 1964. Studies on the cause and mechanism of poor plant growth of the F1 hybrids obtained from the crosses betweenH. coccineus (H. coccinea) andH. moscheutos (H. moschata). Jap. Jour. Breeding14(2): 55–61.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    —. 1967. The new amphidiploid plant named “Momiji-Fuyo”: (H. mutacoccineus Kuwada). Obtained from the progeny ofH. mutabilis X H. coccineus. Jap. Soc. Hort. Sci. Jour.36(2): 89–94.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Marshall, W. E. & Co., Inc. 1921.Hibiscus Marshall’s Rainbow grandiflorus Hybrids. New York, p. 40. (Catalog)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Martin, J. H. Co. 1960.Hibiscus Martin’s Giant Hybrid. Pinesville, Ohio. Fall. (Catalog)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    McFadden, S. E., Jr. 1955. New Hybrids of AmericanHibiscus spp. Proc. Fla. State Hort. Soc.68: 366–369.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    -. 1959. Promising Gator Hybrid selections of perennial Hibiscus in final test plantings at 3 locations. Sunshine State Agr. Res. Rpt. July. 4–5.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    -. 1959. Propagating perennial Hibiscus from stem cuttings. Sunshine State Agr. Res. Rpt. October. 12–14.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Meehan Nursery, Thomas. 1907–1910.Hibiscus Meehan’s Mallow Marvels, p. 74, Aug. 1907;H. Mallow Marvel (pink, red, white) p. 42, 1909;H. Meehan’s Mallow Marvels. Back cover, illus. in color, 1910. Philadelphia, Pa. (Catalogs)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Oakhurst Gardens. 1960.Hibiscus Mallow Marvel Henderson’s Giant. Arcadia, Calif. p. 27. (Catalog)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Pearce, R. D. 1944–1947.Hibiscus Avalon Hybrids, p. 50, 1944; ‘Avalon Red’ p. 35, 1947. Merchantsville, N. J. (Catalog)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Pearce Seed Co. 1953–1959.Hibiscus F1 Avalon, p. 45, 1953; H. Avalon Crimson-Leaf, p. 15, 1959. Moorestown, N. J. (Catalogs)Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Perry, Margaret. 1962. A coming spectacular: New hardy Hibiscus. Flower Grower.49(1): 14, 16, 17. Illus.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Prince, W. 1820–1827.H. moscheutos andH. palustris, p. 15, 1820;H. militaris, p. 55, 1822;H. grandiflorus, p. 106, 1825;H. moscheutos alba, H. moscheutos rubra, H. palustris var.rosea pallida, p. 152, 1827. Flushing, Long Island, N. Y. (Catalogs)Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Riegel Plant Co. 1951–66.Hibiscus ‘Red Glory,’ 1951;H. Henderson Hybrids, 1952; p. 16, 1959; p. 16, 1961; p. 6, 1966;H. Henderson’s Mutabilis Hybrid, p. 16, 1959. Experiment, Ga. (Catalogs)Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Rusanov, F. N. 1953. Hybrid hibiscus their investigation and culture. Uzbekian SSR Botanical Garden, Tashkent. 67 pp. illus.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    —. 1961. Hybridization and breeding ofHibiscus andYucca species. Moscow. Clav. Bot. Sad. B. 36–40.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    -. 1965. Hybrid Hibiscus. Academy of Sciences, Uzbekian SSR, Tashkent. 83 pp. illus.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Stanek’s Garden Center. 1969.Hibiscus Martin’s Giants, p. 27, Spokane, Wash. (Catalog)Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Stout, A. B. 1917. Notes regarding variability of the Rose Mallows. Torreya17(8): 142–148.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Swartz Nursery, The. 1952.Hibiscus (Mallow) Martin’s Giant Hybrids. Kenosha, Wisc. p. 13. (Catalog)Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Vanden Berghen, C. 1966. Notes on the vegetation of southwestern France. IV.Hibiscus palustris in the Department of Landes. Brussels Jard. Bot. Etat. Bull.36(2): 195–205.Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Wright, C. H. & D. Dewar. 1894. Johnson’s Gardener’s Dictionary. Rev. ed. p.481.Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Wyomissing Nursery. 1915-1918.Hibiscus (Mallow) New Giant Flowering, p.68, 1915;H. (Mallow) Crimson Eye, p.71, 1917–18. Wyomissing, Pa. (Catalogs)Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Yates, Arthur & Co. 1931–1932.Hibiscus moscheutos Carminea andH. moscheutos coccinea. p. 92. Auckland, N. Z. (Catalog)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The New York Botanical Garden 1970

Authors and Affiliations

  • Harold F. Winters
    • 1
  1. 1.Crop Research DivisionAgricultural Research Service, United States Department of AgricultureBeltsville

Personalised recommendations